Courseiva

CCNA Troubleshooting Questions

23 of 98 questions · Page 2/2 · Troubleshooting topic · Answers revealed

76
MCQhard

An administrator is troubleshooting a Prisma Access deployment where mobile users authenticated through SAML intermittently lose access to internal resources after about an hour, though the GlobalProtect tunnel never drops. Reviewing logs shows the users still have valid tunnel sessions and assigned IP addresses. Which underlying condition is most likely causing the intermittent access loss?

A.The Service Connection IPsec tunnel is rekeying every hour and briefly dropping internal routes.
B.The GlobalProtect gateway is load-balancing users across multiple gateways and reassigning addresses mid-session.
C.The SAML identity provider group mapping or session timeout is expiring, causing user-to-group mappings to be lost.
D.The decryption policy is re-evaluating certificates hourly and blocking re-established sessions.
AnswerC

When SAML group mappings expire or the identity provider session times out, Prisma Access can no longer resolve the user's groups, so policies that reference those groups stop matching even though the tunnel remains up. This produces hourly access failures with an intact session and stable address. Refreshing group mapping or extending the session lifetime restores policy matching.

Why this answer

Access that fails roughly hourly while the tunnel and address stay valid points to identity rather than network state. SAML group mappings and identity provider sessions have finite lifetimes; when they expire, group-based policy no longer matches and internal access is denied. Refreshing group mapping or extending session lifetime restores the missing identity context.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming any access loss means the tunnel dropped, when an intact tunnel with stable addressing points to expiring identity and group-mapping context instead.

77
Multi-Selectmedium

An administrator is troubleshooting a Prisma Access Remote Networks deployment where branch office users cannot reach external websites. Which TWO configuration areas or logs should the administrator check to resolve this issue? (Choose two)

Select 2 answers
A.Prisma Access Insight mobile user license allocation
B.Panorama > Policy > Security rules allowing trust-to-untrust traffic
C.GlobalProtect Portal client certificate store
D.Remote Networks routing configuration and static/BGP routes
E.WildFire analysis report queue
AnswersB, D

Security rules in Panorama govern inter-zone traffic, so a missing trust-to-untrust rule silently drops branch egress before any NAT or routing applies. Since Remote Networks traffic traverses the trust zone toward untrust, verifying this policy directly satisfies the stem's requirement to identify why external website access fails.

Why this answer

Option B is correct because in a Prisma Access Remote Networks deployment, security policy is managed centrally through Panorama, and a missing or misconfigured trust-to-untrust security rule will silently drop branch user traffic destined for the internet, so verifying the rulebase is essential. Option D is correct because Remote Networks connectivity depends on the routing configuration pushed from Panorama, including static routes or BGP peering with the Prisma Access service connection; if routes are missing or the BGP session is down, branch traffic never reaches the internet. Option A is incorrect because Insight mobile user license allocation applies to Mobile Users (GlobalProtect) licensing, not Remote Networks branch traffic.

Option C is incorrect because the GlobalProtect Portal client certificate store is relevant to Mobile Users authentication, not to Remote Networks site-to-site tunnels. Option E is incorrect because the WildFire analysis report queue concerns threat analysis results and has no bearing on basic internet reachability for branch users.

Exam trap

SSE-Engineer often tests the tendency to focus on licensing or certificates for connectivity issues, when the actual problem is usually in security policy or routing for Remote Networks.

78
MCQhard

An administrator configures a Service Connection in Prisma Access to reach an on-premises Active Directory domain controller for authentication. Users are able to log in, but User-ID is failing to map IP addresses to usernames for users behind the Remote Network. What is the most likely reason for this User-ID failure?

A.User-ID agent or Panorama redistribution is not configured to poll the internal Domain Controller across the Service Connection, or security rules block User-ID traffic.
B.The GlobalProtect client certificate has expired.
C.BGP routing is disabled on the GlobalProtect gateway.
D.WildFire subscription is expired.
AnswerA

Authentication succeeds because the Service Connection reaches the domain controller, but User-ID mapping requires the agent or Panorama to actively query that same controller for session data. Without polling across the Service Connection, or with User-ID traffic blocked, IP-to-username mapping never occurs for Remote Network users.

