Question 560 of 1,170
Deploy and Manage Azure ComputehardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

AZ-104 Deploy and Manage Azure Compute Practice Question

This AZ-104 practice question tests your understanding of deploy and manage azure compute. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A business-critical application runs in a region that does not support availability zones. It uses two Azure VMs and must survive planned maintenance and a single host failure, but it does not need automatic scale-out. Which two actions should the administrator take? Select two.

Question 1hardmulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Place both VMs in the same availability set

Option A is correct because an availability set provides redundancy within a single region that does not support availability zones, protecting against both planned maintenance (via update domains) and host failures (via fault domains). By placing both VMs in the same availability set, Azure ensures they are distributed across multiple fault domains (up to 3) and update domains (up to 20), so a single hardware failure or planned maintenance event does not affect both VMs simultaneously.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Place both VMs in the same availability set

    Why this is correct

    This is the standard design for spreading VMs across fault and update domains.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Deploy the VMs so Azure distributes them across fault and update domains within that set

    Why this is correct

    This ensures the VMs are separated for host and maintenance resiliency as intended.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Deploy the VMs in separate availability zones

    Why it's wrong here

    Zones may not exist in the region, and the scenario explicitly rules out zone-based design.

  • Convert the workload to a single larger VM

    Why it's wrong here

    A single VM removes redundancy and does not protect against host failures or maintenance.

  • Put the VMs in a proximity placement group

    Why it's wrong here

    This improves co-location and performance, but it does not provide the required resilience.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often confuse availability zones with availability sets, assuming zones are always an option, but the question explicitly restricts the region to non-zone support, making the availability set the only viable redundancy mechanism.

Trap categories for this question

  • Scenario analysis trap

    Zones may not exist in the region, and the scenario explicitly rules out zone-based design.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

An availability set uses fault domains (logical groups of hardware sharing a common power source and network switch) and update domains (logical groups that undergo maintenance sequentially). Azure guarantees that VMs in the same availability set are placed in different fault domains (up to 3) and update domains (up to 20), ensuring that at most one VM is affected during a host failure or planned maintenance. This is achieved through the Azure Resource Manager placing VMs based on the set's configuration at deployment time.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

An e-commerce site experiences heavy traffic on Black Friday and near-zero traffic during off-peak weeks. Rather than provisioning permanent large VMs, the team uses auto-scaling groups that add capacity automatically under load and reduce it overnight. Questions like this test whether you understand elasticity, availability zones, and cloud compute scaling patterns.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free AZ-104 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Deploy and Manage Azure Compute — This question tests Deploy and Manage Azure Compute — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Place both VMs in the same availability set — Option A is correct because an availability set provides redundancy within a single region that does not support availability zones, protecting against both planned maintenance (via update domains) and host failures (via fault domains). By placing both VMs in the same availability set, Azure ensures they are distributed across multiple fault domains (up to 3) and update domains (up to 20), so a single hardware failure or planned maintenance event does not affect both VMs simultaneously.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More AZ-104 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This AZ-104 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-104 exam.