AZ-900 Describe cloud concepts Practice Question

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

• ✗

  To guarantee Microsoft will never have any downtime

  Why it's wrong here

  SLAs do not promise zero downtime; they acknowledge that outages can occur and define the acceptable level of availability. For instance, a 99.9% SLA allows for approximately 8.76 hours of downtime per year, and if the service falls below that threshold, customers are entitled to credits rather than guaranteed continuity.

• ✓

  To define Microsoft's commitments for uptime and the remedies if not met

  Why this is correct

  An Azure SLA defines specific uptime percentages (e.g., 99.9% for most services) and outlines the remedies—typically service credits—that customers receive when Microsoft fails to meet those commitments. This is its core purpose: to establish clear performance expectations and provide a contractual recourse when availability targets are missed.

• ✗

  To prevent customers from migrating to other cloud providers

  Why it's wrong here

  Preventing customer migration is unrelated to SLAs; Azure SLAs are contractual uptime commitments that apply to specific services. They neither create nor remove barriers to leaving the platform; migration and vendor lock-in are governed by data portability features, standard contracts, and operational considerations, not by SLA terms.

• ✗

  To specify how Azure handles customer data

  Why it's wrong here

  The Azure SLA does not govern data handling practices; those are addressed by the Microsoft Privacy Statement and the Data Processing Addendum (DPA). SLAs focus solely on measurable performance metrics like uptime and connectivity, not on how customer data is stored, processed, or protected.

Go deeper

Related to this question