Why this answer

User-ID mapping requires the firewall (or a User-ID agent/Panorama) to actively query domain controllers via WMI/ WinRM or read security event logs to correlate IP addresses with usernames. When users authenticate through a Service Connection to an on-premises DC but User-ID mapping fails, the most common cause is that no User-ID agent or Panorama-based redistribution is configured to poll that internal DC across the Service Connection, or security policy is blocking the User-ID traffic (WMI/RPC/NetBIOS) between Prisma Access and the DC.

Exam trap

SSE-Engineer often tests the confusion between authentication (proving who a user is at login) and User-ID mapping (continuously correlating IPs to usernames), leading candidates to blame certificates or subscriptions instead of the User-ID agent configuration.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because an expired GlobalProtect client certificate would prevent users from connecting at all, not just break User-ID mapping — and the scenario states users can log in successfully. Option C is wrong because BGP routing on the GlobalProtect gateway affects route advertisement and reachability, not the User-ID agent's ability to query a DC; disabling BGP would cause broader connectivity failures. Option D is wrong because WildFire is a threat-prevention subscription for file analysis and has no relationship to User-ID IP-to-username mapping.

79
MCQhard

Users in a specific region are experiencing intermittent latency and packet loss when accessing SaaS applications through Prisma Access. The administrator wants to analyze the quality of the path between the remote network location and the Prisma Access cloud node. Which Prisma Access feature should be utilized?

A.Panorama ACC Threat Map
B.Traffic log bandwidth utilization graphs
C.Prisma Access Insight path quality monitoring
D.GlobalProtect internal adapter diagnostics
AnswerC

Insight path quality monitoring measures latency, jitter and packet loss across the path between remote network locations and Prisma Access nodes, giving hop-level visibility. This directly satisfies the administrator's requirement to analyse path quality for the affected region's SaaS traffic.

Why this answer

Prisma Access Insight path quality monitoring provides detailed metrics on the quality of the path between remote network locations and Prisma Access cloud nodes, including latency, packet loss, and jitter. This is the correct feature to analyze the quality of the path for troubleshooting intermittent latency and packet loss.

Exam trap

SSE-Engineer often tests the confusion between bandwidth utilization and path quality, leading candidates to choose traffic logs instead of the dedicated path quality monitoring feature.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Panorama ACC Threat Map displays threat information, not path quality. Option B is wrong because traffic log bandwidth utilization graphs show bandwidth usage, not path quality metrics like latency and packet loss. Option D is wrong because GlobalProtect internal adapter diagnostics are for client-side troubleshooting, not path quality between remote network and Prisma Access.

80
MCQmedium

A network engineer is troubleshooting an IPsec site-to-site tunnel failure between a customer CPE and a Prisma Access Remote Network. The IKE phase 1 negotiations fail. Which log should the engineer examine to determine the exact reason for the IKE negotiation failure?

A.Monitor > Logs > Threat.
B.Panorama > Cloud Services > Audit Log.
C.Monitor > Logs > System (filtering for IKE or IPsec events) or viewing tunnel status.
D.Monitor > Logs > URL Filtering.
AnswerC

IKE phase 1 failures are logged as system-level events, so Monitor > Logs > System filtered for IKE or IPsec captures the precise negotiation error, such as proposal mismatch or authentication failure. Tunnel status alone shows only up/down state, not the cause.

Why this answer

System logs and IKE/IPsec operational debugging logs record Phase 1 and Phase 2 negotiation mismatches.

81
MCQeasy

When troubleshooting a Prisma Access issue, an engineer needs to generate a Tech Support File (TSF) specifically for the Prisma Access cloud infrastructure. Where is this option located in Panorama?

A.Device > Support > Tech Support File.
B.Panorama > Cloud Services > Setup > Support.
C.Monitor > Logs > System.
D.Policies > Security.
AnswerB

Panorama > Cloud Services > Setup > Support exposes the Prisma Access cloud infrastructure Tech Support File generation, distinct from the managed firewall TSF. The stem specifies the cloud infrastructure scope, so this is the correct location rather than device-level support options.

Why this answer

TSFs for Prisma Access can be generated under Panorama > Cloud Services > Setup > Support.

82
MCQhard

A Prisma Access administrator is troubleshooting an issue where mobile users intermittently lose access to all applications for a few seconds. The administrator suspects an issue with the GlobalProtect tunnel. Which tool should the administrator use to view the tunnel status and identify flapping?

