Courseiva
Describe Azure architecture and serviceshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

AZ-900 Describe Azure architecture and services Practice Question

A company plans to run a large-scale batch processing job on Azure that runs for 10 hours every night. The job is fault-tolerant and can be interrupted. They want to minimize cost as much as possible. Which Azure virtual machine pricing option should they use?

⚠ Common exam trap

It's easy for candidates to choose Reserved Instances thinking they always save the most money, but they fail to recognize that Spot VMs offer even greater savings for interruptible workloads without any upfront commitment.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Spot VMs

Spot VMs allow you to use unused Azure compute capacity at a significant discount (up to 90% compared to pay-as-you-go). Because the batch job is fault-tolerant and can be interrupted, it is an ideal workload for Spot VMs, which can be evicted when Azure needs the capacity back. This minimizes cost while meeting the job's requirements.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Reserved Instances

    Why it's wrong here

    Reserved Instances provide a discount for committing to a 1 or 3 year term. However, they are not cost-effective for a nightly 10-hour job because the reservation covers the VM 24/7, even when not used.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A company runs a critical, always-on web application that requires consistent performance and uptime, and they can commit to a 1- or 3-year term to achieve the lowest possible cost for that steady-state workload.

  • Spot VMs

    Why this is correct

    Spot VMs are the cheapest option because they run on unused Azure capacity at a steep discount (often up to 90% compared to pay-as-you-go). Since the described batch job is fault-tolerant and can be interrupted, it can handle the eviction notice Azure gives before reclaiming capacity. This makes Spot VMs the ideal cost-optimization choice despite the risk of eviction, as the job can simply pause and resume later.

  • Pay-as-you-go

    Why it's wrong here

    Pay-as-you-go (PAYG) charges per second for compute capacity with no upfront commitment, making it flexible but relatively expensive for sustained workloads. Because the batch job runs for 10 hours nightly and can tolerate interruptions, Spot VMs offer the same compute capability at a fraction of the PAYG price. Choosing PAYG would ignore the workload's fault tolerance and forgo significant cost savings.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A company needs to run a critical, non-interruptible application 24/7 and requires maximum flexibility with no upfront commitment or long-term contract. Pay-as-you-go would be the correct choice.

  • Dedicated Hosts

    Why it's wrong here

    Dedicated Hosts provide physical servers dedicated to a single customer, ensuring hardware isolation for compliance and licensing requirements. They are the most expensive compute pricing model because you pay for the entire host regardless of VM usage. For a purely cost-sensitive, interruption-tolerant batch job, they would dramatically overspend and provide no benefit.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A company requires compliance with specific security or licensing policies that mandate dedicated physical servers (e.g., for a regulated workload that cannot share hardware with other tenants).

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The AZ-900 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Spot VMsCorrect answer

Why this is correct

Spot VMs are the cheapest option because they run on unused Azure capacity at a steep discount (often up to 90% compared to pay-as-you-go). Since the described batch job is fault-tolerant and can be interrupted, it can handle the eviction notice Azure gives before reclaiming capacity. This makes Spot VMs the ideal cost-optimization choice despite the risk of eviction, as the job can simply pause and resume later.

Reserved InstancesWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Reserved Instances require a 1- or 3-year commitment and are not designed for interruptible workloads; they provide cost savings for steady-state, predictable usage, not for short-duration batch jobs that can be interrupted.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A company runs a critical, always-on web application that requires consistent performance and uptime, and they can commit to a 1- or 3-year term to achieve the lowest possible cost for that steady-state workload.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may think Reserved Instances always offer the lowest cost, overlooking that Spot VMs provide even deeper discounts for interruptible, fault-tolerant workloads.

Pay-as-you-goWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Pay-as-you-go does not offer the deep discounts needed for a nightly 10-hour batch job that is fault-tolerant and interruptible; Spot VMs provide up to 90% cost savings for such workloads.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A company needs to run a critical, non-interruptible application 24/7 and requires maximum flexibility with no upfront commitment or long-term contract. Pay-as-you-go would be the correct choice.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may think pay-as-you-go is the cheapest option because it has no upfront cost, but they overlook that Spot VMs offer significantly lower rates for interruptible workloads.

Dedicated HostsWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Dedicated Hosts provide physical servers dedicated to the customer, which is expensive and unnecessary for a fault-tolerant, interruptible batch job that can use cheaper shared infrastructure.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A company requires compliance with specific security or licensing policies that mandate dedicated physical servers (e.g., for a regulated workload that cannot share hardware with other tenants).

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may think Dedicated Hosts offer better reliability or performance for long-running jobs, overlooking the cost and the fact that the job is fault-tolerant and can be interrupted.

Analysis generated from the official AZ-900blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every AZ-900 question from scratch — 981 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This AZ-900 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-900 exam.