Option B is correct because the exhibited configuration includes an application-group 'Web-Apps' that includes both ssl and web-browsing. If this application-group is referenced in a policy rule that is evaluated before the 'Allow-SSL' rule and has a deny action, traffic matching any member of the group would be denied. However, the exhibit does not show such a rule; the analysis is that the 'Block-HTTP' rule might be matching if the application is misidentified, but since it's ssl, that rule should not match.
The error is that the application-group 'Web-Apps' is defined but not used, so it's not causing the issue. Actually, the most likely reason is that there is a rule with application-group that denies the traffic. Since the exhibit shows no such rule, perhaps the correct answer is that the 'service' is incorrectly set to 'application-default' and SSL uses port 443, but that should be fine.
Re-assess: The exhibit shows only two rules; the 'Allow-SSL' rule should allow the traffic. But the user reports denial. Possibly another rule is present in the actual configuration.
But based on the exhibit, the most plausible is that the 'Block-HTTP' rule matches because the application identification is failing. Given the difficulty, I'll go with a different correct answer: The firewall is not correctly identifying the application due to missing decryption. Option D is plausible.
Let me rework.