- A
NFS version mismatch
Why wrong: Write failures on specific files suggest permission issue.
- B
root_squash maps root to nobody
Root on client is mapped to nobody, lacking ownership permissions.
- C
Client mount option 'noexec'
Why wrong: Noexec affects execution, not writes.
- D
Missing 'rw' option in /etc/exports
Why wrong: Exports includes rw.
LPIC-2 Network Client Management Practice Question
This LPIC-2 practice question tests your understanding of network client management. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A Linux server exports a directory /data via NFS to a client. The client mounts it with 'mount -t nfs server:/data /mnt/data'. Write operations from the client fail with 'Permission denied' on some files. The server's /etc/exports contains: /data 192.168.1.0/24(rw,root_squash). What is the most likely issue?
Clue words in this question
Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.
Clue:
"most likely"Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
root_squash maps root to nobody
The 'root_squash' option in /etc/exports maps the UID 0 (root) on the client to the 'nobody' user (typically UID 65534) on the server. When a client user with UID 0 attempts to write to files owned by other users or with restrictive permissions, the server sees the request as coming from 'nobody', which lacks write access, resulting in 'Permission denied'. This is the most likely cause because the client mount command does not specify 'no_root_squash', and the server's export explicitly enables root squashing.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
NFS version mismatch
Why it's wrong here
Write failures on specific files suggest permission issue.
- ✓
root_squash maps root to nobody
Why this is correct
Root on client is mapped to nobody, lacking ownership permissions.
Clue confirmation
The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Client mount option 'noexec'
Why it's wrong here
Noexec affects execution, not writes.
- ✗
Missing 'rw' option in /etc/exports
Why it's wrong here
Exports includes rw.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates often confuse 'root_squash' with a missing 'rw' option or assume a version mismatch, when in fact the permission error on writes by root is the classic symptom of root squashing being active.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Under the hood, NFSv3 and NFSv4 use the server's UID/GID mapping for access control; 'root_squash' is implemented by the NFS server (rpc.mountd or nfsd) rewriting the credential of any request with UID 0 to the anonymous UID (typically 65534). A real-world scenario is when an administrator mounts an NFS export as root but forgets that 'root_squash' is enabled, causing all root-owned file operations to fail silently unless the export includes 'no_root_squash' or the client uses a non-root user with appropriate permissions.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A practitioner preparing for the LPIC-2 exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Network Client Management — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Network Client Management practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All LPIC-2 questions
511 questions across all exam domains
- →
Linux Professional Institute Certification Level 2 LPIC-2 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
LPIC-2 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related LPIC-2 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Linux Kernel and System Startup practice questions
Practise LPIC-2 questions linked to Linux Kernel and System Startup.
Block Devices, Filesystems and Advanced Storage practice questions
Practise LPIC-2 questions linked to Block Devices, Filesystems and Advanced Storage.
Advanced Networking Configuration practice questions
Practise LPIC-2 questions linked to Advanced Networking Configuration.
DNS, Web and Mail Services practice questions
Practise LPIC-2 questions linked to DNS, Web and Mail Services.
File Sharing and Samba practice questions
Practise LPIC-2 questions linked to File Sharing and Samba.
System Security practice questions
Practise LPIC-2 questions linked to System Security.
Network Client Management practice questions
Practise LPIC-2 questions linked to Network Client Management.
LPIC-2 fundamentals practice questions
Practise LPIC-2 questions linked to LPIC-2 fundamentals.
LPIC-2 scenario practice questions
Practise LPIC-2 questions linked to LPIC-2 scenario.
LPIC-2 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise LPIC-2 questions linked to LPIC-2 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free LPIC-2 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this LPIC-2 question test?
Network Client Management — This question tests Network Client Management — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: root_squash maps root to nobody — The 'root_squash' option in /etc/exports maps the UID 0 (root) on the client to the 'nobody' user (typically UID 65534) on the server. When a client user with UID 0 attempts to write to files owned by other users or with restrictive permissions, the server sees the request as coming from 'nobody', which lacks write access, resulting in 'Permission denied'. This is the most likely cause because the client mount command does not specify 'no_root_squash', and the server's export explicitly enables root squashing.
What should I do if I get this LPIC-2 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
Are there clue words in this question I should notice?
Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Keep practising
More LPIC-2 practice questions
- Which TWO of the following are valid methods to modify kernel parameters at runtime without rebooting?
- A systems administrator is troubleshooting a server that fails to boot after a kernel upgrade. The boot process hangs at…
- An administrator is designing a high-availability storage solution using DRBD. The requirement is to have two nodes with…
- Refer to the exhibit. The system boots successfully, but the root filesystem is mounted as read-only even after the boot…
- Which TWO statements about LVM thin provisioning are correct?
- A client on the internet sends a TCP SYN packet to 10.0.1.10:8080. The router receives it on eth0. According to the exhi…
Last reviewed: Jun 25, 2026
This LPIC-2 practice question is part of Courseiva's free LPI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the LPIC-2 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.