Question 42 of 518
Transform data with filters and pluginshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

EX294 Transform data with filters and plugins Practice Question

This EX294 practice question tests your understanding of transform data with filters and plugins. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A team is migrating from static inventory to dynamic inventory using a custom script. The script returns JSON with a group 'webservers' containing hosts. However, the playbook targeting 'webservers' fails with 'no hosts matched'. Which filter or plugin issue is most likely?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Read the full Ansible explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The script output is missing the '_meta' key with 'hostvars'.

Dynamic inventory scripts must include a `_meta` key with `hostvars` in their JSON output for Ansible to properly resolve host variables and match hosts to groups. Without `_meta`, Ansible cannot associate host-specific variables (like `ansible_host`) with the hosts listed under `webservers`, causing the playbook to see no matched hosts even though the group exists.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The playbook uses 'hosts: all' but should use 'hosts: webservers'.

    Why it's wrong here

    The playbook already targets webservers, so this is not the issue.

  • The script is not executable.

    Why it's wrong here

    If not executable, Ansible would report an error, not 'no hosts matched'.

  • The 'ansible_host' variable is not set in hostvars.

    Why it's wrong here

    Missing ansible_host causes connection issues, but hosts would still be matched.

  • The script output is missing the '_meta' key with 'hostvars'.

    Why this is correct

    Dynamic inventory scripts require _meta structure; without it, Ansible may not recognize hosts.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Red Hat often tests the misconception that 'no hosts matched' is caused by a missing group or incorrect host targeting, when in reality it is a dynamic inventory protocol compliance issue—specifically the absence of the `_meta` key in the script output.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Ansible's dynamic inventory protocol requires that the script output include a top-level `_meta` dictionary containing `hostvars` for each host. Without `_meta`, Ansible treats the inventory as a static list of group-to-host mappings but cannot resolve host variables, leading to a mismatch where hosts are defined but not considered 'matched' because the inventory parser cannot associate them with playbook targets. In real-world scenarios, custom scripts often forget `_meta` when migrating from static files, especially if they only output group/host lists without variable metadata.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the EX294 exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related EX294 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free EX294 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this EX294 question test?

Transform data with filters and plugins — This question tests Transform data with filters and plugins — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The script output is missing the '_meta' key with 'hostvars'. — Dynamic inventory scripts must include a `_meta` key with `hostvars` in their JSON output for Ansible to properly resolve host variables and match hosts to groups. Without `_meta`, Ansible cannot associate host-specific variables (like `ansible_host`) with the hosts listed under `webservers`, causing the playbook to see no matched hosts even though the group exists.

What should I do if I get this EX294 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This EX294 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Red Hat certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the EX294 exam.