A.The Prisma Access system logs, filtering for GlobalProtect gateway events.
B.The Prisma Access dashboard's GlobalProtect status page, checking the number of connected users.
C.The traffic logs, filtering for denied sessions from the mobile user's IP address.
D.The GlobalProtect app logs on the user's endpoint, looking for tunnel disconnect and reconnect events.
AnswerD

The GlobalProtect app logs record tunnel state changes, including disconnects and reconnects. If the tunnel is flapping, these logs will show repeated disconnect and reconnect events with timestamps. This directly identifies tunnel instability, which matches the symptom of intermittent loss of access.

Why this answer

Intermittent loss of all applications for a few seconds suggests the GlobalProtect tunnel is flapping. The GlobalProtect app logs on the endpoint record tunnel state changes, including disconnects and reconnects. These logs provide the necessary detail to confirm flapping and identify patterns, such as timeouts or network changes.

Other tools lack the per-user tunnel state history.

Exam trap

The trap here is using aggregate or policy logs to diagnose a tunnel stability problem, when only endpoint-level GlobalProtect logs capture the disconnect/reconnect cycle.

83
MCQhard

An organization notices that mobile users connecting to Prisma Access from a specific country are experiencing high latency and frequent disconnections. The administrator wants to check the regional Prisma Access node performance and status. Which feature in Panorama provides regional status and cloud infrastructure metrics?

A.Panorama > Cloud Services > Status > Locations / Remote Networks / Mobile Users.
B.Policies > QoS > Bandwidth Management.
C.Device > High Availability.
D.Monitor > Traffic > GlobalProtect Analytics.
AnswerA

Panorama's Cloud Services status pages report per-region Prisma Access node health, capacity and infrastructure metrics for remote networks and mobile users, letting the administrator confirm whether the latency and disconnections originate from a degraded regional node.

Why this answer

Panorama > Cloud Services > Status > Locations / Remote Networks / Mobile Users provides regional status and cloud infrastructure metrics for Prisma Access. This feature shows the health, performance, and status of Prisma Access nodes across different regions, allowing administrators to identify latency or disconnection issues tied to a specific location. It is the centralized monitoring point for regional infrastructure health.

Exam trap

The trap is confusing traffic analytics (GlobalProtect Analytics) or QoS policies with infrastructure status monitoring; candidates must select the Cloud Services Status page for regional node health and cloud metrics.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because Policies > QoS > Bandwidth Management configures quality-of-service policies for traffic prioritization, not regional node performance or status monitoring. Option C is wrong because Device > High Availability shows HA state between firewalls, which is unrelated to Prisma Access regional node health. Option D is wrong because Monitor > Traffic > GlobalProtect Analytics provides analytics on GlobalProtect user traffic and connection logs, but not the regional infrastructure status and cloud metrics needed to diagnose node performance.

84
MCQhard

An administrator is troubleshooting a Prisma Access Remote Networks deployment where branch users experience slow throughput to SaaS applications. The IPsec tunnel to Prisma Access is up, but performance is degraded. The administrator suspects that traffic is not being forwarded to the optimal Service Connection. Which action should the administrator take to verify that Prisma Access is selecting the correct egress point for the branch?

A.Check the GlobalProtect gateway selection logs on the portal
B.Examine the traffic logs for the session and check the egress interface field
C.Review the IPsec tunnel statistics on the branch firewall
D.Run a traceroute from the branch firewall to the SaaS application
AnswerB

Traffic logs in Prisma Access include the egress interface, which identifies the Service Connection used for the session. For a Remote Network, the log will show whether traffic egressed via the expected Service Connection or a suboptimal one. This directly verifies the egress point selection.

Why this answer

Traffic logs are the primary tool for verifying egress selection in Prisma Access. The egress interface field in the traffic log indicates the Service Connection used for a given session. For Remote Networks, administrators can filter logs by source IP and destination to see whether traffic egresses through the intended Service Connection, confirming optimal routing.

Exam trap

The trap here is relying on branch-side tunnel statistics or traceroute, which only show the path to the Prisma Access ingress, not the internal egress selection that determines SaaS performance.

85
MCQmedium

A Prisma Access administrator is troubleshooting a remote network where users cannot reach a SaaS application that is accessed via a Service Connection. The administrator confirms that the IPsec tunnel is up and that the Service Connection is healthy. Which configuration element should the administrator verify next to ensure that traffic from the remote network is routed to the Service Connection?

