Question 625 of 1,170
Manage Azure Identities and GovernancemediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

AZ-104 Manage Azure Identities and Governance Practice Question

This AZ-104 practice question tests your understanding of manage azure identities and governance. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A compliance team wants to identify all resources in a department that are missing an Environment tag, but they do not want to stop users from creating or changing resources. Which two choices should the administrator make? Select two.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Use an Azure Policy assignment with the Audit effect.

Option A is correct because the Audit effect in Azure Policy allows the compliance team to identify resources missing an Environment tag without blocking resource creation or modification. This effect logs non-compliant resources to the activity log, enabling visibility without enforcement. Option B is correct because assigning the policy at the management group scope ensures it applies to all subscriptions within that department, covering all resources under a single governance boundary.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Use an Azure Policy assignment with the Audit effect.

    Why this is correct

    Audit records noncompliance without blocking activity. That makes it ideal for compliance reporting when the organization wants visibility first and enforcement later.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Assign the policy at the management group scope that contains the department subscriptions.

    Why this is correct

    A management group assignment covers all subscriptions in the department with one configuration. That gives the compliance team broad reporting reach while avoiding repeated per-subscription setup.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Use the Deny effect.

    Why it's wrong here

    Deny would block the deployment or update if the tag is missing. That conflicts with the requirement to let users continue creating and changing resources.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the compliance team needed to enforce the presence of the Environment tag and block any resources that lack it, then using an Azure Policy with the Deny effect would be correct.

  • Grant Reader on the subscription to the compliance team.

    Why it's wrong here

    Reader helps people view resources, but it does not evaluate compliance or generate policy results. Policy is the control that identifies missing tags, not RBAC.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a scenario where the compliance team needs to review resource configurations without making changes, and the goal is simply to grant them visibility into existing resources, granting Reader role at the subscription level would be correct.

  • Apply a ReadOnly lock to all resource groups.

    Why it's wrong here

    ReadOnly locks interfere with normal management operations and still do not provide compliance reporting for missing tags. This is the wrong tool for the task.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the question required preventing accidental deletion or modification of critical resources while still allowing read access, applying a ReadOnly lock to resource groups would be correct. For example, 'You need to ensure that no one can delete or modify resources in a production resource group, but the operations team must still be able to view them.'

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The AZ-104 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Use an Azure Policy assignment with the Audit effect.Correct answer

Why this is correct

Audit records noncompliance without blocking activity. That makes it ideal for compliance reporting when the organization wants visibility first and enforcement later.

Use the Deny effect.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

The Deny effect prevents resource creation or modification if the tag is missing, which contradicts the requirement to not stop users from creating or changing resources.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the compliance team needed to enforce the presence of the Environment tag and block any resources that lack it, then using an Azure Policy with the Deny effect would be correct.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may think that enforcing compliance requires blocking non-compliant actions, but the question explicitly states they do not want to stop users, so Deny is too restrictive.

Grant Reader on the subscription to the compliance team.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Granting Reader permission to the compliance team allows them to view resources but does not identify missing tags or enforce compliance; it only provides read access, not the ability to audit or report on tag requirements.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a scenario where the compliance team needs to review resource configurations without making changes, and the goal is simply to grant them visibility into existing resources, granting Reader role at the subscription level would be correct.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may think that giving the compliance team read access is sufficient for them to manually check for missing tags, overlooking that Azure Policy provides automated compliance assessment and reporting.

Apply a ReadOnly lock to all resource groups.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

A ReadOnly lock prevents any changes to resources, but the compliance team only needs to identify missing tags, not block modifications. The question explicitly states they do not want to stop users from creating or changing resources.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the question required preventing accidental deletion or modification of critical resources while still allowing read access, applying a ReadOnly lock to resource groups would be correct. For example, 'You need to ensure that no one can delete or modify resources in a production resource group, but the operations team must still be able to view them.'

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse 'identifying resources' with 'preventing changes' and think a lock is a safe, non-intrusive way to enforce compliance without understanding that locks block all write operations.

Analysis generated from the official AZ-104blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often confuse the Audit effect with the Deny effect, thinking they need to block non-compliant resources to identify them, or they mistakenly believe granting Reader access is sufficient for automated tag discovery, when in fact Azure Policy is the correct tool for compliance evaluation without enforcement.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Azure Policy uses a policy engine that evaluates resources against defined rules during resource creation, update, and existing resource compliance scans. The Audit effect writes a compliance event to the activity log but does not block the request, making it ideal for discovery without disruption. Assigning at the management group scope leverages the hierarchical inheritance model, where policies propagate to all child subscriptions and resource groups, ensuring consistent coverage across the department.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free AZ-104 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Manage Azure Identities and Governance — This question tests Manage Azure Identities and Governance — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Use an Azure Policy assignment with the Audit effect. — Option A is correct because the Audit effect in Azure Policy allows the compliance team to identify resources missing an Environment tag without blocking resource creation or modification. This effect logs non-compliant resources to the activity log, enabling visibility without enforcement. Option B is correct because assigning the policy at the management group scope ensures it applies to all subscriptions within that department, covering all resources under a single governance boundary.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More AZ-104 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This AZ-104 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-104 exam.