Courseiva
Design business continuity solutionshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

AZ-305 Design business continuity solutions Practice Question

A company runs a critical application on Azure VMs in the West US region. They want to protect against a regional disaster by replicating VMs to East US using Azure Site Recovery. They have both managed and unmanaged disks. They need to ensure that after failover, the recovery VMs are automatically placed in a specific availability set to support the application's multi-tier architecture. Additionally, they want to minimize downtime during planned failover. Which configuration should they use?

⚠ Common exam trap

Many exam-takers confuse replication settings (like target availability set per VM) with recovery plans, not realizing that only recovery plans can enforce failover order and group-level placement, which is critical for multi-tier applications.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Configure a recovery plan that includes the VMs and specifies the target availability set and failover order

A recovery plan in Azure Site Recovery allows you to group VMs, specify the target availability set, and define the failover order. This ensures that after failover, the recovery VMs are automatically placed in the specified availability set, supporting the application's multi-tier architecture. Additionally, recovery plans enable you to automate and sequence failover steps, minimizing downtime during planned failover by orchestrating the process efficiently.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Configure a recovery plan that includes the VMs and specifies the target availability set and failover order

    Why this is correct

    A recovery plan in Azure Site Recovery groups all VMs into a single orchestrated failover unit, letting you specify the target availability set in the secondary region and defining the exact failover order. You can add pre/post-action runbooks to automate scripted steps, which minimizes downtime and ensures application-consistent startup during planned failover. Setting availability sets and boot order individually in VM replication settings lacks this coordinated sequencing, so the recovery plan is the appropriate DR orchestration mechanism.

  • Set the target availability set in each VM's replication settings individually without a recovery plan

    Why it's wrong here

    While you can configure target availability set per VM in replication settings, this does not provide the orchestration needed to ensure correct boot order or minimize downtime during planned failover. A recovery plan is more effective.

  • Use Azure Traffic Manager to route traffic to the secondary region after manual failover

    Why it's wrong here

    Azure Traffic Manager operates at the DNS level and only routes incoming traffic to healthy endpoints; it does not perform VM replication, failover, or placement configuration such as target availability sets. While you could point Traffic Manager to the recovered VMs in the secondary region after failover, it has no awareness of failover sequencing, recovery point consistency, or boot order. The replication and failover behavior must be configured separately in Azure Site Recovery, so Traffic Manager alone cannot satisfy the stated requirement.

  • Enable consistency groups across the VMs using a replication policy

    Why it's wrong here

    A replication policy with multi-VM consistency groups in Azure Site Recovery enables crash-consistent or app-consistent recovery points across a set of VMs by coordinating replication, but it does not control the target availability set or failover order in the recovery plan. The consistency group only ensures that all included VMs fail over to the same point in time, reducing data loss; it is a replication-level attribute, not an orchestration-level setting. Failover sequencing and target placement are configured in the recovery plan, not in the replication policy.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

One of 212 original AZ-305 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This AZ-305 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-305 exam.