- A
count = 0 for i in range(len(employees)): if employees[i]['age'] <= 30: count += 1
Why wrong: Condition uses <= 30, counting employees 30 or younger.
- B
count = 0 i = 0 while i < len(employees): if employees[i]['age'] > 30: count += 1
Why wrong: Missing i increment causes infinite loop.
- C
count = 0 for emp in employees: if emp['age'] > 30: count += 1
Correctly increments count for each employee over 30.
- D
count = [emp for emp in employees if emp['age'] > 30]
Why wrong: Returns a list, not the count.
PCEP Control Flow, Loops, Lists and Logic Practice Question
This PCEP practice question tests your understanding of control flow, loops, lists and logic. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A company stores employee data as a list of dictionaries. Each dictionary has keys 'name' and 'age'. Which code correctly counts employees older than 30?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
count = 0 for emp in employees: if emp['age'] > 30: count += 1
Option C is correct because it uses a simple `for` loop to iterate directly over each dictionary in the `employees` list, checks if the value of the `'age'` key is greater than 30, and increments the counter accordingly. This is the most Pythonic and readable approach for counting elements that satisfy a condition.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
count = 0 for i in range(len(employees)): if employees[i]['age'] <= 30: count += 1
Why it's wrong here
Condition uses <= 30, counting employees 30 or younger.
- ✗
count = 0 i = 0 while i < len(employees): if employees[i]['age'] > 30: count += 1
Why it's wrong here
Missing i increment causes infinite loop.
- ✓
count = 0 for emp in employees: if emp['age'] > 30: count += 1
Why this is correct
Correctly increments count for each employee over 30.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
count = [emp for emp in employees if emp['age'] > 30]
Why it's wrong here
Returns a list, not the count.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Python Institute often tests the distinction between creating a filtered list and counting elements, so the trap here is that option D looks correct but produces a list instead of a numeric count, which is a subtle but critical difference.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Under the hood, Python dictionaries are hash tables, so accessing `emp['age']` is O(1) on average. The `for` loop in option C directly iterates over the list's iterator, avoiding the overhead of indexing and the `range()` function. In real-world data processing, using list comprehensions (like option D) with `len()` is often more efficient for counting, but the question specifically asks for code that 'counts' and option C correctly accumulates the integer count.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A practitioner preparing for the PCEP exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Control Flow, Loops, Lists and Logic — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Control Flow, Loops, Lists and Logic practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All PCEP questions
510 questions across all exam domains
- →
Certified Entry-Level Python Programmer PCEP study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
PCEP practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related PCEP practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Computer Programming and Python Fundamentals practice questions
Practise PCEP questions linked to Computer Programming and Python Fundamentals.
Data Types, Variables, Basic I/O and Operators practice questions
Practise PCEP questions linked to Data Types, Variables, Basic I/O and Operators.
Control Flow, Loops, Lists and Logic practice questions
Practise PCEP questions linked to Control Flow, Loops, Lists and Logic.
Functions, Tuples, Dictionaries and Exceptions practice questions
Practise PCEP questions linked to Functions, Tuples, Dictionaries and Exceptions.
PCEP fundamentals practice questions
Practise PCEP questions linked to PCEP fundamentals.
PCEP scenario practice questions
Practise PCEP questions linked to PCEP scenario.
PCEP troubleshooting practice questions
Practise PCEP questions linked to PCEP troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free PCEP practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this PCEP question test?
Control Flow, Loops, Lists and Logic — This question tests Control Flow, Loops, Lists and Logic — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: count = 0 for emp in employees: if emp['age'] > 30: count += 1 — Option C is correct because it uses a simple `for` loop to iterate directly over each dictionary in the `employees` list, checks if the value of the `'age'` key is greater than 30, and increments the counter accordingly. This is the most Pythonic and readable approach for counting elements that satisfy a condition.
What should I do if I get this PCEP question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026
This PCEP practice question is part of Courseiva's free Python Institute certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PCEP exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.