A.The GlobalProtect portal's agent configuration
B.The remote network's static routes
C.The mobile user's HIP profile
D.The Service Connection's BGP configuration
AnswerB

Static routes on the remote network define how traffic is forwarded from the branch to Prisma Access. If a static route for the SaaS application's subnet is missing or incorrect, traffic will not be sent to the Service Connection. The administrator should verify that the remote network's configuration includes a route pointing to the Service Connection for the SaaS application's IP addresses. This step is crucial for ensuring proper traffic flow.

Why this answer

The remote network's static routes are the correct element to verify because they determine how traffic from the branch is forwarded to Prisma Access and then to the Service Connection. If the static route for the SaaS application's subnet is missing or points to the wrong next hop, traffic will not reach the Service Connection. Ensuring that the remote network has a route to the Service Connection for the SaaS application's IP range is essential for connectivity.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that the Service Connection's BGP configuration is the issue, but since the Service Connection is healthy, the problem is more likely on the remote network's routing configuration.

86
MCQeasy

A network engineer is configuring Prisma Access and needs to verify the status of deployed Mobile User nodes across different regions. Which Panorama workspace is dedicated to displaying the overall health and status of Prisma Access infrastructure?

A.Panorama > Cloud Services > Status.
B.Objects > Certificates.
C.Policies > QoS.
D.Monitor > Managed Devices.
AnswerA

Panorama > Cloud Services > Status is the dedicated workspace aggregating Prisma Access infrastructure health, showing deployed Mobile User nodes and their operational state per region. Other Panorama areas cover policy or logs, not infrastructure status.

Why this answer

Panorama > Cloud Services > Status is the dedicated workspace that displays the overall health and status of Prisma Access infrastructure, including Mobile User and Remote Network nodes across regions. It shows service status, license usage, and node health. The other options are unrelated configuration or monitoring areas.

Exam trap

SSE-Engineer often tests the specific Panorama menu path for Prisma Access health; candidates who confuse it with Monitor > Managed Devices (for on-prem firewalls) or Audit Logs pick the wrong answer.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because Objects > Certificates is where certificates are managed for authentication and decryption, not where Prisma Access infrastructure health is displayed. Option C is wrong because Policies > QoS is where Quality of Service policies are defined, not a health dashboard. Option D is wrong because Monitor > Managed Devices shows managed firewall device status for on-premises or VM-Series firewalls, not the Prisma Access cloud infrastructure health.

87
MCQhard

An organization uses SAML authentication with Prisma Access for mobile users. Users report an intermittent 'Authentication Failed' error when trying to establish a GlobalProtect connection. The Identity Provider (IdP) logs show successful authentication, but Prisma Access logs indicate a failure. What is the most likely cause of this discrepancy?

A.The GlobalProtect client software license has expired on Panorama.
B.Clock skew between the SAML Identity Provider and the Prisma Access service nodes exceeding the allowed tolerance window.
C.The User-ID agent service on the Panorama management server is stopped.
D.WildFire cloud subscription has lapsed.
AnswerB

SAML assertions carry NotBefore and NotOnOrAfter conditions. If the IdP and Prisma Access service nodes disagree on time beyond the tolerance window, Prisma Access rejects an assertion the IdP considered valid, producing exactly this split-log discrepancy.

Why this answer

Intermittent SAML authentication failures where the IdP logs success but Prisma Access logs failure are most commonly caused by clock skew between the IdP and Prisma Access service nodes exceeding the allowed tolerance (typically 5 minutes). SAML assertions include timestamps (NotBefore, NotOnOrAfter) that are validated; if the clocks are not synchronized, the assertion may be considered expired or not yet valid.

Exam trap

SSE-Engineer often tests SAML troubleshooting, and candidates may incorrectly blame licensing or User-ID services instead of recognizing clock skew as the cause of intermittent authentication failures.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because a GlobalProtect client license expiry on Panorama would affect all users consistently, not intermittently, and would not cause SAML assertion validation failures. Option C is wrong because the User-ID agent on Panorama is not involved in SAML authentication for GlobalProtect; it is used for mapping IP addresses to users. Option D is wrong because WildFire subscription lapse affects file analysis, not SAML authentication.

88
MCQmedium

An administrator configures a new Service Connection in Prisma Access to allow mobile users to access resources in the corporate data center. However, traffic from mobile users cannot reach the data center. The administrator confirms that the IPsec tunnel is up. What is the most likely cause of this issue in Panorama?

