- A
Disable analytics rules for low-severity alerts
Why wrong: Disabling rules stops all alerts, including important ones.
- B
Change the severity of low-severity alerts to Informational in the analytics rule
Why wrong: Changing severity does not prevent incident creation.
- C
Create an automation rule to close low-severity incidents automatically
Why wrong: Automation rules act on incidents after creation, still flooding the queue.
- D
Modify the incident creation rule to only create incidents for alerts with severity High or Medium
This filters alerts before incident creation, reducing noise.
Quick Answer
The correct choice is to modify the incident creation rule to only create incidents for alerts with severity High or Medium. This directly addresses the need to reduce alert noise by filtering out low-severity alerts before they become incidents, preventing analyst fatigue while ensuring critical threats are still escalated. On the Microsoft Security Operations Analyst SC-200 exam, this concept tests your understanding of how incident creation rules act as a gatekeeper in Microsoft Sentinel, controlling which alerts are promoted to full incidents based on severity thresholds. A common trap is confusing automation rules, which operate after incident creation, or disabling analytics rules entirely, which would stop all alert generation. The key distinction is that incident creation rules filter at the point of incident generation, not after. For a quick memory tip, think of it as "severity sieve before the incident pile"—only High and Medium alerts make it through to the analyst queue.
SC-200 Respond to security incidents Practice Question
This SC-200 practice question tests your understanding of respond to security incidents. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
During a security incident, the Microsoft Sentinel workspace is receiving high volume of low-severity alerts causing analyst fatigue. You need to reduce noise while ensuring critical alerts are not missed. What should you configure?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Modify the incident creation rule to only create incidents for alerts with severity High or Medium
Option C is correct because incident creation rules can filter by alert severity to only create incidents for high and medium severity, reducing noise. Option A is wrong because disabling analytics rules would stop all alerts. Option B is wrong because automation rules trigger after incident creation, not before. Option D is wrong because setting severity to Informational would not help filter.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Disable analytics rules for low-severity alerts
Why it's wrong here
Disabling rules stops all alerts, including important ones.
- ✗
Change the severity of low-severity alerts to Informational in the analytics rule
Why it's wrong here
Changing severity does not prevent incident creation.
- ✗
Create an automation rule to close low-severity incidents automatically
Why it's wrong here
Automation rules act on incidents after creation, still flooding the queue.
- ✓
Modify the incident creation rule to only create incidents for alerts with severity High or Medium
Why this is correct
This filters alerts before incident creation, reducing noise.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
- Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.
TExam Day Tips
- Underline the problem statement mentally.
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
- →
Respond to security incidents — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Respond to security incidents practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SC-200 questions
1,639 questions across all exam domains
- →
Microsoft Security Operations Analyst SC-200 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SC-200 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SC-200 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Manage a security operations environment practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Manage a security operations environment.
Respond to security incidents practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Respond to security incidents.
Perform threat hunting practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Perform threat hunting.
Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender XDR practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender XDR.
Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender for Cloud practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel.
SC-200 fundamentals practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 fundamentals.
SC-200 scenario practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 scenario.
SC-200 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free SC-200 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SC-200 question test?
Respond to security incidents — This question tests Respond to security incidents — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Modify the incident creation rule to only create incidents for alerts with severity High or Medium — Option C is correct because incident creation rules can filter by alert severity to only create incidents for high and medium severity, reducing noise. Option A is wrong because disabling analytics rules would stop all alerts. Option B is wrong because automation rules trigger after incident creation, not before. Option D is wrong because setting severity to Informational would not help filter.
What should I do if I get this SC-200 question wrong?
Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 21, 2026
This SC-200 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-200 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.