Question 738 of 1,170
Manage Azure Identities and GovernancehardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

AZ-104 Manage Azure Identities and Governance Practice Question

This AZ-104 practice question tests your understanding of manage azure identities and governance. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A contractor needs Contributor on only VM1 and VM2 in rg-prod. Other resources in rg-prod must remain untouched, and the contractor must not gain access to any other resource groups or subscriptions. Which two role-assignment scopes meet the requirement? Select two.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Assign the role at the VM1 resource scope.

Option A is correct because assigning the Contributor role at the VM1 resource scope grants the contractor permissions exclusively to that virtual machine, leaving all other resources in rg-prod and other scopes untouched. This meets the requirement of limiting access to only VM1 and VM2 within rg-prod.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Assign the role at the VM1 resource scope.

    Why this is correct

    A resource-level assignment limits permissions to VM1 and does not extend to unrelated resources.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Assign the role at the VM2 resource scope.

    Why this is correct

    A second resource-level assignment can independently grant access to VM2 only.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Assign the role at the rg-prod resource group scope.

    Why it's wrong here

    Resource group scope would grant access to every resource inside rg-prod, which is broader than required.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the requirement were to grant the contractor Contributor access to all resources within rg-prod (e.g., to manage the entire resource group), then assigning the role at the rg-prod resource group scope would be correct.

  • Assign the role at the subscription scope.

    Why it's wrong here

    Subscription scope would expose far more resources than the contractor should manage.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the requirement were to grant the contractor Contributor access to all resources in the subscription (e.g., for full subscription management), then assigning the role at the subscription scope would be correct.

  • Assign the role at the management group scope.

    Why it's wrong here

    Management-group scope is the broadest option here and would inherit into many subscriptions.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The AZ-104 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Assign the role at the VM1 resource scope.Correct answer

Why this is correct

A resource-level assignment limits permissions to VM1 and does not extend to unrelated resources.

Assign the role at the rg-prod resource group scope.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Assigning Contributor at the rg-prod resource group scope would grant the contractor access to all resources in that group, including those that must remain untouched, violating the requirement to limit access to only VM1 and VM2.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the requirement were to grant the contractor Contributor access to all resources within rg-prod (e.g., to manage the entire resource group), then assigning the role at the rg-prod resource group scope would be correct.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may mistakenly think that assigning at the resource group scope is more efficient and still allows granular control, overlooking that it grants permissions to all resources in the group, not just the specified VMs.

Assign the role at the subscription scope.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Assigning Contributor at the subscription scope grants the contractor access to all resources in the subscription, including other resource groups and resources in rg-prod beyond VM1 and VM2, violating the requirement to restrict access to only VM1 and VM2.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the requirement were to grant the contractor Contributor access to all resources in the subscription (e.g., for full subscription management), then assigning the role at the subscription scope would be correct.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may think subscription scope is necessary to cover multiple VMs, or they may confuse the scope levels and believe subscription is the minimum scope needed for resource access.

Analysis generated from the official AZ-104blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often default to assigning roles at the resource group scope for simplicity, forgetting that this grants access to all resources in that group, not just the specified VMs.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Role assignments in Azure RBAC are inherited from higher scopes (management group, subscription, resource group) down to lower scopes (resource). By assigning at the individual resource scope (VM1 and VM2), you create a granular permission boundary that prevents inheritance to other resources. This is implemented via Azure RBAC's role definition and assignment objects stored in Azure Resource Manager, where each assignment has a scope property that defines the boundary of effect.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free AZ-104 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Manage Azure Identities and Governance — This question tests Manage Azure Identities and Governance — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Assign the role at the VM1 resource scope. — Option A is correct because assigning the Contributor role at the VM1 resource scope grants the contractor permissions exclusively to that virtual machine, leaving all other resources in rg-prod and other scopes untouched. This meets the requirement of limiting access to only VM1 and VM2 within rg-prod.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More AZ-104 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This AZ-104 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-104 exam.