Question 1,582 of 1,639
Respond to security incidentshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is that the automation rule does not have an owner assigned. This is the most likely cause because Microsoft Sentinel automation rules require a designated owner to execute playbooks; without an owner, the rule is considered incomplete and will not trigger its actions, even if all other conditions are met. On the SC-200 exam, this concept tests your understanding of automation rule permissions and dependencies, often appearing as a distractor where you might mistakenly blame the trigger condition or action order. A common trap is assuming a rule will run as long as its logic is correct, but Microsoft enforces the owner requirement as a security and accountability measure. Remember the mnemonic: "No owner, no runner" — if a playbook fails to fire, always check the rule’s owner assignment first.

SC-200 Respond to security incidents Practice Question

This SC-200 practice question tests your understanding of respond to security incidents. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Exhibit

Refer to the exhibit.

```json
{
  "type": "Microsoft.SecurityInsights/automationRules",
  "apiVersion": "2023-02-01-preview",
  "properties": {
    "displayName": "Contain Malicious IP",
    "order": 1,
    "triggeringLogic": {
      "triggersOn": "Incidents",
      "triggersWhen": "Created",
      "conditions": [
        {
          "property": "IncidentSeverity",
          "operator": "Equals",
          "value": "High"
        }
      ]
    },
    "actions": [
      {
        "order": 1,
        "actionType": "RunPlaybook",
        "actionConfiguration": {
          "logicAppResourceId": "/subscriptions/.../blockIP",
          "tenantId": "..."
        }
      }
    ]
  }
}
```

You are reviewing an automation rule in Microsoft Sentinel. The rule triggers on incident creation with severity High. However, during a recent High severity incident, the playbook did not run. What is the most likely cause?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Read the full Ansible explanation →

Exhibit

Refer to the exhibit.

```json
{
  "type": "Microsoft.SecurityInsights/automationRules",
  "apiVersion": "2023-02-01-preview",
  "properties": {
    "displayName": "Contain Malicious IP",
    "order": 1,
    "triggeringLogic": {
      "triggersOn": "Incidents",
      "triggersWhen": "Created",
      "conditions": [
        {
          "property": "IncidentSeverity",
          "operator": "Equals",
          "value": "High"
        }
      ]
    },
    "actions": [
      {
        "order": 1,
        "actionType": "RunPlaybook",
        "actionConfiguration": {
          "logicAppResourceId": "/subscriptions/.../blockIP",
          "tenantId": "..."
        }
      }
    ]
  }
}
```

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The automation rule does not have an owner assigned.

Option B is correct because automation rules require an assigned owner to run playbooks. Option A is wrong because the rule triggers on creation, not closure. Option C is wrong because the condition is correct for High severity. Option D is wrong because the action order is fine.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The action order is set to 1, but another action has a higher priority.

    Why it's wrong here

    Order 1 is the highest priority.

  • The automation rule does not have an owner assigned.

    Why this is correct

    Automation rules must have an owner to run playbooks.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The condition requires IncidentSeverity equals High, but the incident was classified as Medium.

    Why it's wrong here

    The scenario says the incident was High severity.

  • The rule triggers on incident creation, but the incident was first closed and then reopened.

    Why it's wrong here

    The rule triggers on Created, which is the initial creation.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Trap categories for this question

  • Scenario analysis trap

    The scenario says the incident was High severity.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related SC-200 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SC-200 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SC-200 question test?

Respond to security incidents — This question tests Respond to security incidents — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The automation rule does not have an owner assigned. — Option B is correct because automation rules require an assigned owner to run playbooks. Option A is wrong because the rule triggers on creation, not closure. Option C is wrong because the condition is correct for High severity. Option D is wrong because the action order is fine.

What should I do if I get this SC-200 question wrong?

Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 21, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SC-200 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-200 exam.