Courseiva
Application Rules, ACL and NotificationsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

SNOW-CSA Application Rules, ACL and Notifications Practice Question

Exhibit

ACL Rule: incident.*
Name: incident.read
Type: record
Operation: read
Condition: gs.hasRole('snc_internal') || gs.getUserID() == 'admin'

Script debug:
gs.hasRole('snc_internal') returns false
gs.getUserID() returns 'john.doe'

User 'john.doe' is a member of role 'itil' only.

Refer to the exhibit. A user with username 'john.doe' tries to view an incident record. What is the outcome?

⚠ Common exam trap

It's easy for candidates to assume having the 'itil' role guarantees read access to all incidents, but ServiceNow ACLs can deny access even to users with the correct role if a condition evaluates to false.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The user cannot view the incident because the ACL condition evaluates to false.

The ACL condition on the incident table evaluates to false for user 'john.doe'. In ServiceNow, an ACL (Access Control List) with a condition that returns false prevents the user from viewing the record, even if they have a role like 'itil'. The exhibit likely shows an ACL with a condition such as 'true == false' or a script that returns false, which overrides any role-based access.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The user can view the incident because no ACLs apply to incident table.

    Why it's wrong here

    The ACL exists.

  • The user can view the incident because they have the itil role.

    Why it's wrong here

    The ACL does not check itil role.

  • The user cannot view the incident because the ACL is missing a condition for itil role.

    Why it's wrong here

    ACLs are configured per requirement; missing a role does not cause denial by default.

  • The user cannot view the incident because the ACL condition evaluates to false.

    Why this is correct

    Both conditions are false, so read is denied.

Visual reference

Source Router + ACL permit 10.0.0.0/8 deny any Server 10.0.0.5 ✓ 192.168.1.1 ✗ dropped ACLs evaluate top-down; first match wins — implicit deny all at end

Quick reference

Access Control Model Comparison

ModelAcronymWho Controls Access?Best For
Discretionary Access ControlDACResource ownerSmall teams, file shares
Mandatory Access ControlMACSystem / security labelsClassified govt / military
Role-Based Access ControlRBACAdministrator (via roles)Enterprise environments
Attribute-Based Access ControlABACPolicy engine (user + resource attributes)Fine-grained, dynamic policies
Rule-Based Access ControlRuBACSystem rules / ACLsFirewall rules, network ACLs

About these practice questions

One of 504 original SNOW-CSA practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This SNOW-CSA practice question is part of Courseiva's free ServiceNow certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SNOW-CSA exam.