C_CPI Integration Suite Development Practice Question
An integration developer needs to expose an integration flow in SAP Cloud Integration so that an external partner can send messages to it using a simple HTTP POST request without authentication. The developer wants the quickest way to make the flow callable during a proof of concept. Which sender adapter should the developer use?
⚠ Common exam trap
The trap here is overcomplicating a proof-of-concept endpoint with authentication mechanisms, when a plain HTTP sender adapter with no auth and CSRF disabled is sufficient for initial testing.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
HTTP sender adapter with CSRF protection disabled and no authentication configured.
The HTTP sender adapter is the correct choice because it can be configured without authentication and with CSRF protection disabled, enabling an external partner to send a plain HTTP POST to the integration flow endpoint. This is the simplest way to expose a flow for a proof of concept, avoiding certificate exchanges or token configuration that other adapters would require.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
IDoc sender adapter with a partner profile configured for inbound processing.
Why it's wrong here
The IDoc sender adapter is designed for SAP ALE/IDoc communication, not for simple HTTP POST requests from external partners. It requires IDoc structure and partner profile configuration, which is far more involved and unrelated to a lightweight proof of concept. This adapter cannot accept a plain HTTP POST and therefore does not meet the scenario's requirements.
- ✓
HTTP sender adapter with CSRF protection disabled and no authentication configured.
Why this is correct
The HTTP sender adapter can be configured with no authentication and CSRF protection disabled, allowing an external partner to send a simple HTTP POST directly to the integration flow endpoint. This is the fastest way to make the flow callable during a proof of concept, matching the requirement for an unauthenticated, straightforward HTTP interface without certificate or token setup.
- ✗
SOAP sender adapter with WS-Security UsernameToken.
Why it's wrong here
The SOAP sender adapter expects SOAP envelopes and WS-Security headers, not simple HTTP POST requests. Configuring WS-Security UsernameToken also adds authentication complexity. This adapter is appropriate for SOAP-based web services but does not satisfy the scenario's need for a quick, unauthenticated HTTP endpoint for a proof of concept.
- ✗
HTTPS sender adapter with Client Certificate authentication.
Why it's wrong here
The HTTPS sender adapter with Client Certificate authentication requires the partner to present a valid client certificate, which involves certificate exchange and trust configuration. This is more complex than the scenario requires for a quick proof of concept without authentication. While it is secure and suitable for production, it does not meet the requirement of a simple, unauthenticated HTTP POST during initial testing.
About these practice questions
One of 218 original C_CPI practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official SAP exam blueprint
This C_CPI practice question is part of Courseiva's free SAP certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the C_CPI exam.