Courseiva

CCNA Evidence Review And Response Actions Questions

16 of 91 questions · Page 2/2 · Evidence Review And Response Actions · Answers revealed

76
Multi-Selecteasy

Which TWO views or tabs in Cortex XDR provide insight into forensic artifacts collected from endpoints? (Choose two)

Select 2 answers
A.Incident Timeline / Causality view
B.Corporate gym membership roster
C.File Details / Forensic File Collection view
D.Cloud printer ink supply level gauge
E.Cafeteria food inventory management sheet
AnswersA, C

The Incident Timeline and Causality view chain alerts, processes and network events into a chronological attack story, exposing forensic artefacts such as executed binaries and registry changes. This satisfies the requirement to surface endpoint forensic evidence within an investigation.

Why this answer

Option A, the Incident Timeline / Causality view, is correct because in Cortex XDR this view reconstructs the sequence of events (process execution, network connections, file writes, registry changes) around an alert, letting analysts trace the root cause and forensic artifacts collected from the endpoint. Option C, the File Details / Forensic File Collection view, is correct because it exposes the actual collected forensic artifacts such as quarantined files, hashes, and file metadata retrieved from the endpoint during an investigation. The remaining options (B, D, and E) are unrelated administrative or facilities records and have no role in Cortex XDR forensic artifact analysis.

Exam trap

XDR-Analyst often tests whether candidates can distinguish genuine Cortex XDR investigative views from obviously irrelevant distractor options, so reading the full option list carefully is essential.

77
MCQmedium

An analyst is investigating a security incident and needs to review the timeline of events that occurred on a compromised endpoint. The analyst wants to see a chronological list of all alerts, process executions, and network connections related to the incident. Which Cortex XDR view should the analyst use?

A.Incident Details page
B.Endpoint Management console
C.Threat Intelligence module
D.XQL Query Center
AnswerA

The Incident Details page in Cortex XDR provides a consolidated view of all alerts and associated events for a specific incident, including a timeline that shows the sequence of activities. It aggregates data from multiple sources, such as process executions and network connections, allowing the analyst to see a chronological narrative of the attack. This is the primary workspace for incident investigation.

Why this answer

The Incident Details page is specifically designed to present all relevant information for an incident in one place, including a chronological timeline of alerts, process executions, and network connections. This allows the analyst to quickly understand the sequence of events without manual querying. Other options serve different purposes such as endpoint management, threat intelligence, or custom querying.

Exam trap

The trap here is thinking that XQL is needed to build a timeline, but the Incident Details page already provides a pre-built chronological view for the incident.

78
MCQmedium

An analyst is investigating a suspected phishing attack and needs to review the command line arguments passed to a suspicious email attachment execution. Where can the analyst find this evidence in Cortex XDR?

A.Hardware asset inventory list
B.Agent network proxy configuration file
C.DNS server cache table
D.Process Execution details within the Causality Chain
AnswerD

Process Execution events in the Causality Chain record the full command line and arguments for each process, including the attachment's execution. The analyst can trace the parent email or browser process to the spawned command and read its arguments there.

Why this answer

Cortex XDR captures process execution telemetry as part of its endpoint data collection, and the Causality Chain view links each process to its parent, showing the full command line arguments used when the process was launched. When a suspicious email attachment executes, the spawned process (e.g., WINWORD.EXE launching a script or executable) appears in the Causality Chain with its exact command line, allowing the analyst to see what arguments were passed. This is the authoritative location for process-level execution evidence in Cortex XDR.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing general asset or network telemetry (inventory, proxy config, DNS cache) with endpoint process execution evidence, which is only available in the Causality Chain.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because the hardware asset inventory list contains device metadata (serial numbers, models, owners) and has no process execution or command-line data. Option B is wrong because the agent network proxy configuration file governs how the agent communicates with the Cortex XDR management server and does not record endpoint process activity. Option C is wrong because the DNS server cache table only holds resolved domain-to-IP mappings and cannot reveal command-line arguments passed to a local process.

