Question 30 of 1,786
Data Operations and SupportmediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

How to Reduce DS_DIST_ALL_INNER and DS_BCAST_INNER Operations in Redshift

This DEA-C01 practice question tests your understanding of data operations and support. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A data engineer is troubleshooting a slow Amazon Redshift query. The query plan shows a large number of 'DS_DIST_ALL_INNER' and 'DS_BCAST_INNER' operations. Which TWO actions would likely improve query performance?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Change the distribution style of large tables to KEY on the join column.

Option B is correct because using DISTSTYLE KEY on the join column for large tables colocates data with the same key on the same slice, reducing the need for data redistribution operations like DS_DIST_ALL_INNER and DS_BCAST_INNER. Option C is correct because increasing the number of slices by resizing the cluster distributes data across more compute nodes, allowing more parallelism and reducing the relative impact of data redistribution. Option A is incorrect because setting DISTSTYLE to ALL on both tables would broadcast each table to all nodes, increasing data movement and likely worsening performance. Option D is incorrect because SORTKEYs optimize range-restricted scans and sorting, not join data movement. Option E is incorrect because dropping and recreating tables with the same DDL does not change distribution or sort strategies, so it does not address the root cause of excessive redistribution.

Key principle: Count usable hosts — not total addresses — and remember that the network and broadcast addresses are not available to hosts in standard IPv4 subnets.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Set DISTSTYLE to ALL for both tables.

    Why it's wrong here

    ALL distributes entire table to each node, increasing broadcast cost.

  • Change the distribution style of large tables to KEY on the join column.

    Why this is correct

    KEY distribution collocates data on the same slice, reducing redistribution.

    Related concept

    CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

  • Increase the number of slices by resizing the cluster.

    Why this is correct

    More slices reduce the amount of data per slice and improve parallelism.

    Related concept

    CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

  • Define SORTKEYs on the join columns.

    Why it's wrong here

    SORTKEYs help with range scans, not joins.

  • Drop and recreate the tables with the same DDL.

    Why it's wrong here

    Recreating tables with same DDL does not change performance.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: usable hosts are not the same as total addresses

Subnetting questions often tempt you into counting all addresses. In normal IPv4 subnets, the network and broadcast addresses are not usable host addresses.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Subnetting questions test whether you can identify the network, broadcast address, usable range, mask and correct subnet. Slow down enough to calculate the block size correctly.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
  • Block size helps identify subnet boundaries.
  • Network and broadcast addresses are not usable hosts in normal IPv4 subnets.
  • The required host count determines the smallest suitable subnet.

TExam Day Tips

  • Write the block size before choosing the subnet.
  • Check whether the question asks for hosts, subnets or a specific address range.
  • Do not confuse /24, /25, /26 and /27 host counts.

Key takeaway

Count usable hosts — not total addresses — and remember that the network and broadcast addresses are not available to hosts in standard IPv4 subnets.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

An e-commerce site experiences heavy traffic on Black Friday and near-zero traffic during off-peak weeks. Rather than provisioning permanent large VMs, the team uses auto-scaling groups that add capacity automatically under load and reduce it overnight. Questions like this test whether you understand elasticity, availability zones, and cloud compute scaling patterns.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review block sizes, usable host formulas (2^n − 2), and how to find network and broadcast addresses for /24 through /30. Then practise related DEA-C01 subnetting questions on CIDR, address ranges, and subnet selection.

Related practice questions

Related DEA-C01 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free DEA-C01 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this DEA-C01 question test?

Data Operations and Support — This question tests Data Operations and Support — CIDR notation defines the prefix length..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Change the distribution style of large tables to KEY on the join column. — Option B is correct because using DISTSTYLE KEY on the join column for large tables colocates data with the same key on the same slice, reducing the need for data redistribution operations like DS_DIST_ALL_INNER and DS_BCAST_INNER. Option C is correct because increasing the number of slices by resizing the cluster distributes data across more compute nodes, allowing more parallelism and reducing the relative impact of data redistribution. Option A is incorrect because setting DISTSTYLE to ALL on both tables would broadcast each table to all nodes, increasing data movement and likely worsening performance. Option D is incorrect because SORTKEYs optimize range-restricted scans and sorting, not join data movement. Option E is incorrect because dropping and recreating tables with the same DDL does not change distribution or sort strategies, so it does not address the root cause of excessive redistribution.

What should I do if I get this DEA-C01 question wrong?

Review block sizes, usable host formulas (2^n − 2), and how to find network and broadcast addresses for /24 through /30. Then practise related DEA-C01 subnetting questions on CIDR, address ranges, and subnet selection.

What is the key concept behind this question?

CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

2 more ways this is tested on DEA-C01

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A data engineer is troubleshooting a slow-running Amazon Redshift query. The query joins several large tables and performs aggregations. The engineer runs EXPLAIN and sees a 'DS_DIST_ALL' step. Which TWO actions will MOST likely improve query performance? (Choose TWO.)

hard
  • A.Run the VACUUM command on all tables.
  • B.Use the CNAME command to rename the tables.
  • C.Change the distribution style of the tables to DISTSTYLE KEY on the join columns.
  • D.Increase the number of nodes in the Redshift cluster.
  • E.Define appropriate SORTKEYs on the tables based on the query predicates.

Why C: The DS_DIST_ALL step in the query plan indicates that data is being broadcast from one node to all others, causing significant network overhead. Option C is correct because changing the distribution style to DISTSTYLE KEY on the join columns ensures that matching rows are co-located on the same node, reducing the need for redistribution. Option E is correct because defining appropriate SORTKEYs based on query predicates allows the query optimizer to use zone maps to skip irrelevant blocks, speeding up scans and aggregations. Option A is incorrect; VACUUM reorganizes data on disk but does not affect distribution. Option B is incorrect; CNAME is a DNS record type, not a Redshift command. Option D is incorrect; increasing nodes might not directly fix the distribution issue and is less targeted than changing distribution style.

Variation 2. A data engineer is troubleshooting a slow-running Amazon Redshift query. The query involves a large fact table with a distribution style of EVEN and a sort key on date. The table has 10 slices. The engineer notices that the query is performing a broadcast join with a small dimension table. Which change would most improve performance?

hard
  • A.Remove the sort key and use a compound sort key on the join column
  • B.Change the dimension table to DISTSTYLE ALL
  • C.Increase the number of slices by resizing the cluster
  • D.Change the fact table to DISTSTYLE KEY on the join column

Why D: Option D is correct because changing the fact table's distribution style to KEY on the join column co-locates the rows from both tables on the same compute nodes, significantly reducing the need for data movement during the join. A broadcast join moves the entire small dimension table to every slice, which is inefficient; KEY distribution on the fact table aligns the join keys across nodes, enabling a distributed join without broadcasting. Option A is wrong: removing the sort key would hurt range-based filtering performance and the suggestion of a compound sort key on the join column does not address data distribution. Option B is wrong: although ALL distribution on the small dimension table is a good practice, the question asks for a change that most improves performance for this specific scenario; it is less effective than fixing the fact table distribution. Option C is wrong: increasing slices by resizing the cluster does not change the distribution or join strategy; it only adds more parallelism but still requires broadcasting.

Keep practising

More DEA-C01 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 20, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This DEA-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DEA-C01 exam.