Courseiva
Deploy and Configure FirewallseasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

PCNSE Deploy and Configure Firewalls Practice Question

A company has a pair of Palo Alto Networks firewalls in active/passive HA. The active firewall manages all traffic. Recently, the network team reconfigured the virtual router by adding a new static route to a remote subnet via a next-hop IP on the same interface. After committing, they noticed that the passive firewall's management IP became unreachable. The active firewall continues to pass traffic normally. What is the most likely cause?

⚠ Common exam trap

It's easy for candidates to assume all routing configurations, including management routes, are synchronized in HA, but Palo Alto Networks separates management plane routing from dataplane virtual routers, and only the dataplane config is synced.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The passive firewall has lost its management route

In an active/passive HA pair, the passive firewall synchronizes its configuration from the active firewall, including virtual router settings. However, management IP reachability depends on the management network's routing table, which is separate from the dataplane virtual router. Adding a static route to the virtual router does not automatically add a corresponding management route. The passive firewall's management IP became unreachable because it lost its default gateway or specific management route, likely due to a misconfiguration or failure to synchronize the management plane's routing information, which is not part of the HA config sync.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The passive firewall has lost its management route

    Why this is correct

    The new static route added in the virtual router likely overwrote the default route or specifically the management subnet route, making the management IP unreachable on the passive firewall.

  • The HA link is down

    Why it's wrong here

    If the HA link were down, the passive firewall would still have its own management route; the issue is specifically with routing.

  • The static route is causing a routing loop

    Why it's wrong here

    A routing loop would affect traffic on both firewalls, not just the passive management IP.

  • The virtual router configuration is not synchronized to the passive peer

    Why it's wrong here

    Configuration sync is automatic in HA; the passive firewall received the same configuration, causing the route conflict.

Visual reference

192.168.1.0 /24 256 addresses (254 usable) 192.168.1.0 /25 Subnet A 128 addr (126 usable) 192.168.1.128 /25 Subnet B 128 addr (126 usable) Borrowing 1 bit from host portion creates 2 subnets (/25)

About these practice questions

One of 504 original PCNSE practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This PCNSE practice question is part of Courseiva's free Palo Alto Networks certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PCNSE exam.