Courseiva
Exploratory Data AnalysismediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

MLS-C01 Exploratory Data Analysis Practice Question

A machine learning engineer is analyzing a dataset and observes that the distribution of a continuous feature is heavily right-skewed. Which transformation is most likely to make the distribution approximately normal?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Log transformation

A log transformation (C) is most appropriate for heavily right-skewed continuous data because it compresses the long right tail and can make the distribution approximately normal. Square root (A) is less effective for severe skewness. Exponential (B) would amplify the skewness. Box-Cox with lambda = 0 (D) is equivalent to log, but since log is explicitly given and commonly known, option C is the direct and correct choice.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Square root transformation

    Why it's wrong here

    Square root is for moderate skew, not heavy skew.

  • Exponential transformation

    Why it's wrong here

    Exponential would increase skew.

  • Log transformation

    Why this is correct

    Log transformation is standard for right-skewed data.

  • Box-Cox transformation with lambda = 0

    Why it's wrong here

    Box-Cox transformation with lambda = 0 is equivalent to a natural logarithm transformation. While a log transformation is effective for reducing right-skewness, fixing lambda at 0 may not be the optimal power transformation to achieve approximate normality for all heavily skewed datasets. The Box-Cox method's strength lies in its ability to determine the most suitable lambda value from a range, which could be different from 0, to best normalise the data. It is tempting because log transformation is a common initial approach for right-skewed data.

Quick reference

Cloud Service Model Comparison

ModelYou ManageProvider ManagesExamples
IaaSOS, runtime, apps, dataHardware, hypervisor, networkingEC2, Azure VMs, GCP Compute Engine
PaaSApps and dataOS, runtime, middleware, hardwareElastic Beanstalk, Azure App Service
SaaSData and settings onlyEverything elseMicrosoft 365, Salesforce, Workday
FaaS / ServerlessFunction code onlyInfra, scaling, runtimeLambda, Azure Functions, Cloud Run
CaaSContainers and appsKubernetes, OS, hardwareEKS, AKS, GKE

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every MLS-C01 question from scratch — 1,672 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This MLS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLS-C01 exam.