A.Panorama requires a reboot to activate Service Connections.
B.The internal subnet routes associated with the Service Connection have not been added to the Mobile Users Explicit Proxy or Split Tunnel configuration.
C.The GlobalProtect client version is outdated on all endpoints.
D.The WildFire public cloud subscription has expired.
AnswerB

Mobile users reach the data centre only when the Service Connection's internal subnet routes are advertised into the Mobile Users configuration. Without those routes in the Explicit Proxy or Split Tunnel settings, client traffic is never directed down the IPsec tunnel, so the tunnel being up is irrelevant.

Why this answer

For mobile users to reach data center resources via a Service Connection, the internal subnet routes must be included in the Mobile Users configuration—either in the split tunnel or explicit proxy settings—so that traffic is directed through the Service Connection. Without these routes, mobile user traffic will not be forwarded to the data center even if the IPsec tunnel is up.

Exam trap

SSE-Engineer often tests the assumption that an up IPsec tunnel guarantees end-to-end connectivity, ignoring the need to explicitly include internal subnets in mobile user routing configurations.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Panorama does not require a reboot to activate Service Connections; configuration commits are sufficient. Option C is wrong because an outdated GlobalProtect client version might affect connectivity but is not the most likely cause when the tunnel is up and specific internal subnets are unreachable. Option D is wrong because WildFire subscription expiration affects threat detection, not routing to the data center.

89
MCQmedium

An administrator troubleshooting a Prisma Access environment notices that specific traffic is bypassing security inspection. Upon checking the Security Policy, the administrator sees that a security rule has the profile setting set to 'None'. What does this configuration mean for traffic matching that rule?

A.Traffic matching the rule is dropped automatically.
B.SSL decryption is automatically enabled.
C.Traffic is forced through the explicit proxy.
D.Traffic allowed by the rule will not be inspected by Antivirus, Anti-Spyware, Vulnerability Protection, or WildFire security profiles.
AnswerD

Setting the profile to 'None' means the rule permits matching traffic but attaches no security profiles, so Antivirus, Anti-Spyware, Vulnerability Protection and WildFire inspection are all skipped. The traffic is allowed uninspected, explaining the observed bypass.

Why this answer

When a security rule in Prisma Access has its security profile setting configured as 'None', the rule still permits the traffic based on its match criteria, but no security profiles (Antivirus, Anti-Spyware, Vulnerability Protection, WildFire, URL Filtering, etc.) are applied to that traffic. This effectively creates an allow rule with zero content inspection, which is why the administrator observed traffic bypassing security inspection. The action of the rule is still 'Allow' — 'None' only refers to the profile group attached, not the rule action.

Exam trap

SSE-Engineer often tests the misconception that 'None' in the security profile field means the rule denies or drops traffic, when in fact it only disables content inspection while the rule still allows the traffic.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because setting the profile to 'None' does not change the rule action to Deny — the rule still allows matching traffic; dropping would require the action to be set to Deny or Drop. Option B is wrong because SSL decryption is controlled by a separate Decryption policy and SSL Forward Proxy settings, not by the security profile field on a security rule. Option C is wrong because explicit proxy enforcement is configured via proxy settings and PAC files, not via the security profile field, and setting it to 'None' would not force traffic through a proxy.

90
Multi-Selecthard

When troubleshooting a Prisma Access deployment where traffic from remote users is failing Threat Prevention inspection, which TWO components or configurations must be verified? (Choose two)

Select 2 answers
A.Decryption policy configuration ensuring traffic is not bypassing inspection
B.Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) API connector tokens
C.GlobalProtect user username-to-IP mapping agent status
D.Security Policy rules having appropriate Threat Prevention profiles (Antivirus, Vulnerability, Anti-Spyware) attached
E.Service Connection BGP peer keepalive intervals
AnswersA, D

Threat Prevention cannot inspect encrypted sessions, so a decryption policy that excludes or bypasses traffic leaves it uninspected. Verifying decryption ensures traffic is actually presented to the inspection engines, satisfying the requirement to confirm inspection is not bypassed.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because if a Decryption policy (SSL Forward Proxy) is not configured or the traffic is excluded from decryption, encrypted sessions bypass content inspection and Threat Prevention profiles cannot evaluate the payload, so the decryption policy must be verified to ensure traffic is not bypassing inspection. Option D is correct because Threat Prevention inspection only occurs when the matching Security Policy rule has the appropriate Threat Prevention profiles attached — Antivirus, Vulnerability Protection, and Anti-Spyware — so the rule must be checked to confirm these profiles are applied to the user traffic. Option B is not relevant because CASB API connector tokens relate to SaaS application visibility and data loss prevention via API-based out-of-band scanning, not inline Threat Prevention inspection of remote user traffic.

