Courseiva
Secure Access and VPNmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

PCNSE Secure Access and VPN Practice Question

A network administrator is troubleshooting an IPsec site-to-site VPN that fails to establish. IKE phase 1 completes successfully, but phase 2 fails with a 'no proposal chosen' message. Both sides have identical IKE and IPsec crypto profiles, and the pre-shared key is correct. What is the most likely cause of the failure?

⚠ Common exam trap

Candidates often assume identical crypto profiles guarantee phase 2 success, overlooking that proxy IDs (traffic selectors) are a separate, critical parameter that must be mirrored exactly on both peers.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The proxy IDs (local/remote subnets) do not match between peers

In IPsec site-to-site VPNs, IKE phase 1 establishes the secure management channel using parameters like encryption, authentication, and Diffie-Hellman groups. Phase 2 negotiates the IPsec security associations (SAs) for actual data traffic, and the 'no proposal chosen' error indicates a mismatch in the phase 2 parameters. Since both sides have identical crypto profiles and the pre-shared key is correct, the most likely cause is that the proxy IDs (local and remote subnets) do not match between peers. Proxy IDs define the traffic selectors that each peer expects to protect; if they are misaligned, the IPsec SA negotiation fails even if all other settings are identical.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The proxy IDs (local/remote subnets) do not match between peers

    Why this is correct

    Mismatched proxy IDs are the most common cause of phase 2 failure.

  • The tunnel is configured as route-based instead of policy-based

    Why it's wrong here

    Route-based VPNs also require proxy IDs for phase 2.

  • The IKE gateway's local interface is down

    Why it's wrong here

    Phase 1 would not complete if the interface were down.

  • Dead peer detection is not enabled on the IKE gateway

    Why it's wrong here

    DPD does not affect IPsec proposal negotiation.

Visual reference

192.168.1.0 /24 256 addresses (254 usable) 192.168.1.0 /25 Subnet A 128 addr (126 usable) 192.168.1.128 /25 Subnet B 128 addr (126 usable) Borrowing 1 bit from host portion creates 2 subnets (/25)

Quick reference

VPN Protocol Comparison

ProtocolPortEncryptionAuthenticationUse Case
IKEv2 / IPsecUDP 500 / 4500AES-256Certificates / PSKSite-to-site & remote access
SSL / TLS VPNTCP 443TLS 1.3Certificates / MFAClientless remote access
L2TP / IPsecUDP 1701AES (IPsec)PSK / CertificatesLegacy remote access
WireGuardUDP 51820ChaCha20Public keysModern high-performance VPN
PPTPTCP 1723MPPE (weak)MS-CHAPv2Legacy — avoid in production

PPTP is considered insecure. IKEv2/IPsec and SSL VPN are the current recommended options.

About these practice questions

One of 504 original PCNSE practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This PCNSE practice question is part of Courseiva's free Palo Alto Networks certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PCNSE exam.