79
Multi-Selectmedium

Which TWO actions should an analyst take when conducting evidence review for a suspected credential dumping incident? (Choose two)

Select 2 answers
A.Verify employee cafeteria badge swipe access times
B.Check the office HVAC temperature logs
C.Analyze cafeteria point-of-sale receipt records
D.Review command-line arguments for utility tools utilized during the attack
E.Inspect process access events targeting LSASS.exe
AnswersD, E

Reviewing command-line arguments exposes the specific flags used by credential-dumping utilities such as Mimikatz or ProcDump, revealing whether LSASS memory was targeted and which credential stores were accessed. This satisfies the stem's evidence-review constraint by capturing process-level artefacts that reconstruct attacker technique and scope during the incident.

Why this answer

Option D is correct because reviewing command-line arguments for utility tools (e.g., procdump, comsvcs.dll MiniDump, or Mimikatz invocations) reveals the exact syntax and target used to dump credentials, which is critical evidence in a credential dumping investigation. Option E is correct because LSASS.exe holds credential material in memory, so inspecting process access events (e.g., Sysmon Event ID 10, ProcessAccess with GrantedAccess like 0x1010 or 0x1410) targeting LSASS.exe directly identifies the credential dumping attempt. Options A and B are incorrect because badge swipe times and HVAC temperature logs are physical/environmental records unrelated to memory-based credential theft.

Option C is incorrect because point-of-sale receipt records pertain to retail transactions and have no bearing on credential dumping activity on endpoints.

Exam trap

XDR-Analyst often tests whether candidates can distinguish between relevant endpoint telemetry (process access, command-line arguments) and irrelevant physical or business logs (badge swipes, HVAC, POS records) when investigating credential dumping.

80
MCQeasy

When reviewing incident details in Cortex XDR, an analyst sees the 'MITRE ATT&CK' tab. What value does this tab provide during evidence review?

A.It provides network routing tables for the compromised subnet.
B.It maps the behaviors observed in the incident to known attacker tactics and techniques.
C.It automatically downloads security patches from vendor repositories.
D.It lists the hardware warranty status of the affected device.
AnswerB

The MITRE ATT&CK tab translates observed behaviours into named tactics and techniques, giving analysts a shared vocabulary for what the attacker did. This mapping satisfies evidence review by contextualising raw alerts within a known framework, aiding scoping, reporting, and identification of coverage gaps.

Why this answer

The MITRE ATT&CK tab in Cortex XDR incident details maps observed behaviors to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, which is a curated knowledge base of adversary tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs). This mapping helps analysts understand the attacker's intent, identify the stage of the attack lifecycle, and prioritize response actions. It provides context beyond raw alerts by categorizing activities like 'Credential Dumping' (T1003) or 'Spearphishing Attachment' (T1566), enabling faster triage and correlation with threat intelligence.

Exam trap

XDR-Analyst often tests whether candidates confuse the MITRE ATT&CK tab with other incident tabs like 'Network' or 'Asset Details', leading them to select options about routing tables or warranty status.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because network routing tables are not part of the MITRE ATT&CK tab; they are found in network device configurations or routing protocols, not in incident evidence. Option C is wrong because automatic patch downloads are a vulnerability management function, not a mapping to attacker techniques; Cortex XDR does not download patches from this tab. Option D is wrong because hardware warranty status is an asset management detail, unrelated to the behavioral mapping provided by MITRE ATT&CK.

81
MCQeasy

An analyst is investigating an endpoint alert in Cortex XDR and needs to review the process hierarchy that led to the execution of a suspicious PowerShell command. Which Cortex XDR view should the analyst examine?

A.Action Center
B.Audit Log
C.BIOC Rules Manager
D.Causality Chain
AnswerD

The Causality Chain reconstructs the parent-child process lineage, showing every process that spawned the suspicious PowerShell execution. This directly satisfies the requirement to review the process hierarchy, unlike the Alert, Incident, or Timeline views, which present detections and events without the ancestral execution path.

Why this answer

The Causality Chain view in Cortex XDR visualizes the process tree and root-cause relationships that led to an alert, showing parent-child process lineage. To trace how a suspicious PowerShell command was spawned, the analyst examines the Causality Chain to see the originating process, its parent, and the full execution path. This is the core forensic view for process-level investigation.

Exam trap

The trap is confusing the Causality Chain (process lineage/root cause) with the Action Center (response actions) or Audit Log (admin activity) — only the Causality Chain shows the process hierarchy.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because the Action Center lists response actions taken (e.g., isolate, quarantine) and their status, not process lineage. Option B is wrong because the Audit Log records administrative and user actions for compliance, not endpoint process trees. Option C is wrong because the BIOC Rules Manager is where detection rules are created and managed, not where process causality is visualized.