Option C is not relevant because the username-to-IP mapping agent affects user identification and policy matching, not the Threat Prevention inspection pipeline itself. Option E is not relevant because Service Connection BGP keepalive intervals affect routing adjacency stability between Prisma Access and on-premises/service connections, not Threat Prevention inspection of remote user traffic.

Exam trap

SSE-Engineer often tests whether candidates focus on routing or identity components when the issue is inspection — the trap is selecting User-ID or BGP options instead of the decryption and Security Profile prerequisites that actually enable Threat Prevention.

91
Multi-Selecthard

An administrator is troubleshooting a Prisma Access explicit proxy deployment where users report that specific web applications are failing with connection timeout errors. Which THREE areas should the administrator check? (Choose three)

Select 3 answers
A.Inspect Proxy Authentication and Decryption profiles to ensure authentication challenges are correctly processed.
B.Verify the BGP AS number on the Service Connection.
C.Check Security Policy rules to ensure traffic destined for the explicit proxy listener ports is allowed.
D.Verify that explicit proxy port settings and proxy profiles match what is configured on the client browser or PAC file.
E.Check the GlobalProtect client pre-logon timeout value.
AnswersA, C, D

Explicit proxy authentication challenges and decryption profiles determine whether the proxy can complete its handshake with the client. Misconfigured profiles stall that exchange, producing timeouts, so inspecting them satisfies the stem's requirement to check areas causing connection timeout errors.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because in a Prisma Access explicit proxy deployment, Proxy Authentication and Decryption profiles determine how the firewall handles authentication challenges and SSL decryption; if these are misconfigured, the proxy may silently drop or fail to respond to the client's CONNECT/GET requests, producing connection timeouts. Option C is correct because Security Policy rules must explicitly permit traffic to the explicit proxy listener ports (for example, TCP 8080) on the Prisma Access proxy; if the policy denies or does not match that traffic, sessions time out before reaching the proxy service. Option D is correct because the explicit proxy port and proxy profile configured on Prisma Access must match the port and PAC file/browser settings on the client; a mismatch means the browser sends requests to a port the proxy is not listening on, resulting in connection timeouts.

Option B is not relevant because BGP AS numbers apply to Service Connection routing and do not affect explicit proxy listener behavior or client proxy sessions. Option E is not relevant because GlobalProtect pre-logon timeout pertains to GlobalProtect remote access tunnels, not to explicit proxy web traffic.

Exam trap

SSE-Engineer often tests the tendency to blame routing (BGP) or GlobalProtect settings for explicit proxy issues, when the real causes are auth/decryption profiles, security policy for proxy ports, and client proxy configuration.

92
MCQeasy

A Prisma Access administrator is troubleshooting a mobile user who reports that they can connect via GlobalProtect but cannot access any internal resources. The administrator suspects that the issue is related to the user's group mapping. Which log type in Prisma Access should the administrator review to verify user-to-group mapping?

A.Threat logs
B.User-ID logs
C.GlobalProtect logs
D.Traffic logs
AnswerB

User-ID logs contain information about user identification events, including group mapping from sources like Active Directory or LDAP. These logs show which groups a user belongs to and can help diagnose why group-based policies are not matching. Reviewing User-ID logs is the correct way to verify that the user-to-group mapping is functioning as expected and that the user is associated with the correct groups.

Why this answer

User-to-group mapping in Prisma Access is handled by User-ID, which collects user information from directory services and maps users to groups. When a user cannot access internal resources despite a successful GlobalProtect connection, it is often because the user's group membership is not correctly recognized, causing group-based security policies to fail. The User-ID logs provide detailed information about user mapping events, including group associations, making them the correct logs to review.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that GlobalProtect logs include group mapping details, when they only show connection events.

93
MCQhard

A Prisma Access administrator is troubleshooting a remote network deployment where users experience intermittent connectivity failures. The administrator notices that the IPsec tunnel frequently flaps. Which component should the administrator check to determine if the tunnel is being renegotiated due to mismatched proposal settings?

