Question 435 of 514
Routing FundamentalsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

JNCIA-JUNOS Routing Fundamentals Practice Question

This JNCIA-JUNOS practice question tests your understanding of routing fundamentals. Examine the command output carefully: the correct answer depends on what the output actually shows, not on general recall alone. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A static route with a next-hop of 10.0.0.1 is configured, but the route is not appearing in the active routing table. The output of `show route 10.0.0.1` shows that 10.0.0.1 is reachable via an OSPF route with preference 10. What is the most likely reason the static route is not active?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Review the full OSPF breakdown →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The static route is configured with a qualified-next-hop that fails.

Option A is correct because the static route may be configured with a qualified-next-hop that is not satisfied. Option B is wrong because static route preference (5) is lower than OSPF (10), so static should be active. Option C is wrong because next-hop reachable via OSPF should allow static route to be active. Option D is wrong because metric is not compared across protocols.

Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The OSPF route has a lower metric than the static route.

    Why it's wrong here

    Metric is only compared within the same protocol, not between static and OSPF.

  • The static route's next-hop is not directly connected.

    Why it's wrong here

    Next-hop reachability is sufficient via any protocol; direct connection is not required.

  • The static route is configured with a qualified-next-hop that fails.

    Why this is correct

    A qualified-next-hop condition can prevent the static route from becoming active.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

  • The static route has a higher preference than OSPF.

    Why it's wrong here

    Static default preference is 5, which is lower than OSPF's 10, so static should be preferred.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct

OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
  • Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
  • OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
  • A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
  • Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
  • Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.

Key takeaway

OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related JNCIA-JUNOS OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Related practice questions

Related JNCIA-JUNOS practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free JNCIA-JUNOS practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this JNCIA-JUNOS question test?

Routing Fundamentals — This question tests Routing Fundamentals — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The static route is configured with a qualified-next-hop that fails. — Option A is correct because the static route may be configured with a qualified-next-hop that is not satisfied. Option B is wrong because static route preference (5) is lower than OSPF (10), so static should be active. Option C is wrong because next-hop reachable via OSPF should allow static route to be active. Option D is wrong because metric is not compared across protocols.

What should I do if I get this JNCIA-JUNOS question wrong?

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related JNCIA-JUNOS OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This JNCIA-JUNOS practice question is part of Courseiva's free Juniper Networks certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the JNCIA-JUNOS exam.