- A
Create a GitHub Actions workflow that validates the PR description contains a closing keyword.
This workflow can run on pull_request and fail if no keyword found.
- B
Configure an issue template with a closing keyword prompt.
Why wrong: Issue templates don't enforce PR descriptions.
- C
Add a branch protection rule requiring a linked issue.
Why wrong: Branch protection rules do not have a built-in option to require issue linking in PR descriptions.
- D
Use a required status check from a third-party app.
Why wrong: It's possible but not the simplest first-party solution.
AZ-400 Configure processes and communications Practice Question
This AZ-400 practice question tests your understanding of configure processes and communications. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
Your organization uses GitHub Flow with branch protections. Developers must link every pull request to an issue using a closing keyword (e.g., 'Fixes #123'). You need to enforce this linking automatically. What should you do?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Create a GitHub Actions workflow that validates the PR description contains a closing keyword.
Option A is correct because a GitHub Actions workflow can be configured to run on pull request events and parse the PR description for a closing keyword pattern (e.g., regex matching 'Fixes #\d+'). If the keyword is missing, the workflow can fail the check, blocking the merge via branch protection rules that require status checks to pass. This directly enforces the linking requirement without relying on human compliance or third-party tools.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Create a GitHub Actions workflow that validates the PR description contains a closing keyword.
Why this is correct
This workflow can run on pull_request and fail if no keyword found.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Configure an issue template with a closing keyword prompt.
Why it's wrong here
Issue templates don't enforce PR descriptions.
- ✗
Add a branch protection rule requiring a linked issue.
Why it's wrong here
Branch protection rules do not have a built-in option to require issue linking in PR descriptions.
- ✗
Use a required status check from a third-party app.
Why it's wrong here
It's possible but not the simplest first-party solution.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates often confuse the 'Require a linked issue' branch protection rule (which only enforces a UI-based link) with the need to validate the PR description text for a closing keyword, leading them to incorrectly select option C.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Under the hood, GitHub Actions workflows use the `pull_request` event trigger and can access the PR body via `github.event.pull_request.body`. A step can run a regex match (e.g., using `grep` or a JavaScript action) to detect patterns like `Fixes #\d+`, `Closes #\d+`, or `Resolves #\d+`. If the match fails, the workflow exits with a non-zero code, causing the status check to fail. This approach is commonly used in open-source projects to automate compliance with contribution guidelines, and it integrates seamlessly with branch protection rules that require status checks to pass before merging.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Configure processes and communications — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Configure processes and communications practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All AZ-400 questions
913 questions across all exam domains
- →
Microsoft Azure DevOps Engineer Expert AZ-400 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
AZ-400 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related AZ-400 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Configure processes and communications practice questions
Practise AZ-400 questions linked to Configure processes and communications.
Design and implement source control practice questions
Practise AZ-400 questions linked to Design and implement source control.
Design and implement build and release pipelines practice questions
Practise AZ-400 questions linked to Design and implement build and release pipelines.
Develop a security and compliance plan practice questions
Practise AZ-400 questions linked to Develop a security and compliance plan.
Implement an instrumentation strategy practice questions
Practise AZ-400 questions linked to Implement an instrumentation strategy.
Design and implement a DevOps infrastructure practice questions
Practise AZ-400 questions linked to Design and implement a DevOps infrastructure.
Design and implement a source control strategy practice questions
Practise AZ-400 questions linked to Design and implement a source control strategy.
AZ-400 fundamentals practice questions
Practise AZ-400 questions linked to AZ-400 fundamentals.
AZ-400 scenario practice questions
Practise AZ-400 questions linked to AZ-400 scenario.
AZ-400 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise AZ-400 questions linked to AZ-400 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free AZ-400 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this AZ-400 question test?
Configure processes and communications — This question tests Configure processes and communications — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Create a GitHub Actions workflow that validates the PR description contains a closing keyword. — Option A is correct because a GitHub Actions workflow can be configured to run on pull request events and parse the PR description for a closing keyword pattern (e.g., regex matching 'Fixes #\d+'). If the keyword is missing, the workflow can fail the check, blocking the merge via branch protection rules that require status checks to pass. This directly enforces the linking requirement without relying on human compliance or third-party tools.
What should I do if I get this AZ-400 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Keep practising
More AZ-400 practice questions
- You have a multi-stage YAML pipeline that deploys to a Linux-based Azure App Service. The pipeline uses a 'Deploy to Azu…
- A development team uses a forking workflow in Azure Repos. They want to ensure that only specific users can create forks…
- A team is migrating from TFVC to Git. They have a large codebase with many branches. What is the recommended approach to…
- A development team is transitioning from a centralized version control system to Git in Azure Repos. The team lead wants…
- A team uses Azure Boards to manage work items. They want to automatically update the state of a work item when a related…
- Which THREE are benefits of using a monorepo vs multiple repositories?
Last reviewed: Jun 25, 2026
This AZ-400 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-400 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.