Courseiva

ITIL4F Key Concepts of IT Service Management Practice Question

Exhibit

Refer to the exhibit.
```
SLA: Gold Support
Target: 99.9% Availability
Current: 99.5% Availability
```

The exhibit shows a service level agreement (SLA) target and current performance. Which action should be taken to address this?

⚠ Common exam trap

A common mix-up: candidates assume a small gap is acceptable (Option B) or that renegotiation (Option C) is a quick fix, but ITIL 4 requires evidence-based decisions and prioritizes improving service performance over adjusting targets.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Investigate and implement improvements to increase availability

The correct action is to investigate and implement improvements to increase availability because the current performance (e.g., 97.5%) is below the SLA target (e.g., 99.9%), and the gap is not within any defined tolerance. ITIL 4 emphasizes continuous improvement, so the service provider should analyze root causes (e.g., using incident management data) and apply corrective measures to meet the agreed target.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Penalize the service provider financially

    Why it's wrong here

    While financial penalties, often termed service credits, can be stipulated in a contract for failing to meet Service Level Agreement (SLA) targets, they are a consequence rather than a proactive ITIL-aligned action. The immediate focus should be on understanding the underlying performance issues and implementing constructive improvements to restore service levels. Solely penalizing the provider does not resolve the service deficiency or prevent future occurrences, which is contrary to ITIL's emphasis on continual improvement and value co-creation.

  • ✗

    Ignore the gap as it is within acceptable tolerance

    Why it's wrong here

    Ignoring a gap in service performance, even if numerically small (e.g., 0.4% below target), contradicts the fundamental ITIL principle of 'progress iteratively with feedback' and the Continual Improvement practice. Any deviation from agreed-upon Service Level Agreement (SLA) targets signifies a potential impact on value delivery and warrants investigation. Dismissing such a shortfall as 'acceptable tolerance' risks customer dissatisfaction and allows underlying issues to persist, potentially escalating into more significant problems.

  • ✗

    Renegotiate the SLA to lower the target

    Why it's wrong here

    Renegotiating a Service Level Agreement (SLA) to lower a target should be considered a last resort, typically only after thorough investigation reveals that the current target is genuinely unachievable with reasonable effort or if business requirements have fundamentally shifted. The initial and preferred ITIL approach is to identify the root causes of underperformance and implement improvements to meet the established target. Prematurely lowering the target avoids addressing the core problem and may reduce the value delivered to the customer.

  • ✓

    Investigate and implement improvements to increase availability

    Why this is correct

    When a service level target, such as availability, is not met, the most appropriate and ITIL-aligned action is to proactively investigate the root causes of the shortfall. This involves identifying contributing factors, designing, and implementing specific improvements to enhance the service's performance and reliability. This approach directly aligns with the Continual Improvement practice, aiming to restore and ideally exceed the agreed-upon service levels, thereby ensuring the delivery of expected value to the customer.

About these practice questions

One of 805 original ITIL4F practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This ITIL4F practice question is part of Courseiva's free PeopleCert certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the ITIL4F exam.