An administrator is using the Palo Alto Networks Expedition tool to migrate a configuration from a competitor firewall to a Palo Alto Networks firewall. After importing the competitor's configuration, the administrator notices that some rules are not being translated correctly. Which step should the administrator take to improve the translation accuracy?
Expedition has a built-in parser that translates configurations from various vendors. If rules are not translated correctly, the administrator can adjust the translation settings, such as mapping objects and services, or use the tool's suggestions. Expedition also provides a validation step to identify issues. By using these features, the administrator can improve translation accuracy without manual rewriting. This is the correct approach to refine the migration.
Why this answer
Expedition is a free tool from Palo Alto Networks designed to help migrate configurations from other vendors. It uses parsers to translate rules, objects, and policies. If translations are incorrect, the administrator can adjust the translation settings, such as mapping services and applications, or use the tool's built-in validation and suggestion features.
This iterative process improves accuracy. Manually rewriting rules or using unsupported methods is not recommended.
Exam trap
The trap here is thinking that Expedition requires manual rewriting of all rules, when it actually provides tools to refine and correct translations automatically.