Courseiva
Data Movement →hardMultiple Choice

DEA-C02 Data Movement Practice Question

A data engineer is unloading a large fact table to an external stage and wants to minimize the total volume of data transferred while keeping files readable by downstream tools. The table contains many repeated values in several columns. Which approach best reduces the unloaded data size?

⚠ Common exam trap

The trap here is focusing on compression codecs alone; the bigger size win comes from the columnar encoding of repeated values, which only Parquet provides among the choices.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Unload with FILE_FORMAT = (TYPE = PARQUET COMPRESSION = SNAPPY).

Parquet with SNAPPY compression gives the best size reduction because its columnar layout and per-column encodings efficiently handle repeated values, and SNAPPY compresses the encoded blocks. CSV, JSON, and file-count tuning do not exploit column repetition, so they leave far more data to transfer for the same table.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✓

    Unload with FILE_FORMAT = (TYPE = PARQUET COMPRESSION = SNAPPY).

    Why this is correct

    Parquet is a columnar format that applies per-column encodings such as dictionary and run-length encoding, which greatly shrink columns with many repeated values, and SNAPPY adds block compression on top. This yields the smallest transfer volume while remaining readable by common analytics and ML tools.

  • ✗

    Unload with FILE_FORMAT = (TYPE = JSON COMPRESSION = GZIP).

    Why it's wrong here

    JSON stores each value with its key name repeated in every record, which inflates the raw payload, and GZIP cannot recover that overhead. For a wide table with many repeated values, JSON output is usually substantially larger than a columnar format and is also slower for downstream tools to parse.

  • ✗

    Unload with FILE_FORMAT = (TYPE = CSV COMPRESSION = GZIP).

    Why it's wrong here

    CSV with GZIP does compress the data, but because CSV is row-oriented and stores repeated values verbatim in every row, it cannot exploit the repetition across rows nearly as well as a columnar format with dictionary encoding. The resulting files are typically much larger than Parquet for low-cardinality columns.

  • ✗

    Increase MAX_FILE_SIZE so fewer, larger files are produced.

    Why it's wrong here

    MAX_FILE_SIZE controls how the unloaded rows are split into files; it does not change the encoding or compression of the content. Producing fewer, larger files may reduce per-file overhead slightly, but it will not achieve the significant size reduction that columnar encoding and compression provide.

About these practice questions

This DEA-C02 question is part of Courseiva's 229-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Snowflake exam blueprint

This DEA-C02 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Snowflake certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DEA-C02 exam.