Courseiva
Implement and Manage an Analytics SolutionhardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

DP-700 Implement and Manage an Analytics Solution Practice Question

A data engineering team is setting up Git integration for a Microsoft Fabric workspace. They need to ensure that the synchronization process is robust and follows best practices for collaborative development. Which TWO actions should the team perform to successfully manage version control for Fabric items? (Choose TWO)

⚠ Common exam trap

Candidates often assume that Git integration happens automatically or via the admin portal, missing the requirement to manually connect the workspace to a specific Git repository branch.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Connect the workspace to an Azure DevOps Git repository and branch.

Git integration in Fabric requires both a connection to a supported remote repository and an understanding of how workspace items are serialized into metadata. Proper synchronization involves committing local workspace changes to the remote branch and managing conflicts through standard Git workflows. This process bridges the gap between low-code workspace editing and professional software development practices for data teams.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Connect the workspace to an Azure DevOps Git repository and branch.

    Why this is correct

    The primary requirement for Git integration is establishing a secure link between the Fabric workspace and a specific branch in an Azure DevOps repository. This connection enables the bi-directional flow of metadata, allowing developers to sync their workspace items with source control. It serves as the foundation for versioning, auditing, and collaborative development within the environment.

  • Manually export item .bim files and upload them to a GitHub repository.

    Why it's wrong here

    Manual exports are prone to human error and do not provide the automated synchronization or change tracking offered by native Git integration. This approach bypasses the built-in Fabric source control features and makes it difficult to maintain a consistent state between the workspace and the repository. It is an inefficient method that lacks the governance required for modern analytics.

  • Use the Source Control panel in the workspace to commit and sync changes.

    Why this is correct

    The Source Control panel within the Fabric UI is the central hub for managing updates between the live workspace and the connected Git branch. It allows users to view pending changes, add commit messages, and resolve synchronization status indicators. Utilizing this panel ensures that the workspace state is properly recorded and shared with other team members through the repository.

  • Assign the Workspace Admin role to the Service Principal used for Git.

    Why it's wrong here

    While permissions are necessary, Git integration in Fabric typically uses the identity of the logged-in user rather than a standalone Service Principal for standard workspace sync. Assigning excessive admin roles to a Service Principal does not facilitate the version control process itself. Focus should remain on user permissions and repository access rights to ensure secure and effective synchronization.

  • Convert all Lakehouses to Warehouses to enable Git compatibility.

    Why it's wrong here

    Both Lakehouses and Warehouses are supported in various capacities by Fabric's Git integration features, so converting types is unnecessary and counterproductive. Each artifact type has its specific use case, and Git integration is designed to handle different item types by serializing their unique metadata formats. Forcing a conversion would disrupt the data architecture without providing any version control benefits.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every DP-700 question from scratch — 152 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Microsoft exam blueprint

This DP-700 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DP-700 exam.