SSM Supporting Team Events Practice Question
During a team's Iteration Retrospective, the Scrum Master notices that two team members dominate the conversation while quieter members remain silent. The team must produce actionable improvement items before the timebox ends. What is the most effective facilitation action for the Scrum Master to take?
⚠ Common exam trap
The trap here is assuming the Scrum Master should directly manage who speaks or extend the meeting, when the effective move is to change the facilitation format so the team self-balances participation.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Use a structured format such as silent brainstorming or round-robin to ensure all voices contribute before grouping and prioritizing actions.
The Scrum Master facilitates the retrospective so the team can inspect its process and choose improvements. When a few voices dominate, changing the format to silent brainstorming or round-robin broadens participation without directing content. This preserves team ownership, respects the timebox, and yields actionable items that the whole team understands and supports.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Ask the dominant members to stop talking so the Scrum Master can interview each silent member one by one.
Why it's wrong here
Publicly singling out dominant members and then interviewing silent ones puts individuals on the spot, which can increase anxiety and reduce candor. It also shifts the Scrum Master into directing content rather than facilitating the team's own process. The retrospective belongs to the team; the Scrum Master should adjust the format, not police individual participation or conduct one-on-one interviews during the event.
- ✗
Extend the retrospective beyond its timebox until every person has spoken at least twice.
Why it's wrong here
Extending the timebox undermines the team's agreement and SAFe's emphasis on keeping events timeboxed. A mandatory speaking quota can produce forced, low-quality input and may feel punitive. The better approach is to change the format so participation naturally broadens, rather than lengthening the meeting or imposing artificial rules about how many times each person must speak.
- ✗
Record only the dominant members' suggestions and ask the quieter members to submit written feedback after the retrospective.
Why it's wrong here
Deferring quieter members to after-the-fact written feedback excludes them from the real-time dialogue where ideas are clarified, combined, and prioritized. It also privileges the dominant voices' input, reducing ownership and transparency. The Scrum Master should adjust the in-event format to gather everyone's perspective while the team can still act on it together within the timebox.
- ✓
Use a structured format such as silent brainstorming or round-robin to ensure all voices contribute before grouping and prioritizing actions.
Why this is correct
Structured formats like silent brainstorming or round-robin deliberately create space for every team member, including quieter ones, to contribute ideas without being overshadowed. This increases psychological safety and produces a broader set of improvement candidates, which the team can then group and prioritize within the remaining timebox. It keeps the retrospective owned by the team while the Scrum Master facilitates rather than directs content.
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every SSM question from scratch — 385 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Scaled Agile exam blueprint
This SSM practice question is part of Courseiva's free Scaled Agile certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SSM exam.