Courseiva
Implement and Manage StorageeasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

AZ-104 Implement and Manage Storage Practice Question

A reporting application stores files in Azure Blob Storage. The business wants the secondary region to be readable if the primary region becomes unavailable. Which redundancy option should you use?

⚠ Common exam trap

A common mix-up: candidates confuse ZRS (zone-redundant within a region) with geo-redundant options, or mistakenly think LRS provides any cross-region resilience, when only RA-GRS offers both geo-replication and read access to the secondary region.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

RA-GRS, because it provides geo-replication with read access to the secondary endpoint.

(RA-GRS) is correct because it provides geo-replication by asynchronously copying data to a secondary region and enables read access to that secondary endpoint. If the primary region becomes unavailable, the application can continue reading from the secondary region, meeting the business requirement for readable secondary access during a primary outage.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • LRS, because it stores all copies in one region only.

    Why it's wrong here

    Locally Redundant Storage (LRS) synchronously writes three copies of your blob data within a single storage scale unit in the primary region, protecting you only against drive and rack failures. LRS does not replicate data to a separate region or to a paired geography, nor does it offer any secondary read endpoint. Because the reporting application explicitly requires the ability to read from a secondary region, LRS fails that core requirement.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A question that asks for the lowest-cost redundancy option for non-critical data that can be regenerated, with no need for cross-region or cross-zone durability, and where data loss from a single disk failure is acceptable.

  • ZRS, because it replicates across availability zones.

    Why it's wrong here

    Zone-Redundant Storage (ZRS) synchronously replicates your data across three Azure availability zones within the same region, which protects against an entire zone becoming unavailable. However, ZRS does not copy data to a different geographical region and does not create a readable secondary endpoint; all three copies remain in the primary region. Thus, while ZRS offers excellent resiliency within a region, it cannot satisfy the requirement for reading from a secondary region.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A question requiring high availability within a single region, such as 'An application needs to survive an entire Azure datacenter failure but remain in the same region. Which redundancy option should you use?'

  • RA-GRS, because it provides geo-replication with read access to the secondary endpoint.

    Why this is correct

    RA-GRS (Read-Access Geo-Redundant Storage) replicates your blob data asynchronously to a paired secondary region and, unlike standard GRS, automatically exposes a public read-access endpoint on that secondary copy. This fulfills the requirement of being able to read the reporting data from a secondary region, even while the primary region is operational. The asynchronous replication means the secondary copy is eventually consistent, but that trade-off is acceptable for a reporting application that can tolerate slight read lag.

  • Archive, because archived blobs are stored cheaply for long-term retention.

    Why it's wrong here

    Archive is an access tier, not a data redundancy option, so choosing Archive would not create any geo-replication or a secondary-region endpoint. Archived blobs are stored in an offline state and must undergo rehydration (which can take up to 15 hours) before they can be read, making them unsuitable for an application that needs to serve active reads from a secondary region. Moreover, Archive can be combined with any redundancy option, but it does not itself provide regional or zone-level replication.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A question asking for the most cost-effective storage tier for long-term retention of rarely accessed data that must be retained for compliance, with no requirement for immediate retrieval.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The AZ-104 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

RA-GRS, because it provides geo-replication with read access to the secondary endpoint.Correct answer

Why this is correct

RA-GRS (Read-Access Geo-Redundant Storage) replicates your blob data asynchronously to a paired secondary region and, unlike standard GRS, automatically exposes a public read-access endpoint on that secondary copy. This fulfills the requirement of being able to read the reporting data from a secondary region, even while the primary region is operational. The asynchronous replication means the secondary copy is eventually consistent, but that trade-off is acceptable for a reporting application that can tolerate slight read lag.

LRS, because it stores all copies in one region only.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

LRS only replicates data within a single data center in the primary region, providing no redundancy for a regional outage. The business requirement is for readable secondary region access, which LRS cannot fulfill.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A question that asks for the lowest-cost redundancy option for non-critical data that can be regenerated, with no need for cross-region or cross-zone durability, and where data loss from a single disk failure is acceptable.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse LRS with a basic redundancy option and overlook the requirement for secondary region read access, or they may not fully understand the differences between replication options.

ZRS, because it replicates across availability zones.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

ZRS replicates data synchronously across availability zones within a single region, providing no geo-redundancy or read access to a secondary region if the primary becomes unavailable.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A question requiring high availability within a single region, such as 'An application needs to survive an entire Azure datacenter failure but remain in the same region. Which redundancy option should you use?'

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse availability zones with regions, thinking ZRS provides cross-region failover, or they may overlook the requirement for a readable secondary region.

Archive, because archived blobs are stored cheaply for long-term retention.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Archive is a blob access tier, not a redundancy option. It does not provide replication or read access to a secondary region.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A question asking for the most cost-effective storage tier for long-term retention of rarely accessed data that must be retained for compliance, with no requirement for immediate retrieval.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse 'Archive' with a redundancy option because it involves storing data in a secondary location, but it is actually a pricing tier for infrequent access.

Analysis generated from the official AZ-104blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Quick reference

Azure Blob Storage Tier Comparison

TierStorage CostRetrieval CostLatencyUse Case
HotHighestLowestImmediateActive data, frequent reads
CoolLowerHigherImmediateData accessed < once / month
ColdLower stillHigherImmediateData accessed < once / quarter
ArchiveLowestHighest + rehydration delayHoursLong-term compliance retention

About these practice questions

One of 1,049 original AZ-104 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This AZ-104 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-104 exam.