Building a Serverless ETL Pipeline from RDS PostgreSQL to S3 with AWS Glue
A data engineer needs to transform and move 2 TB of data from an Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL instance to Amazon S3 daily. The transformation includes filtering, joining with data in S3, and aggregating. Which AWS services can be used together to accomplish this with minimal operational overhead? (Choose THREE.)
Quick Answer
This 'choose three' question is describing a full ETL pipeline, and the services line up with the three stages any such pipeline needs: a source, a transformation engine, and a destination. AWS Glue is the transformation engine here because it's a serverless ETL service capable of reading from a JDBC source like RDS for PostgreSQL, performing the filtering, joining with data already in S3, and aggregating logic the scenario describes, all without the team having to provision or manage the underlying compute themselves. Amazon S3 serves as the destination, providing durable, cost-effective object storage for the transformed daily output, and it's also part of the join operation itself, since some of the data Glue joins against already lives in S3. Because the requirement explicitly calls for minimal operational overhead, the combination leans on managed, serverless services rather than anything the team would need to provision, patch, or scale by hand, which is a big part of why Glue fits so well for the transformation step instead of a self-managed compute cluster. The pattern to recognize is that ETL-style questions like this one are usually testing whether you can identify the natural source, transform, and destination roles in a pipeline and match each to the AWS service purpose-built for that role, rather than trying to force one service to do more than it's designed for. When a scenario describes filtering, joining, and aggregating data from a relational database before loading it elsewhere, expect Glue to be the transformation layer regardless of which specific source or destination services round out the rest of the pipeline.
⚠ Common exam trap
Watch out — candidates often assume Amazon EMR or Redshift are necessary for large-scale data processing, but AWS Glue's serverless Spark engine can handle 2 TB daily without any cluster management, making it the lower-overhead choice.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Amazon S3
Amazon S3 is correct because it serves as the target storage location for the transformed data. The daily 2 TB output from the ETL pipeline must be stored durably and cost-effectively, and S3 provides the ideal object storage layer for this purpose, especially when combined with AWS Glue for the transformation logic.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Amazon EMR
Why it's wrong here
EMR requires cluster management, increasing overhead.
- ✗
Amazon Redshift
Why it's wrong here
Redshift is a data warehouse, not needed for this pipeline.
- ✓
Amazon S3
Why this is correct
Target storage for transformed data.
- ✓
AWS Glue Data Catalog
Why this is correct
Stores metadata and schema information.
- ✓
AWS Glue
Why this is correct
Serverless ETL service to transform and move data.
Quick reference
AWS S3 Storage Class Comparison
| Storage Class | Min Duration | Retrieval | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| S3 Standard | None | Immediate | Frequently accessed data |
| S3 Standard-IA | 30 days | Immediate | Infrequent access, rapid retrieval |
| S3 One Zone-IA | 30 days | Immediate | Non-critical infrequent data |
| S3 Intelligent-Tiering | None | Immediate–hours | Unknown or changing access patterns |
| S3 Glacier Instant | 90 days | Milliseconds | Archive with instant retrieval |
| S3 Glacier Flexible | 90 days | Minutes–hours | Archive, flexible retrieval |
| S3 Glacier Deep Archive | 180 days | Hours | Long-term compliance archive |
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every MLS-C01 question from scratch — 1,672 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
1 more way this is tested on MLS-C01
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. A data engineer needs to extract data from an Amazon RDS for MySQL database into Amazon S3 for further processing. The data volume is 2 TB and the job must run daily within a 1-hour window. Which AWS service is most suitable for this task?
easy- A.Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose
- B.AWS Database Migration Service (DMS)
- C.Amazon Athena
- ✓ D.AWS Glue
Why D: AWS Glue is the most suitable service because it provides a fully managed ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) capability that can efficiently extract 2 TB of data from Amazon RDS for MySQL and write it to Amazon S3. Glue can leverage JDBC connections to the RDS instance, scale horizontally with its dynamic worker allocation, and complete the job within a 1-hour window by using appropriate worker types (e.g., G.2X or G.8X) and partitioning strategies. Additionally, Glue integrates natively with the AWS Glue Data Catalog and can handle incremental or full-load extraction with minimal overhead.
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This MLS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLS-C01 exam.