Courseiva

DP-300 Practice Question: Monitor, configure, and optimize database resources

You are the database administrator for a large e-commerce company. The production Azure SQL Database (Business Critical, 16 vCores) hosts the order processing system. Recently, users report that order submissions are slow during peak hours. You examine the wait statistics and find that `LCK_M_IX` waits are the top wait type. You also notice that the stored procedure `usp_PlaceOrder` performs an `UPDATE` on the `Orders` table, and there is a high volume of concurrent transactions. The table has a clustered index on `OrderID` and a nonclustered index on `CustomerID`. The procedure uses serializable isolation level. Which action will most effectively reduce the blocking?

⚠ Common exam trap

Test-takers frequently assume scaling up hardware (Option A) or adding indexes (Option C) will fix blocking, when the root cause is the isolation level's locking behavior, which requires a concurrency model change like RCSI.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Change the database to use read committed snapshot isolation (RCSI) and modify the procedure to use read committed.

The primary issue is blocking caused by `LCK_M_IX` waits under the serializable isolation level, which holds range locks and prevents concurrent updates. Changing to read committed snapshot isolation (RCSI) and using read committed eliminates these locks by providing statement-level row versioning, allowing concurrent transactions to read without blocking writers. This directly addresses the high volume of concurrent `UPDATE` operations without requiring schema or hardware changes.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Increase the vCore count to 24.

    Why it's wrong here

    More compute does not reduce blocking.

  • Convert the Orders table to a memory-optimized table.

    Why it's wrong here

    Memory-optimized tables require application changes and are complex.

  • Add a nonclustered index on the Status column of the Orders table.

    Why it's wrong here

    Index on Status does not reduce locking conflicts.

  • Change the database to use read committed snapshot isolation (RCSI) and modify the procedure to use read committed.

    Why this is correct

    RCSI uses row versioning to avoid locks.

About these practice questions

This DP-300 question is part of Courseiva's 906-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This DP-300 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DP-300 exam.