A.The IKE and IPsec crypto profiles on both the branch CPE and the Prisma Access service connection.
B.The security policy rules applied to the remote network traffic.
C.The DNS proxy settings on the service connection.
D.The GlobalProtect portal configuration for mobile users.
AnswerA

IPsec tunnel flaps often result from mismatched IKE or IPsec crypto profiles between peers. The branch CPE and Prisma Access service connection must have identical proposal settings (encryption, authentication, DH group, lifetime). Checking both sides ensures they match. If they differ, the tunnel will fail to establish or will renegotiate frequently, causing intermittent connectivity. This is the correct component to verify.

Why this answer

Intermittent IPsec tunnel flaps are typically caused by mismatched crypto profiles or proposal settings. The IKE and IPsec crypto profiles must align on both the branch CPE and the Prisma Access service connection. Verifying these profiles ensures that the tunnel parameters match, preventing renegotiation failures.

GlobalProtect portal, security policies, and DNS proxy settings do not impact tunnel negotiation and are not relevant to this issue.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that security policies or DNS settings could cause tunnel flapping, when the issue is actually at the IPsec negotiation layer.

94
MCQmedium

An administrator notices that the Panorama management server is failing to push configuration updates to Prisma Access nodes. Where should the administrator check for configuration push failure details and error logs in Panorama?

A.Panorama > Job Status or Monitor > Logs > Config / System.
B.Cloud Services > Status > Remote Networks.
C.Device > High Availability.
D.Policies > Security > Audit.
AnswerA

Panorama records configuration push attempts and their failures under Job Status, with detailed errors in the Config and System logs. This satisfies the need to locate push failure details by pointing to the specific monitoring views.

Why this answer

Panorama surfaces configuration push results and errors in two places: the Job Status view (Panorama > Job Status) shows the outcome of each commit/push job including success, failure, and warnings, while Monitor > Logs > Config and Monitor > Logs > System capture the detailed config and system-level error messages generated during the push. Together these are the authoritative locations for diagnosing why a push to Prisma Access nodes failed.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing operational/health status dashboards (Cloud Services > Status) with the actual configuration push job and error log locations, causing candidates to pick a monitoring view instead of Job Status and Config/System logs.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because Cloud Services > Status > Remote Networks shows the operational/onboarding status of remote network sites (tunnel status, license, connectivity), not the configuration push job details or error logs. Option C is wrong because Device > High Availability configures HA peering between Panorama or firewall pairs and has nothing to do with push failure diagnostics. Option D is wrong because Policies > Security > Audit is not a Panorama location for reviewing push errors; security policy auditing is unrelated to configuration commit/push job troubleshooting.

95
MCQhard

A Prisma Access administrator is troubleshooting GlobalProtect mobile users who intermittently lose access to internal applications reachable through a service connection. The administrator confirms the service connection IPsec tunnels are up and BGP routes are present, but the users' sessions drop roughly every 30 minutes. Which action should the administrator take first to isolate the cause?

A.Restart the GlobalProtect gateway to force users to re-establish their tunnels.
B.Verify the idle timeout and session lifetime settings on the service connection and compare with the observed drop interval.
C.Review the URL Filtering logs to see if a category is blocking the internal application traffic.
D.Check the GlobalProtect app logs on the endpoint for HIP report submission failures.
AnswerB

A consistent 30-minute drop pattern strongly suggests a session or idle timeout mismatch on the service connection or IPSec tunnel. Checking these timers against the observed interval directly tests whether the infrastructure is tearing down idle sessions. Since tunnels and routes are confirmed up, timer expiration is the most likely explanation for periodic, predictable drops affecting multiple users.

Why this answer

A recurring, predictable disconnect interval points to a timer-based teardown rather than a policy or routing failure. Since the service connection tunnels are up and BGP routes are present, the administrator should examine session and idle timeout values on the service connection to see if they align with the observed 30-minute drop. This isolates whether the infrastructure is proactively expiring sessions before pursuing other causes.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that a periodic session drop must be caused by a policy block or routing flap, when a fixed interval more often indicates a timeout or session lifetime setting.

