C_CPI Integration Suite Development Practice Question
An integration developer is building an integration flow in SAP Cloud Integration that must process each order in a large XML payload individually. The payload contains an Orders root element with many Order child elements. The developer adds an Iterating Splitter step and configures the XPath expression as /Orders/Order. During testing, the flow fails to process the messages as expected. What is the most likely cause?
⚠ Common exam trap
The trap here is assuming the splitter silently handles mismatched XPath or that extra options like streaming or trailing slashes fix a structural mismatch.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
The XPath expression must be entered as an absolute path with the correct case and element names, and the payload must match the structure exactly.
The Iterating Splitter evaluates the XPath expression against the incoming message. If the expression does not match any nodes due to case differences, wrong element names, or a different hierarchy, the splitter produces no messages or fails. Verifying that /Orders/Order matches the payload exactly resolves the issue.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
The Iterating Splitter step requires the XPath expression to be wrapped in a namespace prefix, even when no namespaces are used.
Why it's wrong here
Namespace prefixes are only required when the source XML actually uses namespaces. For a payload without namespaces, XPath expressions like /Orders/Order are valid. The Iterating Splitter does not mandate artificial prefixes, so this is not the cause of the failure.
- ✓
The XPath expression must be entered as an absolute path with the correct case and element names, and the payload must match the structure exactly.
Why this is correct
The Iterating Splitter uses XPath 1.0, which is case-sensitive and requires exact element names. If the payload uses different casing or a different root element, or if the expression is not an absolute path, no nodes are selected. The developer must ensure /Orders/Order matches the actual XML structure.
- ✗
The Iterating Splitter step must use the Streaming XPath option for large payloads, otherwise it silently drops messages.
Why it's wrong here
The Streaming XPath option is an optimization for very large messages and does not change basic splitter behavior. Using non-streaming XPath does not cause messages to be dropped. The developer should first verify the XPath expression and payload structure before considering streaming options.
- ✗
The XPath expression must be specified as /Orders/Order/ with a trailing slash to select all Order elements.
Why it's wrong here
A trailing slash in XPath does not select child elements; it would actually point to a non-existent child of Order. Correct XPath for selecting all Order elements under Orders is /Orders/Order without a trailing slash. Adding a trailing slash would make the expression invalid or select nothing.
Visual reference
About these practice questions
This C_CPI question is part of Courseiva's 218-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official SAP exam blueprint
This C_CPI practice question is part of Courseiva's free SAP certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the C_CPI exam.