Question 169 of 1,755
ModelinghardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is to use SageMaker Neo to compile the model for the target instance, alongside deploying a more powerful instance and applying model pruning. These three actions directly reduce inference latency in SageMaker by optimizing the model’s execution path and computational load: SageMaker Neo compiles the model to leverage hardware-specific instructions, a more powerful instance provides faster compute throughput, and pruning removes redundant parameters to shrink the model size. On the AWS Certified Machine Learning Specialty MLS-C01 exam, this question tests your understanding of real-time inference optimization trade-offs, often appearing as a multi-select trap where you must avoid choosing increased batch size or switching to CPU instances, both of which increase latency. A key memory tip is “Neo, Power, Prune” — think of Neo optimizing the model, Power boosting hardware, and Prune cutting unnecessary weight to hit that 100 ms target.

MLS-C01 Modeling Practice Question

This MLS-C01 practice question tests your understanding of modeling. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A company is using Amazon SageMaker to deploy a model for real-time inference. The model takes 200 ms to respond, but the requirement is 100 ms. Which THREE actions could reduce latency? (Choose THREE.)

Question 1hardmulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Use a larger instance with more compute capacity

Using a more powerful instance reduces compute time. Model pruning reduces model size and computation. SageMaker Neo optimizes models for target hardware. Option D is wrong because increasing batch size increases latency. Option E is wrong because CPU instances are typically slower than GPU for deep learning.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Use a larger instance with more compute capacity

    Why this is correct

    More powerful instances reduce inference time.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Prune the model to remove unnecessary weights

    Why this is correct

    Pruning reduces model complexity and inference time.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Switch to a CPU-based instance

    Why it's wrong here

    CPU instances are generally slower than GPU for deep learning inference.

  • Use SageMaker Neo to compile the model for the target instance

    Why this is correct

    Neo optimizes models for faster inference.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Increase the batch size for inference

    Why it's wrong here

    Larger batch size increases latency per request.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

An e-commerce site experiences heavy traffic on Black Friday and near-zero traffic during off-peak weeks. Rather than provisioning permanent large VMs, the team uses auto-scaling groups that add capacity automatically under load and reduce it overnight. Questions like this test whether you understand elasticity, availability zones, and cloud compute scaling patterns.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which MLS-C01 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related MLS-C01 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free MLS-C01 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this MLS-C01 question test?

Modeling — This question tests Modeling — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Use a larger instance with more compute capacity — Using a more powerful instance reduces compute time. Model pruning reduces model size and computation. SageMaker Neo optimizes models for target hardware. Option D is wrong because increasing batch size increases latency. Option E is wrong because CPU instances are typically slower than GPU for deep learning.

What should I do if I get this MLS-C01 question wrong?

Identify which MLS-C01 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

2 more ways this is tested on MLS-C01

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A company is using Amazon SageMaker to deploy a model for real-time inference. The model requires 500 MB of memory and has a latency requirement of 100 ms. The endpoint is receiving 10 requests per second. Which instance type should be chosen for cost-effectiveness?

medium
  • A.ml.c5.xlarge
  • B.ml.t2.medium
  • C.ml.m5.large
  • D.ml.p3.2xlarge

Why C: Option A is correct because ml.m5.large (2 vCPU, 8 GB) is more than sufficient for memory and throughput, and is cost-effective. Option B is wrong because ml.c5.xlarge (4 vCPU, 8 GB) is more expensive than needed. Option C is wrong because ml.t2.medium (2 vCPU, 4 GB) has enough memory but may have burstable CPU limitations. Option D is wrong because ml.p3.2xlarge is GPU-optimized and overkill.

Variation 2. A company is using Amazon SageMaker to deploy a model for real-time inference. The model receives requests with varying payload sizes. The company observes occasional latency spikes. Which feature can help mitigate this?

easy
  • A.Multi-model endpoints
  • B.Amazon Elastic Inference
  • C.Automatic scaling
  • D.Amazon SageMaker Inference Recommender

Why D: SageMaker Inference Recommender provides load testing and recommendations for instance type and endpoint configuration. It can help identify optimal settings to reduce latency spikes. Multi-model endpoints are for hosting multiple models, not directly for latency spikes. Elastic Inference is for accelerating deep learning inference, not general latency. Automatic scaling adjusts capacity but not per-request latency.

Keep practising

More MLS-C01 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 20, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This MLS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLS-C01 exam.