- A
Increase the Event Hubs trigger's batch size to reduce the number of writes.
Why wrong: Batch size does not affect reliability.
- B
Implement a poison message queue to store failed events and reprocess them later.
Why wrong: Poison queue discards messages after retries; events may be lost.
- C
In the function code, manually write to Cosmos DB and then manually checkpoint the Event Hubs partition.
Why wrong: Manual checkpoint before write risks losing events if function crashes after checkpoint.
- D
Use the Cosmos DB output binding with built-in retry policy and configure the trigger to checkpoint only after successful writes.
Output binding retries on failure; checkpoint after success ensures at-least-once.
Quick Answer
The correct choice is to use the Cosmos DB output binding with its built-in retry policy and configure the Event Hubs trigger to checkpoint only after successful writes. This design ensures at-least-once delivery because the built-in retry policy automatically handles transient failures when writing to Cosmos DB, while deferring the checkpoint prevents the Event Hubs partition offset from advancing until the data is durably stored. On the AZ-204 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of how Azure Functions integrates with Event Hubs and Cosmos DB to achieve resilience—specifically, the trap is to manually implement retry logic or checkpoint prematurely, which risks event loss. The key concept is that the output binding’s retry policy is a declarative, built-in mechanism that handles transient failures without custom code, and checkpointing only after success guarantees no events are missed. Memory tip: “Checkpoint after commit, retry with the binding” to remember that the binding handles retries, and checkpointing must follow a successful write.
AZ-204 Develop Azure compute solutions Practice Question
This AZ-204 practice question tests your understanding of develop azure compute solutions. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
You are designing a serverless application using Azure Functions that processes high-volume events from Azure Event Hubs. The events are then written to Azure Cosmos DB. The function must guarantee at-least-once delivery and be resilient to failures. The Cosmos DB account uses the SQL API and is configured with a single write region. You need to design the function to handle transient failures when writing to Cosmos DB without losing events. What should you do?
Clue words in this question
Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.
Clue:
"least"Why it matters: You want the option with minimum overhead, fewest steps, or lowest impact — not the most feature-rich or comprehensive answer.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Use the Cosmos DB output binding with built-in retry policy and configure the trigger to checkpoint only after successful writes.
Option D is correct because using the Cosmos DB output binding with its built-in retry policy automatically handles transient failures by retrying writes. By configuring the Event Hubs trigger to checkpoint only after a successful write, you ensure that events are not acknowledged until they are durably stored in Cosmos DB, guaranteeing at-least-once delivery and resilience to failures.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Increase the Event Hubs trigger's batch size to reduce the number of writes.
Why it's wrong here
Batch size does not affect reliability.
- ✗
Implement a poison message queue to store failed events and reprocess them later.
Why it's wrong here
Poison queue discards messages after retries; events may be lost.
- ✗
In the function code, manually write to Cosmos DB and then manually checkpoint the Event Hubs partition.
Why it's wrong here
Manual checkpoint before write risks losing events if function crashes after checkpoint.
- ✓
Use the Cosmos DB output binding with built-in retry policy and configure the trigger to checkpoint only after successful writes.
Why this is correct
Output binding retries on failure; checkpoint after success ensures at-least-once.
Clue confirmation
The clue word "least" in the question point toward this answer.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates often think manual checkpointing gives them more control, but it actually introduces a window for data loss if the checkpoint occurs before the write is confirmed, whereas the output binding's built-in retry and automatic checkpointing on success provide a safer, more reliable pattern.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
The Cosmos DB output binding in Azure Functions uses the Azure Cosmos DB SDK's built-in retry logic, which by default retries on transient errors like 429 (rate limiting) and 503 (service unavailable) with exponential backoff. The Event Hubs trigger's checkpointing is tied to the function's success; if the output binding fails after all retries, the function throws an exception, preventing checkpoint advancement and ensuring the event is reprocessed. This pattern is critical for high-throughput scenarios where manual checkpointing could lead to lost events if the function crashes between a successful write and a checkpoint.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Develop Azure compute solutions — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Develop Azure compute solutions practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All AZ-204 questions
997 questions across all exam domains
- →
Microsoft Azure Developer Associate AZ-204 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
AZ-204 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related AZ-204 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Develop Azure compute solutions practice questions
Practise AZ-204 questions linked to Develop Azure compute solutions.
Develop for Azure storage practice questions
Practise AZ-204 questions linked to Develop for Azure storage.
Implement Azure security practice questions
Practise AZ-204 questions linked to Implement Azure security.
Connect to and consume Azure services and third-party services practice questions
Practise AZ-204 questions linked to Connect to and consume Azure services and third-party services.
Monitor, troubleshoot, and optimize Azure solutions practice questions
Practise AZ-204 questions linked to Monitor, troubleshoot, and optimize Azure solutions.
AZ-204 fundamentals practice questions
Practise AZ-204 questions linked to AZ-204 fundamentals.
AZ-204 scenario practice questions
Practise AZ-204 questions linked to AZ-204 scenario.
AZ-204 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise AZ-204 questions linked to AZ-204 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free AZ-204 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this AZ-204 question test?
Develop Azure compute solutions — This question tests Develop Azure compute solutions — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Use the Cosmos DB output binding with built-in retry policy and configure the trigger to checkpoint only after successful writes. — Option D is correct because using the Cosmos DB output binding with its built-in retry policy automatically handles transient failures by retrying writes. By configuring the Event Hubs trigger to checkpoint only after a successful write, you ensure that events are not acknowledged until they are durably stored in Cosmos DB, guaranteeing at-least-once delivery and resilience to failures.
What should I do if I get this AZ-204 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
Are there clue words in this question I should notice?
Yes — watch for: "least". You want the option with minimum overhead, fewest steps, or lowest impact — not the most feature-rich or comprehensive answer.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Keep practising
More AZ-204 practice questions
- An app must store relational state and perform transactions across multiple tables with T-SQL support. Which Azure data…
- You are monitoring an Azure App Service using Application Insights. You notice that the server response time is high for…
- Which TWO services can be used to implement a publish-subscribe messaging pattern in Azure?
- You need to monitor the CPU utilization of an Azure VM in real-time and set up an alert when it exceeds 90%. Which Azure…
- You are monitoring an Azure web application with Application Insights. You notice a sudden increase in the number of fai…
- You are monitoring an Azure web app using Application Insights. You need to create a query that returns the average dura…
Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026
This AZ-204 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-204 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.