Courseiva
hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

DP-203 Practice Question: A company has an Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2…

A company has an Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 account. They want to ensure that only users with the 'Data Reader' role can access files in a specific container, while other users cannot list or read files. The storage account has hierarchical namespace enabled. What is the most secure and manageable approach?

⚠ Common exam trap

It's easy for candidates to confuse row-level security (a database concept) with file-level security in Data Lake Storage, or they assume that a storage firewall can filter by user role, when in fact it only filters by network source IP.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Set POSIX-like access control lists (ACLs) on the container folder for the Data Reader role

Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 with hierarchical namespace enabled supports POSIX-like access control lists (ACLs) at the container and folder level. By setting ACLs on the specific container folder to grant 'Read' and 'Execute' permissions only to the 'Data Reader' role (or its associated security group), you enforce least-privilege access without affecting other containers. This approach is both secure and manageable, as ACLs are inherited by default and can be centrally managed via Azure RBAC integration.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Assign the Storage Blob Data Reader role at the storage account level and use row-level security

    Why it's wrong here

    RBAC at account level applies to all containers; row-level security is not for storage.

  • Generate a shared access signature (SAS) token for each user

    Why it's wrong here

    SAS tokens are less manageable and require token distribution.

  • Configure a storage firewall to allow only the Data Reader role's IP addresses

    Why it's wrong here

    Firewall controls network access, not user-level permissions.

  • Set POSIX-like access control lists (ACLs) on the container folder for the Data Reader role

    Why this is correct

    ACLs provide fine-grained permissions at the file/directory level for specific users/groups.

Visual reference

Source Router + ACL permit 10.0.0.0/8 deny any Server 10.0.0.5 ✓ 192.168.1.1 ✗ dropped ACLs evaluate top-down; first match wins — implicit deny all at end

Quick reference

Access Control Model Comparison

ModelAcronymWho Controls Access?Best For
Discretionary Access ControlDACResource ownerSmall teams, file shares
Mandatory Access ControlMACSystem / security labelsClassified govt / military
Role-Based Access ControlRBACAdministrator (via roles)Enterprise environments
Attribute-Based Access ControlABACPolicy engine (user + resource attributes)Fine-grained, dynamic policies
Rule-Based Access ControlRuBACSystem rules / ACLsFirewall rules, network ACLs

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

One of 760 original DP-203 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This DP-203 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DP-203 exam.