- A
Conditional Access policy
Why wrong: Conditional Access controls access but does not modify group membership.
- B
Privileged Identity Management
Why wrong: PIM manages just-in-time access for roles, not groups.
- C
Access reviews in Identity Governance
Access reviews can automatically remove inactive users.
- D
Microsoft Entra ID Protection
Why wrong: ID Protection focuses on risk events, not inactivity.
SC-900 Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra Practice Question
This SC-900 practice question tests your understanding of describe the capabilities of microsoft entra. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
Your organization uses Microsoft Entra ID P2 licenses. You need to implement a process to automatically remove users from a group if they have not signed in for 90 days. Which feature should you use?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Access reviews in Identity Governance
Access reviews in Identity Governance allow you to automate the review and removal of group memberships based on inactivity criteria, such as users who haven't signed in for 90 days. This feature is specifically designed for periodic attestation and lifecycle management of group memberships, leveraging Microsoft Entra ID P2 licenses.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Conditional Access policy
Why it's wrong here
Conditional Access controls access but does not modify group membership.
- ✗
Privileged Identity Management
Why it's wrong here
PIM manages just-in-time access for roles, not groups.
- ✓
Access reviews in Identity Governance
Why this is correct
Access reviews can automatically remove inactive users.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Microsoft Entra ID Protection
Why it's wrong here
ID Protection focuses on risk events, not inactivity.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is confusing Access Reviews (which handle membership lifecycle based on inactivity) with Conditional Access (which controls access at sign-in) or Privileged Identity Management (which focuses on privileged roles).
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Access reviews use a recurring schedule (e.g., weekly, monthly) to evaluate group membership against criteria like 'Last sign-in' date, which is compared against the 90-day threshold. Under the hood, the review process queries the Microsoft Graph sign-in activity logs and can auto-apply results (e.g., remove users) after the review period ends, with optional admin or reviewer approval. This is distinct from dynamic group rules, which use attribute-based membership but cannot directly reference sign-in timestamps for removal.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SC-900 questions
1,411 questions across all exam domains
- →
Microsoft Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals SC-900 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SC-900 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SC-900 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra.
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft security solutions practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to Describe the capabilities of Microsoft security solutions.
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft compliance solutions practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to Describe the capabilities of Microsoft compliance solutions.
Describe the concepts of security, compliance, and identity practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to Describe the concepts of security, compliance, and identity.
SC-900 fundamentals practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to SC-900 fundamentals.
SC-900 scenario practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to SC-900 scenario.
SC-900 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to SC-900 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free SC-900 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SC-900 question test?
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra — This question tests Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Access reviews in Identity Governance — Access reviews in Identity Governance allow you to automate the review and removal of group memberships based on inactivity criteria, such as users who haven't signed in for 90 days. This feature is specifically designed for periodic attestation and lifecycle management of group memberships, leveraging Microsoft Entra ID P2 licenses.
What should I do if I get this SC-900 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026
This SC-900 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-900 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.