SSM Supporting Team Events Practice Question
Which of these is the most appropriate purpose of the Iteration Review?
⚠ Common exam trap
Candidates frequently select options that describe internal team status reviews or code quality checks, forgetting that the Iteration Review is specifically outward-facing for stakeholders and customer feedback.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
To demonstrate the working software to stakeholders and gather their feedback.
The Iteration Review is a collaborative event for the team to show their work to stakeholders, gather feedback, and adjust the backlog. It serves as a vital feedback loop that ensures the team is building the right product for the customer. Without this event, the team risks spending time on features that do not align with user needs or current business priorities.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
To provide a status update to management on how many stories were finished.
Why it's wrong here
While velocity data is tracked, the Review is not a status report for management; it is a demonstration of value for stakeholders. The focus must be on the product, the feedback received, and the future backlog, rather than just reporting on metrics that management could easily see in other tools.
- ✓
To demonstrate the working software to stakeholders and gather their feedback.
Why this is correct
The primary intent of the review is to inspect the increment and adapt the product backlog based on stakeholder input. This ensures the team stays aligned with customer needs and business objectives. It is the best opportunity to validate that the team's work is actually delivering the desired value.
- ✗
To identify process improvements for the team's internal way of working.
Why it's wrong here
Process improvement is the domain of the Iteration Retrospective, not the Review. Mixing these two events leads to unfocused meetings where neither the product nor the team's processes get the attention they deserve. The Review must remain focused on the product and stakeholder engagement for maximum impact.
- ✗
To discuss and resolve all technical blockers encountered during the iteration.
Why it's wrong here
Technical blockers should be addressed during the Daily Stand-up or in dedicated sync meetings, not the Review. Using the Review to discuss internal technical issues wastes the time of stakeholders who are there to provide product feedback. The focus must remain on the customer-facing aspects of the iteration's output.
About these practice questions
This SSM question is part of Courseiva's 385-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Scaled Agile exam blueprint
This SSM practice question is part of Courseiva's free Scaled Agile certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SSM exam.