Question 382 of 529
Software Development SecurityhardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is parameterized queries, stored procedures with explicit parameter definitions, and input validation. These three countermeasures prevent SQL injection by ensuring that user-supplied data is never interpreted as executable code by the database engine. Parameterized queries, also known as prepared statements, enforce strict separation between SQL logic and data, while stored procedures with explicit parameter definitions similarly bind inputs as data-only values. Input validation further reduces risk by rejecting or sanitizing harmful characters before they reach the query. On the CISSP exam, this question tests your understanding of application security controls within the Software Development Security domain; a common trap is confusing output encoding or hashing with injection prevention. Output encoding applies to cross-site scripting, not database-layer attacks, and hashing would break query logic by altering the data. Remember the mnemonic P.S.I. — Parameters, Stored procedures, Input validation — to recall the three direct countermeasures against SQL injection.

CISSP Software Development Security Practice Question

This CISSP practice question tests your understanding of software development security. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which THREE of the following are valid countermeasures to prevent SQL injection vulnerabilities? (Select exactly 3.)

Question 1hardmulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Using parameterized queries or prepared statements

Options A, B, and D are correct. Parameterized queries separate code from data, stored procedures can be written securely, and input validation limits harmful characters. Option C is wrong because output encoding does not prevent injection at the database layer. Option E is wrong because hashing would break the query logic.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Using parameterized queries or prepared statements

    Why this is correct

    Parameterized queries prevent malicious input from altering SQL structure.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Implementing strict input validation on user-supplied data

    Why this is correct

    Input validation can block dangerous characters, but should not be sole defense.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Encoding output to the user

    Why it's wrong here

    Output encoding prevents XSS, not SQL injection.

  • Hashing the input before insertion into the database

    Why it's wrong here

    Hashing destroys the original data, making SQL meaningless.

  • Using stored procedures with explicit parameter definitions

    Why this is correct

    If stored procedures use parameters, they reduce injection risk.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    Output encoding prevents XSS, not SQL injection.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which CISSP exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related CISSP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CISSP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CISSP question test?

Software Development Security — This question tests Software Development Security — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Using parameterized queries or prepared statements — Options A, B, and D are correct. Parameterized queries separate code from data, stored procedures can be written securely, and input validation limits harmful characters. Option C is wrong because output encoding does not prevent injection at the database layer. Option E is wrong because hashing would break the query logic.

What should I do if I get this CISSP question wrong?

Identify which CISSP exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CISSP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISSP exam.