IP AddressingCCNA 200-301

Overlapping Subnets Causing Routing Ambiguity

Presenting Symptom

Users in the branch office report intermittent connectivity to the data center, with some traffic succeeding and other traffic failing unpredictably.

Network Context

A small branch office with a single Cisco 4321 router (IOS XE 16.9) connects to an enterprise data center via two WAN links: primary MPLS (10.0.0.0/24) and backup Internet VPN (192.168.1.0/24). The branch LAN uses 10.0.0.0/24, and the data center LAN uses 172.16.0.0/24. The branch router runs EIGRP with the data center router. The network engineer notices that pings to the data center sometimes fail and routing table entries appear inconsistent.

Diagnostic Steps

1

Check the routing table for the destination network

show ip route 172.16.0.0
Routing entry for 172.16.0.0/24
  Known via "eigrp 100", distance 90, metric 28160, type internal
  Last update from 10.0.0.2 on GigabitEthernet0/0, 00:00:15 ago
  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
  * 10.0.0.2, from 10.0.0.2, 00:00:15 ago, via GigabitEthernet0/0
      Route metric is 28160, traffic share count is 1
  Also advertised via eigrp 100
  Also advertised via eigrp 100
  Also advertised via eigrp 100

The routing table shows only one path via 10.0.0.2. If there were overlapping subnets, you might see multiple entries or unexpected next hops. Here it looks normal, but the problem may be intermittent.

2

Examine the routing table for all networks to identify overlaps

show ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route

Gateway of last resort is not set

     10.0.0.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C       10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/1
D       10.0.0.0/24 is a summary, 00:00:05, Null0
     172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D       172.16.0.0/24 [90/28160] via 10.0.0.2, 00:00:15, GigabitEthernet0/0

Notice that 10.0.0.0/24 appears twice: once as a connected route on G0/1 (LAN) and once as an EIGRP summary route to Null0. This indicates that the router is summarizing the 10.0.0.0/24 network, which may be overlapping with the WAN subnet (also 10.0.0.0/24). The summary route to Null0 can cause traffic to be dropped if the router thinks it has a better path.

3

Check EIGRP interfaces and neighbors to see which networks are advertised

show ip eigrp interfaces
EIGRP interfaces for process 100
                        Xmit Queue   Mean   Pacing Time   Multicast    Pending
Interface        Peers  Un/Reliable  SRTT   Un/Reliable   Flow Timer   Routes
Gi0/0              1       0/0       12       0/10         50           0
Gi0/1              0       0/0       0        0/10         0            0

GigabitEthernet0/1 (LAN) has no EIGRP peers, which is expected. However, the router may be advertising the LAN subnet (10.0.0.0/24) into EIGRP, causing the data center router to see two paths to 10.0.0.0/24 (the WAN link and the branch LAN). This can cause routing ambiguity.

4

Verify EIGRP topology table for the overlapping network

show ip eigrp topology 10.0.0.0/24
EIGRP-IPv4 Topology Entry for AS(100)/ID(10.0.0.1) for 10.0.0.0/24
  State: Passive, Query origin flag: 1, 1 Successor(s), FD is 28160
  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
  0.0.0.0, from Null0, Send flag is 0x0
      Composite metric is (28160/0), Route is Internal
      Vector metric:
        Minimum bandwidth is 100000 Kbit
        Total delay is 100 microseconds
        Reliability is 255/255
        Load is 1/255
        Minimum MTU is 1500
        Hop count is 1
  10.0.0.2, from 10.0.0.2, Send flag is 0x0
      Composite metric is (28160/0), Route is Internal
      Vector metric:
        Minimum bandwidth is 100000 Kbit
        Total delay is 100 microseconds
        Reliability is 255/255
        Load is 1/255
        Minimum MTU is 1500
        Hop count is 1

The topology table shows two entries for 10.0.0.0/24: one via Null0 (the summary route) and one via 10.0.0.2 (the WAN neighbor). This confirms that the router is summarizing the LAN subnet and also learning the same subnet from the WAN, creating an overlap. The router may prefer the Null0 route, causing traffic to be dropped.

Root Cause

The branch router has an EIGRP summary route configured for 10.0.0.0/24 (the LAN subnet) on the WAN interface (GigabitEthernet0/0). This summary route is advertised to the data center router, which then sees two paths to 10.0.0.0/24: one via the WAN link and one via the branch LAN. However, the branch router itself installs the summary route to Null0, which can cause traffic destined for 10.0.0.0/24 (including the WAN link itself) to be dropped because the router thinks it has a directly connected summary route. Additionally, the WAN link uses the same subnet (10.0.0.0/24) as the LAN, causing an address overlap.

Resolution

1. Remove the EIGRP summary route on the WAN interface: interface GigabitEthernet0/0 no ip summary-address eigrp 100 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 2. Change the LAN subnet to a non-overlapping range (e.g., 192.168.10.0/24): interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0 no ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 3. Update EIGRP to advertise the new LAN subnet: router eigrp 100 network 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 no network 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 4. Clear EIGRP neighbors to refresh routes: clear ip eigrp neighbors

Verification

1. Verify the routing table no longer shows overlapping entries: show ip route | include 10.0.0.0 Expected output: Only the WAN interface subnet (e.g., 10.0.0.0/24 via connected) should appear, no Null0 route. 2. Verify EIGRP topology for the old LAN subnet is gone: show ip eigrp topology 10.0.0.0/24 Expected output: % Entry not found 3. Test connectivity from branch to data center: ping 172.16.0.1 source 192.168.10.1 Expected output: Success (!!!!!)

Prevention

1. Use unique IP subnets for each network segment (LAN, WAN, loopbacks) to avoid overlaps. 2. Avoid using the same subnet for both LAN and WAN links. 3. When using EIGRP summarization, ensure summary routes do not mask the WAN subnet or create Null0 routes that drop traffic.

CCNA Exam Relevance

On the CCNA 200-301 exam, this scenario may appear as a troubleshooting question where you must identify overlapping subnets causing routing issues. The exam tests your ability to interpret show ip route and show ip eigrp topology output to find misconfigurations. Key fact: EIGRP summary routes to Null0 can cause traffic blackholing if they overlap with learned routes.

Exam Tips

1.

Remember that a route to Null0 in the routing table indicates a summary route that can drop traffic if it overlaps with a real network.

2.

When you see two entries for the same subnet with different next hops (one being Null0), suspect an EIGRP summary misconfiguration.

3.

The command 'show ip route' is your first step; look for 'is a summary' in the output to identify summary routes.

Commands Used in This Scenario

Test Your CCNA Knowledge

Practice with scenario-based questions to prepare for the CCNA 200-301 exam.

Practice CCNA Questions