Courseiva
Security and CompliancemediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CLF-C02 Security and Compliance Practice Question

A company hosts a public-facing web application on Amazon EC2 instances behind an Application Load Balancer. The security team has noticed an increase in volumetric distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks targeting the application's IP address. The company wants a managed AWS service that provides automatic, always-on protection against common network-layer DDoS attacks at no additional cost. Which AWS service should the company use?

⚠ Common exam trap

Test-takers frequently confuse AWS WAF (Layer 7) with network-layer DDoS protection, or assume Shield Advanced is required for any DDoS protection, when Shield Standard already provides free, automatic coverage for common volumetric attacks at Layer 3/4.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

AWS Shield Standard

AWS Shield Standard is the correct choice because it provides automatic, always-on protection against common network-layer (Layer 3/4) DDoS attacks, such as SYN floods and UDP reflection attacks, at no additional cost. It is integrated with Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon CloudFront, and Amazon Route 53, making it ideal for protecting a public-facing web application behind an Application Load Balancer without requiring any configuration or extra fees.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • AWS WAF

    Why it's wrong here

    AWS WAF is a web application firewall that operates at Layer 7, inspecting HTTP/HTTPS requests to block application-layer threats such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and bot traffic. It does not mitigate volumetric network-layer DDoS attacks that saturate bandwidth or exhaust network resources, which is the core problem Shield Standard addresses. Additionally, WAF incurs charges for the rules you create and the requests you process, so it would not satisfy the 'no additional cost' constraint even if it were the right tool for this attack type.

    When this WOULD be correct

    When a company needs to protect a web application from common web exploits like SQL injection or cross-site scripting, and requires customizable rules to filter HTTP/S requests, AWS WAF would be the correct answer.

  • AWS Shield Standard

    Why this is correct

    AWS Shield Standard is a free, always-on service that automatically detects and mitigates common network-layer and transport-layer DDoS attacks, including SYN floods, UDP reflections, and amplification attacks. Because it is enabled by default for every AWS customer and requires no configuration, it protects a public web application on EC2 with no additional cost. Shield Standard automatically covers the Elastic IP and public interfaces of EC2, directly meeting the company's requirement for zero additional expense while addressing the network-layer DDoS threat.

  • AWS Shield Advanced

    Why it's wrong here

    AWS Shield Advanced provides enhanced DDoS protection, including cost protection, access to the DDoS Response Team, and near real-time visibility, but it is a paid service. The company specifically wants a service at no additional cost, so Shield Advanced does not meet that requirement.

    When this WOULD be correct

    AWS Shield Advanced would be correct if the question specified a need for enhanced protection against sophisticated DDoS attacks, 24/7 access to the DDoS Response Team (DRT), cost protection against scaling charges, or integration with AWS WAF for web-layer attacks, and the company is willing to pay the associated fee.

  • AWS Network Firewall

    Why it's wrong here

    AWS Network Firewall is a managed firewall service that provides stateful inspection, intrusion prevention, and traffic filtering. It is not designed to specifically mitigate DDoS attacks and does not provide always-on, automatic DDoS protection at no cost.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A company needs to deploy stateful firewall rules to inspect and filter inbound and outbound traffic at the VPC level, such as blocking traffic from specific IP addresses or enforcing domain-based filtering. The question would specify requirements for deep packet inspection or network traffic filtering beyond DDoS protection.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The CLF-C02 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

AWS Shield StandardCorrect answer

Why this is correct

AWS Shield Standard is a free, always-on service that automatically detects and mitigates common network-layer and transport-layer DDoS attacks, including SYN floods, UDP reflections, and amplification attacks. Because it is enabled by default for every AWS customer and requires no configuration, it protects a public web application on EC2 with no additional cost. Shield Standard automatically covers the Elastic IP and public interfaces of EC2, directly meeting the company's requirement for zero additional expense while addressing the network-layer DDoS threat.

AWS WAFWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

AWS WAF is a web application firewall that protects against application-layer attacks (e.g., SQL injection, cross-site scripting), not volumetric network-layer DDoS attacks. The question specifies network-layer DDoS protection, which AWS WAF does not provide.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

When a company needs to protect a web application from common web exploits like SQL injection or cross-site scripting, and requires customizable rules to filter HTTP/S requests, AWS WAF would be the correct answer.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse WAF's DDoS protection capabilities (it can mitigate some application-layer DDoS) with network-layer DDoS protection, or assume any DDoS protection requires WAF.

AWS Shield AdvancedWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

AWS Shield Advanced is a paid service ($3,000/month) and does not provide automatic, always-on protection at no additional cost, which contradicts the question's requirement for no additional cost.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

AWS Shield Advanced would be correct if the question specified a need for enhanced protection against sophisticated DDoS attacks, 24/7 access to the DDoS Response Team (DRT), cost protection against scaling charges, or integration with AWS WAF for web-layer attacks, and the company is willing to pay the associated fee.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse Shield Advanced with Shield Standard, assuming 'Advanced' implies better protection without realizing it incurs additional cost, or they may think all DDoS protection from AWS is free.

AWS Network FirewallWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

AWS Network Firewall is a managed firewall service for VPC traffic inspection and filtering, but it does not provide automatic, always-on DDoS protection at no additional cost. It is not designed to mitigate volumetric DDoS attacks at the network layer.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A company needs to deploy stateful firewall rules to inspect and filter inbound and outbound traffic at the VPC level, such as blocking traffic from specific IP addresses or enforcing domain-based filtering. The question would specify requirements for deep packet inspection or network traffic filtering beyond DDoS protection.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse Network Firewall with a DDoS protection service because it is a security service that can filter traffic, but they overlook that it lacks the automatic, always-on DDoS mitigation capabilities of AWS Shield Standard.

Analysis generated from the official CLF-C02blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Visual reference

Client Server SYN (seq=100) SYN-ACK (seq=200, ack=101) ACK (ack=201) Connection established — data transfer begins

About these practice questions

One of 988 original CLF-C02 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CLF-C02 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CLF-C02 exam.