82
MCQmedium

An analyst wants to terminate a malicious process and all of its spawned child processes across a targeted endpoint directly from the Cortex XDR incident view. Which response action accomplishes this?

A.Retrieve File
B.Block File Hash
C.Kill Process Tree
D.Isolate Endpoint
AnswerC

Kill Process Tree terminates the specified process together with every descendant it spawned, satisfying the requirement to eliminate the entire malicious process hierarchy on the endpoint. A single-process kill would leave children running and able to persist, whereas this action removes the full tree directly from the Cortex XDR incident view.

Why this answer

Kill Process Tree terminates the specified process and all of its child processes on the targeted endpoint, which is exactly what's needed to stop a malicious parent and its spawned children in one action. It's available directly from the Cortex XDR incident/endpoint view.

Exam trap

The trap is confusing containment actions (Isolate Endpoint) or preventive actions (Block File Hash) with active termination — only Kill Process Tree stops the running process and its children.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Retrieve File pulls a file copy for analysis; it does not terminate processes. Option B is wrong because Block File Hash prevents future execution of that hash but does not stop currently running processes. Option D is wrong because Isolate Endpoint cuts network communication but leaves the malicious process running locally.

83
MCQhard

An organization uses Cortex XDR and wants to ensure that a known internal penetration testing tool is never blocked or alerted upon by Cortex XDR protection modules. Where should the exclusion be defined to affect all agents globally?

A.Syslog forwarding rules
B.Cortex XDR Management Console under Exceptions
C.User Identity mapping rules
D.Local Windows Registry on each endpoint
AnswerB

Console-level Exceptions under the Cortex XDR Management Console apply to all registered agents, ensuring the penetration testing tool is neither blocked nor alerted on globally. Endpoint-local exclusions would only affect individual hosts, failing the global scope requirement.

Why this answer

Cortex XDR Exceptions defined in the management console are pushed as policy to all agents, allowing a known tool (e.g., an internal pen-test binary) to be excluded from prevention and/or alerting globally. This is the centralized, supported mechanism for organization-wide exclusions.

Exam trap

The trap is assuming local or indirect mechanisms (registry edits, syslog, identity mapping) can enforce global exclusions — only the centralized Exceptions policy in the Cortex XDR console affects all agents.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Syslog forwarding rules only export logs to external SIEMs and have no effect on agent prevention or alerting. Option C is wrong because User Identity mapping rules correlate users to endpoints for attribution, not for allow-listing files. Option D is wrong because editing the local Windows Registry on each endpoint is unmanaged, non-scalable, and not how Cortex XDR enforces exclusions — it would also be overwritten or ignored by the agent policy.

84
Multi-Selecthard

During an investigation of a suspected data exfiltration incident, an analyst observes that a finance workstation initiated an outbound SMB connection to an unfamiliar internal host on port 445 at 02:14. The analyst wants to determine whether lateral movement occurred before sensitive files were staged. Which TWO Cortex XDR evidence sources should the analyst review to correlate the SMB session with the originating process and the remote endpoint's activity? (Choose two.)

Select 2 answers
A.Endpoint process execution history on the destination internal host
B.DNS query history for the destination internal host
C.Firewall rule audit log for the perimeter firewall
D.Network connections table filtered by the source endpoint and destination port 445
E.Email gateway message tracking log for the finance user
AnswersA, D

Process execution history on the destination host shows what executed after the SMB session arrived, such as remote service creation or file access. Correlating this with the SMB connection timeline confirms whether the connection was used for lateral movement and what actions followed on the target, which is required to validate the intrusion path.

Why this answer

Confirming lateral movement requires linking the SMB session to the process that created it and to activity on the destination host. The network connections table provides the originating process and remote endpoint for the port 445 session, while process execution history on the destination shows what ran after the connection. Together they establish the movement path and the actions taken, which are the evidence needed to validate the intrusion.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that any single log source, such as DNS or firewall configuration, can prove lateral movement without correlating the initiating process and the destination host activity.