96
Multi-Selecthard

An administrator is troubleshooting a Prisma Access mobile user deployment where GlobalProtect clients are unable to connect. Which THREE components or settings should the administrator inspect to resolve the connection failure? (Choose three)

Select 3 answers
A.Inspect the GlobalProtect Client Settings in Panorama to ensure gateways and agent configurations are correctly assigned.
B.Verify that the SSL/TLS certificates assigned to the GlobalProtect Portal and Gateways are valid and trusted by client devices.
C.Check the WildFire file size upload limit for malicious attachments.
D.Verify the BGP AS number configured on the customer data center router.
E.Check the Authentication Profile to ensure RADIUS, LDAP, or SAML servers are reachable and responding.
AnswersA, B, E

GlobalProtect Client Settings in Panorama determine which portals, gateways and agent configurations are pushed to endpoints; misassignment prevents clients from connecting. Inspecting them satisfies the stem's requirement to check the configuration components governing mobile user connectivity.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because the GlobalProtect Client Settings in Panorama determine which portals and gateways are pushed to the agent, and misassigned or missing gateway/agent configurations will prevent clients from connecting. Option B is correct because the portal and gateway present SSL/TLS certificates during the connection handshake; if these certificates are expired, have an untrusted chain, or use a hostname not matching the certificate, clients will reject the connection. Option E is correct because the Authentication Profile governs how users authenticate (RADIUS, LDAP, or SAML); if those servers are unreachable or not responding, the portal or gateway authentication step fails and the client cannot establish a session.

Option C is not relevant because the WildFire file size upload limit affects threat inspection of file uploads, not GlobalProtect client connectivity. Option D is not relevant because the BGP AS number on a data center router pertains to routing peering with Prisma Access, not to mobile user GlobalProtect tunnel establishment.

Exam trap

SSE-Engineer often tests including unrelated components like WildFire or BGP in GlobalProtect troubleshooting, causing candidates to select distractors that are not part of the connection path.

97
MCQeasy

An administrator is troubleshooting a policy where applications are being identified incorrectly in Prisma Access. Which tool should be used to inspect how Prisma Access performs App-ID identification on a live stream of packets?

A.Verify the SSL decryption certificate chain.
B.Check the GlobalProtect client configuration profile.
C.Examine the Traffic log session details to view the detected App-ID, or use packet captures if necessary.
D.Review the Panorama Audit log.
AnswerC

Traffic log session details expose the App-ID Prisma Access assigned to each flow, letting the administrator compare detected application against expectation. Packet captures supplement this when the signature decision needs deeper inspection, directly satisfying the requirement to inspect live App-ID identification.

Why this answer

To troubleshoot App-ID misidentification, you inspect the Traffic log session details, which show the detected application, the App-ID that was applied, and the reason for the identification (e.g., signature, port, decryption status). If more detail is needed, packet captures can be taken to see the actual traffic. This is the standard troubleshooting workflow for App-ID issues in Prisma Access.

Exam trap

SSE-Engineer often tests the confusion between decryption troubleshooting and App-ID troubleshooting, leading candidates to focus on certificates when the question asks how to inspect App-ID identification on live traffic.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because verifying the SSL decryption certificate chain addresses decryption failures, not App-ID identification logic — while decryption can affect App-ID, the question asks for the tool to inspect how App-ID is performed, which is the Traffic log. Option B is wrong because the GlobalProtect client configuration profile controls client settings (split tunnel, DNS, etc.), not App-ID identification on the firewall. Option D is wrong because the Panorama Audit log records administrative configuration changes, not live traffic App-ID decisions.

98
MCQmedium

A Prisma Access administrator notices that a specific remote network tunnel shows as up, but the branch users cannot reach any internet destinations. The tunnel interface on the branch CPE is up, and the administrator can ping the Prisma Access service IP. Which log type on the Prisma Access side should the administrator review first to determine whether traffic is being dropped by a security policy?

A.Traffic logs
B.System logs
C.HIP Match logs
D.Threat logs
AnswerA

Traffic logs in Prisma Access record session details including source, destination, application, and the policy action (allow/deny). They are the primary source for determining whether a security policy is blocking traffic. Since the tunnel is up and the service IP is reachable, the next logical step is to check if sessions are being denied. Traffic logs will show the rule that matched and the reason for denial, directly answering the question.

Why this answer

When a remote network tunnel is up but users cannot reach the internet, the immediate suspicion is a security policy misconfiguration or a routing issue. Traffic logs on Prisma Access capture session-level details, including the applied security rule and action. Reviewing them will show if traffic is being denied and by which rule, enabling quick remediation.

System, threat, and HIP logs do not provide this policy enforcement visibility for remote network traffic.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that because the tunnel is up, the issue must be a threat or system-level problem, leading to checking the wrong log type.

← PreviousPage 2 of 2 · 98 questions total

Ready to test yourself?

Try a timed practice session using only Troubleshooting questions.