← MLS-C01·Amazon Web Services

Question 1,190 of 1,755

Exploratory Data Analysis →hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

MLS-C01 Exploratory Data Analysis Practice Question

This MLS-C01 practice question tests your understanding of exploratory data analysis. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A data scientist is performing exploratory data analysis on a large dataset stored in Amazon S3 (100 GB, CSV format, 500 columns). The dataset contains customer transaction records with features such as transaction amount, timestamp, customer ID, and numerous categorical variables (e.g., product category, payment method, location). The scientist wants to understand the distribution of transaction amounts across different product categories and identify any outliers. They have an Amazon SageMaker notebook instance with a ml.t3.medium instance and are using pandas. However, when trying to load the entire dataset into a DataFrame using pd.read_csv('s3://bucket/data.csv'), the notebook crashes with a memory error. Additionally, the scientist suspects that some categorical columns have high cardinality (e.g., product category has thousands of unique values), and there are missing values in several columns. What is the MOST efficient approach to perform the EDA without modifying the original dataset or using additional AWS services? Options: A) Use the SageMaker SDK to launch a parallel processing job with PySpark and read the data into a Spark DataFrame, then compute statistics and visualize with matplotlib. B) Use pandas with chunksize parameter to iterate through the dataset in chunks, compute per-chunk statistics, and aggregate results; for high-cardinality columns, use value_counts() with dropna=False and then plot the top 20 categories. C) Use the S3 Select API to filter rows and columns before loading into pandas, reducing the data size; then use pandas for EDA. D) Use SageMaker Data Wrangler to import the dataset, create a flow to handle missing values and reduce cardinality, and export a sample to the notebook for analysis.

Question 1hardmultiple choice

Full question →

A
Use the SageMaker SDK to launch a parallel processing job with PySpark and read the data into a Spark DataFrame, then compute statistics and visualize with matplotlib.
Why wrong: Requires setting up PySpark which is not available on the current instance; adds unnecessary complexity and cost.
B
Use the S3 Select API to filter rows and columns before loading into pandas, reducing the data size; then use pandas for EDA.
Why wrong: S3 Select can reduce data but cannot compute distribution across categories without retrieving all rows; still may exceed memory if many categories.
C
Use SageMaker Data Wrangler to import the dataset, create a flow to handle missing values and reduce cardinality, and export a sample to the notebook for analysis.
Why wrong: Data Wrangler is a separate service requiring setup; exporting a sample may lose information needed for full distribution analysis.
D
Use pandas with chunksize parameter to iterate through the dataset in chunks, compute per-chunk statistics, and aggregate results; for high-cardinality columns, use value_counts() with dropna=False and then plot the top 20 categories.
Directly solves memory issue by chunking; handles high cardinality by limiting to top categories; no extra services needed.

Full breakdown with real-world context →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Use pandas with chunksize parameter to iterate through the dataset in chunks, compute per-chunk statistics, and aggregate results; for high-cardinality columns, use value_counts() with dropna=False and then plot the top 20 categories.

Option B is correct because it directly addresses the memory issue by processing data in chunks and handles high-cardinality categorical columns by focusing on top categories, all within the existing pandas environment without additional services. Option A requires PySpark which is not set up on the current instance and adds complexity. Option C, S3 Select, can reduce data size but cannot perform the aggregation needed (e.g., distribution across categories) without pulling all rows; it's more suitable for simple filtering. Option D, SageMaker Data Wrangler, is a separate service that requires additional setup and is not the most efficient for an ad-hoc EDA; it also modifies the workflow.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

✗
Use the SageMaker SDK to launch a parallel processing job with PySpark and read the data into a Spark DataFrame, then compute statistics and visualize with matplotlib.
Why it's wrong here
Requires setting up PySpark which is not available on the current instance; adds unnecessary complexity and cost.
✗
Use the S3 Select API to filter rows and columns before loading into pandas, reducing the data size; then use pandas for EDA.
Why it's wrong here
S3 Select can reduce data but cannot compute distribution across categories without retrieving all rows; still may exceed memory if many categories.
✗
Use SageMaker Data Wrangler to import the dataset, create a flow to handle missing values and reduce cardinality, and export a sample to the notebook for analysis.
Why it's wrong here
Data Wrangler is a separate service requiring setup; exporting a sample may lose information needed for full distribution analysis.
✓
Use pandas with chunksize parameter to iterate through the dataset in chunks, compute per-chunk statistics, and aggregate results; for high-cardinality columns, use value_counts() with dropna=False and then plot the top 20 categories.
Why this is correct
Directly solves memory issue by chunking; handles high cardinality by limiting to top categories; no extra services needed.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

Underline the problem statement mentally.
Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A media company stores terabytes of video archives that are accessed once a year for audit purposes. Moving these objects to a cold storage tier (Azure Archive, S3 Glacier, or Google Nearline) costs a fraction of hot storage. Questions like this test whether you understand storage tiers, access frequency tradeoffs, and retrieval latency requirements.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which MLS-C01 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related MLS-C01 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Data Engineering practice questions

Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to Data Engineering.

Machine Learning Implementation and Operations practice questions

Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to Machine Learning Implementation and Operations.

Modeling practice questions

Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to Modeling.

Exploratory Data Analysis practice questions

Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to Exploratory Data Analysis.

MLS-C01 fundamentals practice questions

Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to MLS-C01 fundamentals.

MLS-C01 scenario practice questions

Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to MLS-C01 scenario.

MLS-C01 troubleshooting practice questions

Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to MLS-C01 troubleshooting.

Practice this exam

Start a free MLS-C01 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

10 questions 20 questions 30 questions 50 questions Timed 30

MLS-C01 practice-test guide →Study guide →Browse all practice tests

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this MLS-C01 question test?

Exploratory Data Analysis — This question tests Exploratory Data Analysis — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Use pandas with chunksize parameter to iterate through the dataset in chunks, compute per-chunk statistics, and aggregate results; for high-cardinality columns, use value_counts() with dropna=False and then plot the top 20 categories. — Option B is correct because it directly addresses the memory issue by processing data in chunks and handles high-cardinality categorical columns by focusing on top categories, all within the existing pandas environment without additional services. Option A requires PySpark which is not set up on the current instance and adds complexity. Option C, S3 Select, can reduce data size but cannot perform the aggregation needed (e.g., distribution across categories) without pulling all rows; it's more suitable for simple filtering. Option D, SageMaker Data Wrangler, is a separate service that requires additional setup and is not the most efficient for an ad-hoc EDA; it also modifies the workflow.

What should I do if I get this MLS-C01 question wrong?

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

This MLS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLS-C01 exam.