85
MCQeasy

After containing a malware outbreak, a Cortex XDR analyst needs to verify that the malicious file was removed from all affected endpoints. The analyst wants to confirm the current state of the endpoints without waiting for the next scheduled scan. Which Cortex XDR action allows the analyst to query endpoint file system state on demand and return results to the console?

A.Modify the endpoint protection policy to enable real-time file monitoring and rely on future alerts to confirm removal.
B.Initiate a WildFire submission of the file hash to obtain a fresh verdict and infer that the file was removed.
C.Review the Incident Details page timeline for the original detection and confirm that the file was quarantined at that time.
D.Run a script or command through the Cortex XDR Live Terminal or action center to check for the file's presence and capture the output.
AnswerD

Cortex XDR Live Terminal and script-based response actions let the analyst execute a query on demand across selected endpoints and return output to the console. This provides immediate, auditable confirmation of whether the malicious file remains, without waiting for a scheduled scan, and supports rapid follow-up remediation if the artifact is still present.

Why this answer

To verify current endpoint state on demand, Cortex XDR provides Live Terminal and script-based response actions that execute directly on endpoints and return output to the console. These actions query the live file system, so the analyst can confirm whether the malicious file persists and immediately remediate if it does, rather than waiting for scheduled scans or relying on historical detection records.

Exam trap

The trap here is treating a historical quarantine event or a WildFire verdict as proof that the file is currently absent, when only an on-demand endpoint query confirms present state.

86
Multi-Selecthard

An analyst is reviewing a Cortex XDR incident involving a suspicious PowerShell script that was executed on multiple endpoints. The analyst needs to gather evidence to determine the script's origin and impact. Which TWO actions should the analyst take to collect relevant evidence from the endpoints? (Choose two.)

Select 2 answers
A.Initiate a full antivirus scan on the endpoints.
B.Isolate the endpoints from the network immediately.
C.Retrieve the PowerShell script file from the endpoints using the 'Retrieve File' action.
D.Review the endpoints' Windows Event Logs for PowerShell operational events.
E.Run an XQL query to retrieve process execution events for PowerShell on the affected endpoints.
AnswersC, E

The 'Retrieve File' action allows the analyst to download a copy of the PowerShell script from the endpoints for offline analysis. This is crucial for examining the script's contents, obfuscation techniques, and potential payloads. It provides direct evidence of what was executed, which helps determine the script's origin and impact. This action is a standard part of evidence collection in Cortex XDR.

Why this answer

Retrieving the PowerShell script file provides direct evidence of its contents, while querying process execution events via XQL gives context about how and where it ran. Together, these actions allow the analyst to understand the script's origin, execution parameters, and impact across endpoints. The other options are either containment or detection measures that do not directly collect the needed evidence.

Exam trap

The trap here is choosing isolation as an evidence-gathering step; isolation is containment, not collection, and can impede remote evidence retrieval.

87
Multi-Selectmedium

When reviewing identity alerts in Cortex XDR, which TWO anomalous behaviors might indicate compromised credentials? (Choose two)

Select 2 answers
A.Accessing sensitive resources outside normal working hours and baseline behavior
B.Connecting a standard corporate wired Ethernet cable
C.Impossible travel logins from geographically distant locations within minutes
D.Printing a standard business document to the local office printer
E.Routine login from the user's assigned office desktop during regular business hours
AnswersA, C

Accessing sensitive resources outside normal working hours and baseline behaviour directly satisfies the compromised-credentials indicator: valid accounts used by an unauthorised party. Cortex XDR baselines each identity's typical access patterns, so deviations in timing or resource scope surface as identity analytics alerts, distinguishing credential misuse from malware-driven activity.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because accessing sensitive resources outside normal working hours and outside the user's established baseline behavior is a classic indicator of compromised credentials — an attacker using stolen credentials often operates at unusual times and targets data the legitimate user does not normally touch, which Cortex XDR surfaces as an identity analytics anomaly. Option C is correct because impossible travel logins from geographically distant locations within minutes are physically impossible for a single human to perform, indicating the credentials are being used by multiple parties or an attacker from a remote location, a well-known credential-compromise signal in Cortex XDR identity alerts. Option B does not belong because connecting a standard corporate wired Ethernet cable is a normal, expected network activity with no identity or credential anomaly.

