Courseiva

AI-900 Practice Question: Describe features of generative AI workloads on Azure

A company uses a generative AI model to answer customer questions about their products. They observe that the model sometimes produces factually incorrect or fabricated information. To reduce these inaccuracies, they want to provide the model with relevant, up-to-date product documentation as context before generating a response. Which technique is being applied?

⚠ Common exam trap

Microsoft often tests the distinction between grounding (providing external context at inference time) and fine-tuning (updating model weights), so candidates mistakenly choose fine-tuning when the scenario describes adding new information without retraining.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Grounding

B is correct because grounding is the technique of providing a generative AI model with specific, authoritative source data (such as product documentation) as context before generating a response. This anchors the model's output to verified facts, directly reducing hallucinations and fabricated information by constraining the generation to the provided context.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Prompt Engineering

    Why it's wrong here

    Prompt engineering crafts the input query or context window to steer the model's output, but it only leverages knowledge already baked into the model's static parameters. To inject fresh or proprietary product documentation, a prompt would need to manually paste the text each time, which is unsystematic, token-limited, and not a true architectural fix. It can reduce stylistic errors but does not automatically connect to an external data source, so it is far less robust than grounding for factual accuracy.

  • Grounding

    Why this is correct

    Grounding anchors the generative model's decoding process to a curated external knowledge source, such as product documentation or a vectorized enterprise search index. During inference, the system retrieves relevant passages and inserts them into the prompt context, forcing the model to base its answer on those verifiable facts rather than on unconstrained parametric memory. This significantly lowers hallucination risk and improves accuracy and traceability, which is exactly why it is the correct method for a customer-answer system needing up-to-date, domain-specific information.

  • Fine-tuning

    Why it's wrong here

    Fine-tuning updates the model's weights via supervised learning on a labeled dataset of domain-specific question-answer pairs, thereby internalizing patterns from that dataset. However, it requires a large, high-quality corpus, substantial compute, and a full retraining cycle whenever facts change, making it poor for rapidly evolving product knowledge. It can also introduce catastrophic forgetting or overfitting, and it does not provide a direct citation or retrieval link, so it is less suitable than grounding for real-time factual accuracy.

  • Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)

    Why it's wrong here

    Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) trains a reward model from human comparisons of model outputs to optimize for subjective qualities like helpfulness, safety, and alignment with user preferences. It adjusts the policy's behavior but does not load any new factual content into the model, so it cannot fix hallucinations about current product details. RLHF is complementary to grounding—it shapes tone and style while grounding supplies the evidence—but on its own it lacks the external knowledge injection this scenario demands.

About these practice questions

One of 985 original AI-900 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This AI-900 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AI-900 exam.