UiPath-ADAv1 Version Control and Libraries Practice Question
A developer is working on a shared library project in UiPath Studio. After pushing changes to the remote Git repository, the CI/CD pipeline fails to package the library. What is the most likely cause of this failure?
⚠ Common exam trap
Candidates frequently forget that NuGet packages are immutable; they assume that pushing changes to Git automatically triggers a new package version without updating the project.json file's version string.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
The project.json file contains an identical version number to the previously published version.
Library projects require specific metadata in the project.json file to be packaged correctly for Orchestrator. When a developer pushes changes, they must ensure the versioning and dependencies are updated according to the library's lifecycle requirements. Failure to increment the version number or resolve missing dependencies in the project settings will cause the NuGet packaging step to fail during the automated build process, preventing deployment to the tenant feed.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
The project.json file contains an identical version number to the previously published version.
Why this is correct
NuGet feeds require unique versions for each package. If the version number remains the same as an existing package, the server rejects the upload. Developers must increment the version number in the project settings or via CI/CD parameters to ensure successful publishing to the Orchestrator library feed.
- ✗
The Git repository is configured with a local branch that is not tracking the origin/main branch.
Why it's wrong here
While branch tracking issues affect local development and pushing code, they do not directly cause a packaging failure during the CI/CD phase if the code has already reached the server. The pipeline typically triggers on the commit, not on the specific local branch tracking configuration.
- ✗
The developer did not commit the 'project.json' file along with the workflow changes.
Why it's wrong here
If the project.json was not committed, the repository would still reflect the state of the last successful build. The pipeline would simply build the old version again rather than failing, assuming the existing files were valid and consistent with the repository state at the time of commit.
- ✗
There are local uncommitted changes residing in the 'Library' folder on the developer machine.
Why it's wrong here
Local uncommitted changes on a developer's machine have no impact on the server-side CI/CD pipeline. The pipeline runs against the code committed and pushed to the remote repository, ignoring any local files or modifications that the developer has not yet explicitly pushed to the repository.
Visual reference
About these practice questions
This UiPath-ADAv1 question is part of Courseiva's 285-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official UiPath exam blueprint
This UiPath-ADAv1 practice question is part of Courseiva's free UiPath certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the UiPath-ADAv1 exam.