Option D does not belong because printing a standard business document to the local office printer is routine user behavior unrelated to credential misuse. Option E does not belong because a routine login from the user's assigned office desktop during regular business hours matches the expected baseline and shows no anomaly.

Exam trap

The trap is selecting normal activities as anomalous; candidates must distinguish between routine behavior and genuine deviations from baseline.

88
Multi-Selecteasy

An analyst is reviewing the Causality Chain for an alert. Which TWO key insights does this view provide? (Choose two)

Select 2 answers
A.The physical location of the server room containing the host
B.The corporate email distribution list membership
C.The chronological sequence of events associated with the detection
D.The power consumption wattage of the CPU
E.The parent-child process relationship leading to the alert
AnswersC, E

The Causality Chain renders the ordered timeline of activity surrounding a detection, showing which events preceded and followed it. This chronological sequencing satisfies the requirement to understand how the alert unfolded, supporting root-cause analysis rather than merely listing static indicators.

Why this answer

Option C is correct because the Causality Chain view presents the chronological sequence of events associated with the detection, allowing the analyst to see how activity unfolded over time leading up to the alert. Option E is correct because the Causality Chain specifically maps the parent-child process relationships that led to the alert, showing which process spawned which and how the detection was ultimately triggered. Options A, B, and D are incorrect because physical server room location, email distribution list membership, and CPU power consumption wattage are unrelated to the process lineage and event timeline that the Causality Chain provides.

89
MCQhard

An analyst is reviewing a Cortex XDR incident involving a compromised Linux server. The analyst needs to retrieve the contents of a suspicious file located at /tmp/malware.bin from the endpoint for further analysis. Which response action should the analyst use?

A.Quarantine File
B.Isolate Endpoint
C.Retrieve File
D.Run Script
AnswerC

Retrieve File is a Cortex XDR response action that allows analysts to collect a specific file from an endpoint and store it in the Cortex XDR console for offline analysis. It supports Linux, Windows, and macOS endpoints. By specifying the file path, the analyst can obtain the suspicious binary without disrupting the endpoint's operation, enabling deeper forensic examination.

Why this answer

Retrieve File is the correct response action because it directly collects a specified file from an endpoint and makes it available in the Cortex XDR console for analysis. This allows the analyst to examine the suspicious binary without altering the endpoint's state or requiring custom scripting. Other actions like quarantine or isolation do not provide the file contents, and Run Script is an indirect and less reliable method.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that quarantine or isolation automatically provides file contents for analysis, when actually a separate retrieval action is needed.

90
MCQhard

An analyst identifies that a legitimate software updater is triggering behavioral alerts due to spawning child processes typical of Living-off-the-Land binaries. To prevent alerts for this specific signed binary when executed from its legitimate path, what exception configuration is recommended?

A.Configuring a network port forwarding rule
B.Deleting the software updater from all endpoints
C.Signed binary exception with path and certificate verification
D.Disabling all behavioral monitoring on the subnet
AnswerC

Behavioural alerts fire on process lineage, not file reputation, so a signed-binary exception alone is insufficient. Binding the exception to both the updater's installation path and its valid certificate ensures only that genuine signed binary is exempted, preventing masquerading malware from abusing the exclusion.

Why this answer

Signed binary exceptions combined with valid certificate verification and file path checks allow legitimate administrative or updater tools to operate without generating alerts.

91
MCQhard

An analyst identifies a custom, benign internal tool that is continuously flagged by a BIOC rule in Cortex XDR. To prevent future alerts without disabling the entire rule globally, what is the best practice method to create an exception?

A.Modify the Agent Settings profile to stop reporting all file execution events.
B.Disable the BIOC rule globally in the Profiles page.
C.Create a local exception using the specific file hash or path within the Exceptions management page.
D.Delete the alert from the Incident View to prevent re-triggering.
AnswerC

A local exception scoped to the specific file hash or path suppresses alerts for that known-benign internal tool while leaving the BIOC rule active for all other endpoints. This satisfies the stem's constraint of preventing future alerts without globally disabling detection coverage.

Why this answer

Creating an exception using file hash or digital signature parameters directly from the alert context ensures targeted suppression without weakening the broader BIOC rule effectiveness.

← PreviousPage 2 of 2 · 91 questions total

Ready to test yourself?

Try a timed practice session using only Evidence Review And Response Actions questions.