Question 291 of 1,031
Describe Azure management and governancemediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is Azure Resource Locks, which override RBAC to prevent accidental deletion. This is correct because Resource Locks apply a 'Deny' effect at the subscription, resource group, or resource level that cannot be bypassed by any RBAC role, including Owner or Contributor—meaning even a user with full administrative permissions cannot delete or modify a locked resource unless the lock itself is first removed by an Owner or User Access Administrator. On the Microsoft Azure Fundamentals AZ-900 exam, this distinction tests your understanding that RBAC controls who can act, while Resource Locks control what actions can be taken regardless of identity, often appearing in scenario-based questions where a Contributor accidentally deletes a critical resource. A common trap is assuming an Owner can always delete anything, but Resource Locks are the exception. Memory tip: think of a padlock on a door—no matter what key (RBAC role) you hold, you cannot open the door until the padlock (Resource Lock) is removed.

AZ-900 Describe Azure management and governance Practice Question

This AZ-900 practice question tests your understanding of describe azure management and governance. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which aspect of Azure governance ensures that resources are protected from accidental or unauthorized deletion regardless of RBAC role?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Azure Resource Locks overriding RBAC

Azure Resource Locks override RBAC because they are applied at the subscription, resource group, or resource level and enforce a 'Deny' effect that cannot be bypassed by any RBAC role, including Owner. This ensures that even users with Contributor or Owner permissions cannot delete or modify a locked resource unless the lock is first removed by an Owner or User Access Administrator.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Azure RBAC deny assignments

    Why it's wrong here

    Deny assignments block specific RBAC actions; Resource Locks are a separate mechanism for protecting resources from modification/deletion.

  • Azure Policy deny effects

    Why it's wrong here

    Policy deny effects prevent non-compliant deployments; Resource Locks protect existing resources from modification/deletion.

  • Azure Resource Locks overriding RBAC

    Why this is correct

    Resource Locks prevent deletion/modification even for users with Owner role — they override RBAC permissions for those operations.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Azure AD Privileged Identity Management restrictions

    Why it's wrong here

    PIM manages privileged access activation; Resource Locks protect resources from modification/deletion.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse Azure Policy's 'deny' effect with Resource Locks, not realizing that Policy only blocks non-compliant resource creation or updates, while Resource Locks block all delete or modify operations regardless of RBAC permissions.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Resource Locks are implemented as a 'Deny' assignment in Azure's authorization system, which is evaluated after RBAC role assignments. This means that even if a user has an RBAC 'Allow' permission to delete a resource, the lock's 'Deny' takes precedence, effectively creating a 'NotDelete' or 'ReadOnly' constraint. In a real-world scenario, a production database could be protected with a 'CanNotDelete' lock so that even a compromised Owner account cannot accidentally drop the resource without first removing the lock, which itself requires Owner or User Access Administrator rights.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-900 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free AZ-900 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-900 question test?

Describe Azure management and governance — This question tests Describe Azure management and governance — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Azure Resource Locks overriding RBAC — Azure Resource Locks override RBAC because they are applied at the subscription, resource group, or resource level and enforce a 'Deny' effect that cannot be bypassed by any RBAC role, including Owner. This ensures that even users with Contributor or Owner permissions cannot delete or modify a locked resource unless the lock is first removed by an Owner or User Access Administrator.

What should I do if I get this AZ-900 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This AZ-900 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-900 exam.