PCNSE Practice Question: Managing Troubleshooting and High Availability
Exhibit
Refer to the exhibit.
admin@PA-5050> show high-availability state
Group 1 (active/active):
Local HA state: active-secondary
Peer HA state: active-primary
Link monitoring: enabled
Path monitoring: enabled
Heartbeat: OK
Last failover reason: path-group-down
admin@PA-5050> show high-availability link-monitoring
Link Group: uplink
ethernet1/1: up
ethernet1/2: down
ethernet1/3: up
ethernet1/4: up
admin@PA-5050> show high-availability path-monitoring
Path Group: internet
10.0.0.1: up
10.0.0.2: upRefer to the exhibit. An active/active HA pair shows the local firewall as active-secondary. The last failover reason is 'path-group-down'. What should the administrator investigate first?
⚠ Common exam trap
Many exam-takers confuse 'path-group-down' with HA link failures or session synchronization issues, leading them to investigate HA2 links or session tables instead of the specific interface and path monitoring configuration.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Verify the link status of interface ethernet1/2 and its association with the path monitoring group.
The 'path-group-down' failover reason indicates that the firewall detected a failure in a monitored path group, which is associated with specific interfaces. Option B is correct because the administrator should first verify the link status of interface ethernet1/2 and its association with the path monitoring group, as this directly addresses the root cause of the failover trigger. Path monitoring is used to detect upstream connectivity loss and can cause a firewall to transition to active-secondary if the monitored path fails.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Inspect the session table for asymmetric routing between the firewalls.
Why it's wrong here
Asymmetric routing is a different issue; the failover reason directly points to path monitoring.
- ✓
Verify the link status of interface ethernet1/2 and its association with the path monitoring group.
Why this is correct
The link is down, and if it is used for path monitoring, it could cause the path group to go down.
- ✗
Ensure the HA2 link is properly connected and firewalls can synchronize sessions.
Why it's wrong here
Heartbeat is OK, so HA2 is likely working; the issue is path monitoring.
- ✗
Check the HA priority settings to ensure the local firewall should be active-secondary.
Why it's wrong here
Priority determines which firewall becomes primary, but the failover reason indicates a path issue, not priority.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
One of 504 original PCNSE practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This PCNSE practice question is part of Courseiva's free Palo Alto Networks certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PCNSE exam.