Courseiva

eDiscovery Manager Role for Legal Hold on Mailbox

Your organization uses Microsoft Purview eDiscovery to manage legal cases. You need to place a hold on a user's mailbox to preserve data for an ongoing litigation. Which role do you need to assign to the eDiscovery manager?

Quick Answer

The correct answer is the eDiscovery Manager role with the Legal Hold role enabled. This is because the eDiscovery Manager role group in Microsoft Purview includes the Legal Hold sub-role, which grants the specific permission to place a hold on a user’s mailbox to preserve data for litigation. Without this sub-role enabled, an eDiscovery Manager can search and export content but cannot freeze data from deletion. On the SC-900 exam, this tests your understanding of role-based permissions within Microsoft Purview compliance portals, often appearing as a scenario where you must distinguish between broad roles like Compliance Administrator and specialized roles like eDiscovery Manager. A common trap is assuming any compliance role can place holds, but only the eDiscovery Manager with the Legal Hold toggle turned on has that precise authority. Memory tip: think “eDiscovery holds the evidence, Legal Hold locks the door.”

⚠ Common exam trap

Watch out — candidates often assume the eDiscovery Manager role alone is sufficient to place holds, but Microsoft explicitly separates the Legal Hold sub-role to enforce least privilege, so the correct answer requires both the role group and the specific sub-role enabled.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

eDiscovery Manager (with the Legal Hold role enabled)

To place a hold on a user's mailbox in Microsoft Purview eDiscovery, you need the eDiscovery Manager role group with the Legal Hold role enabled. This role specifically grants the permission to create and manage litigation holds, which preserve mailbox content for legal cases. Without the Legal Hold sub-role, an eDiscovery Manager can search and export but cannot apply holds.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Records Management

    Why it's wrong here

    Records Management focuses on retention and disposal, not holds.

  • Information Protection

    Why it's wrong here

    Information Protection deals with sensitivity labels, not holds.

  • eDiscovery Manager (with the Legal Hold role enabled)

    Why this is correct

    The eDiscovery Manager role group includes the Legal Hold role, which allows placing holds.

  • Compliance Administrator

    Why it's wrong here

    Compliance Administrator has wider permissions but is not the specific role for eDiscovery holds.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every SC-900 question from scratch — 1,250 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more way this is tested on SC-900

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. Your organization uses Microsoft Purview eDiscovery to manage legal holds. A legal hold has been placed on a user’s mailbox, but the user has left the company and their mailbox has been converted to a shared mailbox. You need to ensure that the legal hold remains effective. What should you do?

easy
  • A.Convert the shared mailbox back to a user mailbox to keep the hold.
  • B.Create a new legal hold for the shared mailbox.
  • C.Verify that the legal hold is still listed in the eDiscovery case for the mailbox.
  • D.Remove the legal hold and reapply it to the shared mailbox.

Why C: When a mailbox is converted to a shared mailbox, the legal hold applied via eDiscovery remains in effect and does not need to be recreated. It is important to verify that the hold is still listed in the eDiscovery case. Option A is incorrect because converting back is unnecessary and may lose shared mailbox features. Option B is incorrect because the hold is still active; creating a new hold is redundant. Option D is incorrect because removing and reapplying the hold is not required.

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This SC-900 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-900 exam.