Courseiva
Question 445 of 498
Control Flow, Loops, Lists and LogichardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

PCEP Control Flow, Loops, Lists and Logic Practice Question

A network administrator uses a Python script to analyze firewall logs. The script reads a CSV file with columns 'src_ip', 'dst_ip', 'action', 'time'. It needs to build a list of source IPs that have been blocked more than 3 times. The current code:

blocked_count = {} blocked_ips = []

for row in logs:
    if row['action'] == 'block':
        if row['src_ip'] in blocked_count:

blocked_count[row['src_ip']] += 1 else: blocked_count[row['src_ip']] = 1

for ip, count in blocked_count.items():
    if count > 3:

blocked_ips.append(ip)

The script runs correctly but slowly on large logs. The administrator wants to optimize it. Which change would most improve performance?

⚠ Common exam trap

The trap here is that candidates focus on the second loop's syntax (list comprehension) or data structure (set) instead of recognizing that the first loop's manual counting logic is the real performance bottleneck, which `Counter` optimizes via C-level internals.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Use a counter from collections module

Using `collections.Counter` replaces the manual dictionary increment logic with a single optimized C-level operation, reducing Python bytecode execution overhead. The Counter's `most_common()` method or direct iteration over items still requires a second loop, but the first loop's increment is significantly faster due to internal C implementation, which is the primary bottleneck in large log processing.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Use a list comprehension for the second loop

    Why it's wrong here

    May be slightly faster but still relies on manual counting.

  • Pre-allocate the blocked_ips list

    Why it's wrong here

    Cannot pre-allocate size for unknown number of IPs.

  • Use a set for blocked_ips to avoid duplicates

    Why it's wrong here

    IPs are already unique from dict keys; set does not improve counting performance.

  • Use a counter from collections module

    Why this is correct

    Counter is optimized for frequency counting.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 25, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This PCEP practice question is part of Courseiva's free Python Institute certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PCEP exam.