hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A global e-commerce company uses Azure Cosmos DB to store its product catalog. The catalog is read-heavy, with users worldwide expecting consistent reads with a 99th percentile latency under 10 ms. Writes to the catalog are performed by a central admin team in one region. The company needs to minimize write latency and cost while ensuring that users always see the same data within a single session. Which Cosmos DB configuration should the company choose?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

A global e-commerce company uses Azure Cosmos DB to store its product catalog. The catalog is read-heavy, with users worldwide expecting consistent reads with a 99th percentile latency under 10 ms. Writes to the catalog are performed by a central admin team in one region. The company needs to minimize write latency and cost while ensuring that users always see the same data within a single session. Which Cosmos DB configuration should the company choose?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Single-master write region with Strong consistency and multiple read regions

Strong consistency forces all writes to be replicated synchronously across regions, increasing write latency and potentially reducing availability during outages. It is not justified here.

B

Distractor review

Multi-master write with Eventual consistency and all regions enabled for writes

Multi-master write is unnecessary because writes only come from one region. Eventual consistency may cause users to see stale data within a session, violating the requirement for session consistency.

C

Best answer

Single-master write region with Session consistency and multiple read regions

Session consistency provides a consistent view for a user within a session and allows low-latency reads from multiple regions. Writes are performed in one region, minimizing write latency and cost.

D

Distractor review

Multi-master write with Strong consistency and two regions

This configuration would significantly increase write latency and cost. The strong consistency across multi-master writes is difficult to achieve and unnecessary given the single write location.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-305 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-305 question test?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Single-master write region with Session consistency and multiple read regions — The scenario requires low-latency reads globally with a single write region (central admin) and session consistency to guarantee a consistent view within a user session. Multi-master writes add cost and complexity without benefit since writes occur only from one region. Strong consistency would increase write latency and reduce availability. Using multiple read regions with session consistency meets the performance and consistency needs cost-effectively.

What should I do if I get this AZ-305 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.