C_TS4FI Financial Accounting Practice Question
An accounts payable accountant is posting a vendor invoice in SAP S/4HANA and needs the payment terms to be defaulted from the vendor master record while still allowing an override on the invoice itself. Which configuration in the vendor master ensures that payment terms are proposed but remain changeable at the time of invoice entry?
⚠ Common exam trap
Many candidates confuse field status or account group mandatory settings with the default-and-override behavior of master data fields during transaction entry.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Maintain the payment terms field in the vendor master's Company Code data section as a default, which the invoice entry screen proposes but does not lock
Payment terms maintained in the vendor master's Company Code segment are proposed automatically during invoice entry but remain editable. This provides an efficient default while preserving the flexibility to adjust terms for specific documents, which is the behavior the accountant requires. Field status and account group settings govern availability, not this default-and-override logic.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Create a substitution rule in Financial Accounting that copies payment terms from the vendor master to every invoice line
Why it's wrong here
Substitution rules can derive or replace values during posting, but using one to force vendor master terms would override any manual entry and remove the flexibility the accountant needs. A substitution is also a validation-level tool, not the standard mechanism for proposing changeable defaults from master data.
- ✓
Maintain the payment terms field in the vendor master's Company Code data section as a default, which the invoice entry screen proposes but does not lock
Why this is correct
Payment terms stored in the vendor master Company Code segment are proposed as defaults when entering an invoice. The field remains open for editing on the invoice, so the accountant can override terms for a specific document while still benefiting from master data defaults, which matches the stated requirement exactly.
- ✗
Set the payment terms field in the vendor master as a required entry field using field status configuration
Why it's wrong here
Making payment terms a required field forces the user to supply a value but does not make the master data value a changeable default. Field status controls whether a field is suppressed, required, or optional during entry, not whether the master value is proposed and overridable, so it does not address the scenario.
- ✗
Activate the payment terms field as a mandatory field in the vendor account group configuration
Why it's wrong here
The account group controls which fields are available and required when creating the vendor master record itself, not how those values behave during invoice entry. Marking payment terms mandatory in the account group affects master data creation, not the invoice screen's default-and-override behavior.
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every C_TS4FI question from scratch — 207 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official SAP exam blueprint
This C_TS4FI practice question is part of Courseiva's free SAP certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the C_TS4FI exam.