Courseiva

MB-310 Implement Financial Management Practice Question

You want to prevent users from editing posted transactions in the General ledger. Which security or configuration setting is the most appropriate?

⚠ Common exam trap

Candidates often look for security roles or permissions to prevent editing, missing the fact that these are controlled by global configuration parameters in the General Ledger module.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

General ledger parameters

Preventing the editing of posted transactions is a foundational internal control. By setting the 'Allow editing in journal' and 'Allow editing of posted transactions' parameters to 'No' in General Ledger parameters, you maintain an immutable audit trail. This ensures that historical data cannot be altered after the fact, which is a mandatory requirement for financial transparency and compliance with standard accounting practices.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✓

    General ledger parameters

    Why this is correct

    The General ledger parameters provide the settings to control whether posted transactions can be edited. Disabling these options is the standard way to enforce an immutable audit trail, ensuring that financial history remains accurate and tamper-proof for auditing purposes.

  • ✗

    Security roles

    Why it's wrong here

    While you can remove access to edit forms via security roles, the core system behavior for editing posted transactions is controlled by the ledger parameters. Relying solely on security roles is difficult to maintain and does not leverage the built-in system-wide controls.

  • ✗

    Financial dimension sets

    Why it's wrong here

    Financial dimension sets are for reporting purposes. They have no impact on the security or editability of transactions. Using them for this purpose would be incorrect and ineffective, as they don't have the capability to influence record-level operations.

  • ✗

    Account structure validation

    Why it's wrong here

    Account structure validation ensures that dimensions are correct during the posting process, but it does not dictate whether a transaction can be edited after it has been posted. This is a completely different control level that focuses on input validation.

About these practice questions

One of 211 original MB-310 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Microsoft exam blueprint

This MB-310 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MB-310 exam.