Courseiva
Monitor and Maintain Azure ResourcesmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

AZ-104 Monitor and Maintain Azure Resources Practice Question

Exhibit

Azure Monitor > Alerts
Alert rule: cpu-prod-vm
Scope: /subscriptions/1234/resourceGroups/rg-prod/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines/vm01
Condition: Average Percentage CPU > 80 for 5 minutes
Evaluation frequency: 1 minute
Actions: None
Status: Enabled

Based on the exhibit, the alert rule is firing, but the operations team is not receiving any notification. What should you change to make the alert send an email when the condition is met?

⚠ Common exam trap

Candidates often assume increasing evaluation frequency or moving resources will fix notification delivery, but the core requirement is that an action group must be attached to the alert rule to define the notification channel.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Attach an action group that includes the required email recipient.

An alert rule in Azure Monitor requires an action group to define the notification actions (e.g., email, SMS) when the alert fires. Without an action group attached to the alert rule, no notifications are sent, even if the condition is met. Option B correctly identifies that attaching an action group containing the required email recipient will enable email notifications.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Increase the evaluation frequency to 15 minutes so Azure sends a summary notification.

    Why it's wrong here

    A longer evaluation frequency would reduce how often the rule checks the metric. It would not create a notification target, so the team would still not receive email when the alert fires.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the question were 'The alert fires too slowly; what should you change to get faster notifications?', increasing evaluation frequency would be correct to reduce the time between condition checks.

  • Attach an action group that includes the required email recipient.

    Why this is correct

    Azure Monitor alerts need an action group to deliver notifications or trigger automation. In this case the rule is already evaluating correctly, but no action is configured, so the alert has nowhere to send the notification. Attaching an action group with the operations email address fixes the issue without changing the threshold or scope.

  • Create a diagnostic setting on the virtual machine and send logs to a storage account.

    Why it's wrong here

    Diagnostic settings are for exporting resource logs and metrics to destinations such as Log Analytics, storage, or Event Hubs. They do not by themselves create alert notifications for a metric threshold.

    When this WOULD be correct

    This option would be correct if the question asked: 'You need to collect and store VM performance logs for compliance auditing. What should you do?' In that scenario, a diagnostic setting sending logs to a storage account is appropriate.

  • Move the virtual machine into a different resource group so the alert can notify the team.

    Why it's wrong here

    Resource group placement does not control whether an alert sends email. Alerts are driven by the rule, its condition, and the attached action group, not by which resource group contains the VM.

    When this WOULD be correct

    This option would be correct if the question were about resolving a resource conflict (e.g., a policy or role assignment preventing alert creation) or if the alert rule needed to be scoped to a specific resource group for organizational management.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The AZ-104 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Attach an action group that includes the required email recipient.Correct answer

Why this is correct

Azure Monitor alerts need an action group to deliver notifications or trigger automation. In this case the rule is already evaluating correctly, but no action is configured, so the alert has nowhere to send the notification. Attaching an action group with the operations email address fixes the issue without changing the threshold or scope.

Increase the evaluation frequency to 15 minutes so Azure sends a summary notification.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Increasing evaluation frequency does not add email notification capability; the alert rule lacks an action group, which is required to send emails.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the question were 'The alert fires too slowly; what should you change to get faster notifications?', increasing evaluation frequency would be correct to reduce the time between condition checks.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse evaluation frequency with notification delivery, thinking more frequent evaluations will trigger email sending, but email requires an action group.

Create a diagnostic setting on the virtual machine and send logs to a storage account.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Creating a diagnostic setting on the virtual machine and sending logs to a storage account does not configure notifications; it only archives or streams logs. The alert rule already fires, but notifications require an action group with email recipients.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

This option would be correct if the question asked: 'You need to collect and store VM performance logs for compliance auditing. What should you do?' In that scenario, a diagnostic setting sending logs to a storage account is appropriate.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse diagnostic settings with alert notifications, thinking that sending logs to storage will somehow trigger an email, or they may believe that logging is a prerequisite for alerting.

Move the virtual machine into a different resource group so the alert can notify the team.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Moving the virtual machine to a different resource group does not affect alert notifications; action groups are independent of resource group membership and must be explicitly attached to the alert rule.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

This option would be correct if the question were about resolving a resource conflict (e.g., a policy or role assignment preventing alert creation) or if the alert rule needed to be scoped to a specific resource group for organizational management.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may mistakenly believe that resource group membership controls alert delivery, or that moving resources can fix notification issues without understanding the role of action groups.

Analysis generated from the official AZ-104blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

One of 1,049 original AZ-104 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This AZ-104 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-104 exam.